An Investigation of Learning Behaviors and Thematic Data Analysis using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Elementary Students’ Group-Based Cell Pizza Activity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teaching complex biological concepts like cell structure to elementary students is challenging due to the abstract nature of the content and the limitations of traditional didactic methods. Creating hands-on, constructive learning environments is crucial for fostering engagement and scientific literacy. This research aimed to investigate elementary students’ learning behaviors through participation in the Cell Pizza activity, a hands-on collaborative science learning approach, utilizing thematic analysis and Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) for systematic data coding and synthesis. The population consisted of elementary students from grades 4 to 6 at Tha Khlong 1 Municipal School, and the sample of 75 students was selected through purposive sampling based on participation in the science camp program. The research instruments included observation forms, video recordings, student worksheets, and Cell Pizza evaluation rubrics. Quantitative findings showed that the majority (70%) accurately identified cell types and labeled all organelles correctly. Prominent learning behaviors included accurate scientific vocabulary usage, collaborative learning, visual referencing, and creative representation using tangible materials. However, students encountered confusion regarding complex organelle names, particularly smooth and rough endoplasmic reticulum. The integration of Generative AI effectively reduced analysis time and enhanced precision in natural language processing, although limitations remained regarding deep contextual interpretation. Therefore, combining Generative AI with human analysis is recommended to ensure optimal accuracy and interpretative quality.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alparuq, M., et al. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in elementary science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–12.
Bawaneh, A. K. (2023). Learning biology through innovative models: The impact of active model-based learning on students’ comprehension of cell structure. International Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2163081
Carlan, F. de A., Sepel, L. M. N., & Loreto, E. L. S. (2014). Teaching cell biology in primary schools. Education Research International, 2014, Article ID 272475, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/272475
Chamrat, S. (2025). AI companion for graduate studies and researcher: A guide for AI to support graduate studies and researchers. Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University. ISBN (e-book): 978-616-626-370-1 [in Thai]
Chamrat, S., & Suyamun, P. (2023). Application of ChatGPT for content analysis of STEM activity modules based on the DIY, Tinkerer, and Maker conceptual framework. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education, 8(2), 16-34. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmujedu/article/view/272293 [in Thai]
Costa, M. J., de Souza, D. N., & Franco, M. D. (2021). Understanding scientific terminology: A challenge for primary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1887452
Damaševičius, R. (2024). ChatGPT-supported student assessment – can we rely on it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(2), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2024-195
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Fitzgerald, A., & Smith, K. (2016). Science that matters: Exploring science learning and teaching in primary schools. Monash University Publishing.
Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 199–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_13
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
Kooli, C., & Yusuf, N. (2024). Transforming educational assessment: Insights into the use of ChatGPT and large language models in grading. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 3388–3399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2338330
Laius, M. (2015). Science education in primary schools: Curriculum, teaching, and learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 6–18.
Naeem, M., Bilal, M., Zeeshan, M., & Khan, S. (2024). Enhancing assessment and feedback in higher education using ChatGPT: Opportunities and challenges. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12463-7
Ozerk, K. (2020). Student engagement and classroom management in primary science education: A qualitative study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020456648
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Tibahary, A. R. (2018). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Muliana. Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy, 1(3), 54 – 64. https://doi.org/10.56488/scolae.v1i1.12
Tinsley, H. N. (2019). Teaching cell structures through games. CourseSource, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2019.23
Turobov, A., Coyle, D., & Harding, R. (2024). Using ChatGPT for thematic analysis. Bennett Institute for Public Policy, University of Cambridge. https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/blog/using-chatgpt-thematic-analysis/
Vijapurkar, J., Kawalkar, A., & Nambiar, P. (2014). What do cells really look like? An inquiry into students’ difficulties in visualising a 3-D biological cell and lessons for pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9379-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.