The Effects of Using Geo – Inquiry Process on Future Thinking Abilities of Tenth Grade Students Enrolling in Southeast Asia World Course
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) compare the learning achievement on Southeast Asia World of tenth grade students before and after they studied Geo – Inquiry Process 2) compare the Future Thinking Abilities before and after they studied Geo – Inquiry Process and 3) study opinions of tenth grade students towards Geo – Inquiry Process. The sample used in this research was 40 tenth grade students of first semester in 2021 at Saint Gabriel’s college, Bangkok random by volunteer sampling. The instruments used in the study were 1) lesson plans 2) an achievement test on Southeast Asia World 3) a Future Thinking Abilities test and 4) a questionnaire for opinions of students towards Geo – Inquiry Process. The data were analyzed by using mean (M), standard deviation (S.D.), t-test for dependent and content analysis. The research results revealed that: 1) the learning achievement on Southeast Asia World of tenth grade students after the use of Geo – Inquiry Process was higher than before the use of Geo – Inquiry Process with statistical significance at the level of .05. 2) the Future Thinking Abilities of tenth grade students after the use of Geo – Inquiry Process were higher than before the use of Geo – Inquiry Process with statistical significance at the level of .05 and 3) Opinions of tenth grade students towards Geo – Inquiry Process overall is on the high level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กนก จันทรา. (2561). การรู้เรื่องภูมิศาสตร์: ถอดบทเรียนประสบการณ์การจัดการเรียนรู้ภูมิศาสตร์ในชั้นเรียนที่เสริมสร้างการรู้เรื่องภูมิศาสตร์. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
นาตยา ปิลันทนานนท์. (2526). อนาคตศาสตร์. กรุงเทพฯ: โอเดียนสโตร์.
สำนักวิชาการ และมาตรฐานการศึกษา. (2561). คู่มือการใช้มาตรฐานการเรียนรู้และตัวชี้วัดสาระภูมิศาสตร์ (ฉบับปรับปรุง 2560) ในกลุ่มสาระการเรียนรู้สังคมศึกษา ศาสนา และวัฒนธรรมตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน 2551. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.
Edelson, C; Daniel. (2011). Learn about geo-literacy—what it is, why it's important, and what we can do to advance geo-literacy in the U.S. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://www.nationalgeographic.org/article/geo-literacy-preparation-far-reaching-decisions/
Environmental Systems Research Institute: ESRI. (2003). Geographic Inquiry: Thinking Geographically. Retrieved August 18, 2020 from: https://www.esri.com/Industries/k-12/education/~/media /Files/Pdfs/industries/k-12/pdfs/geoginquiry.pdf
Guinness and Nagle. (2014). Geography Second Edition. Second published Dubai.
Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2011). Developing Students’ Futures Thinking in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687–708. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9.
National Geographic Society. (2017). Geo – Inquiry Process Educator Guide. Retrieved August 18, 2020 from: https://media.nationalgeographic.org/assets/file/Educator_Guide_Geo_Inquiry_Final_1.pdf
Oxford University Press. (in press). Oxford Big Ideas Geography 8: Geographers Toolkit. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://www.oup.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/58038/Oxford-Big-Ideas-Geography-8-Geographers-Toolkit.pdf
Siew, N. and Rahman, M. (2019). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Future Thinking Test using Rasch Measurement Model. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(4), pp. 139-149.
Tilbury, D (2011). Education for Sustainable Development: An Expert Review of Processes and Learning. Retrived September 29, 2020, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/927unesco10.pdf
United Nations Thailand. (2015). การจัดทำเป้าหมายการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน (Sustainable Development Goals–SDGs). ค้นเมื่อ 21 กันยายน 2563, จาก https://www.un.or.th/globalgoals/th/the-goals/
Warren et al. (2014). Sustainability Education Framework for Teachers: Developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking, Journal of Sustainability Education, 6, 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Warren-et-al.-JSE-May-2014-With-Hyperlinks-Rider-corrected.pdf
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203-218.
