A Review of Developmental Pathways for "Scientific Literacy" in Thai Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
The term “Scientific Literacy” is one of the terms that is used to represent the desires of a quality citizen. Originally, this word was often used with a broad meaning. After the exponential developments of science and technology, in-depth knowledge is essential to solving complex problems. These make an inclusion of the term with the goals of science education at the school
level. There are various definitions of the term. Sometimes, the definition depends on the social
context of the person who defines it. PISA defined the term as “The ability to engage with science-related issues, and with the ideas of science, as a reflective citizen". This definition is defined as a 15-year-old student's science framework. At present, the awareness of teachers and learning facilitators has led to research studies on the development and promotion of scientific literacy in Thailand. Topics (of those research) can be divided into 3 issues: developing scientific literacy of Science teachers, development of approaches for learning activities in Science subjects and development of students' scientific literacy However, from PISA’s data, it was found that
Thai students still had science literacy lower than the average of the PISA member countries. Therefore, all stakeholders must find the meaning of science literacy in line with the context of Thai society and develop research for the learning activities that promote scientific literacy and the assessment for science literacy in accordance with the real situation in Thailand context.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, R. (2003). The Programme for International Student Assessment: An Overview. In R.Adams, M. Wu (Eds.), PISA 2000 Technical Report (p. 15). OECD Publishing.
Baumert, J. (1997). Scientific Literacy: A German Perspective. In W. Graeber, C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy. An international symposium (p. 167-180). Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwis-senschaften (IPN).
Branscomb, L. (1981). Only One Science: Twelfth Annual Report of the National Science Board. Superintendent of Documents.
Bucchi, M., & Saracino, B. (2016). “Visual science literacy”: Images and public understanding of science in the digital age. Science Communication, 38(6), 812-819.
Buranasathitwong, P., Sawangmek, S., & Nangngam, P. (2019). Developing of Explain Phenomena Scientifically and Interpret Data and Evidence Scientifically Competencies for Grade 10th Student through Advertising as a Learning Management in Topic of the Digestive System. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 21(2), 212- 224. [In Thai]
Chanapimuk, K., Sawangmek, S., & Nangngam, P. (2018). Promoting Scientific Literacy by using Science, Technology, Society, and Environment (STSE) Approach of Grade 11 Students on Plant Growth. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 22(2), 62-73. [In Thai]
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 275-288.
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13–16.
Jaruanlikitkawin, W., & Chaikit, N. (2020). Scientific Literacy of Science Teacher Students. Journal Education Thaksin University, 20(2), 154-165. [In Thai]
Ladachart, L., & Yuengyong, C. (2017). Using Scientific-Inquiry Ativities for Developing Teachers' and Supervisors' Scientific Literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 482–492. [In Thai]
Maienschein, J., Burger, I., Enshaie, R., Glitz, M., Kevern, K., Maddin, B., Rivera, M., Rutowski, D., Shindell, M., Unger, A., Burough, D., Kesh, A., Martinez, J., Tapia, P., & Williams, S. (1998). Scientific literacy. Science, 281(5379).
Maotuek, S., Srisuk, K., Intanate, N., & Hanwong, U. (2015). The Use of Reflective Thinking to Develop the Science Teachers’ Competency in the Instruction to Promote Students’ Scientific Literacy. Journal of Liberal Arts Maejo University, 3(1), 13-36. [In Thai]
Nammungkun, W., Ruangsuwan, C., & Yang, F. Y. (2020). High School Students’ Scientific Epistemic Beliefs. CMU Journal of Education, 4(1), 37-49. [In Thai]
Ngudgratoke, S., & Koedsri, A. (2016). G-DINA Diagnostic Assessment of Scientific Literacy of Lower Secondary School Student Using G-DINA Model. Jounal of Education Khon Kaen University, 41(4), 37-53. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2015). The Status of Teacher Production and Development in Thailand. Prigwhan Graphic Co., LTD. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council.. (2018). Education in Thailand 2018. Prigwhan Graphic Co., LTD. [In Thai]
Office of the National Education Commission. (2002). National Education Plan (2002 - 2016): Summary Edition. Prigwhan Graphic Co., LTD. [In Thai]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2007). PISA 2006 Science competencies for Tomorrow’s World – Volume 1: Analysis. OECD publications.
Roikrong, W., & Bongkotphet, T. (2019). STEM Problem-Based Learning on Exploration and Production of Petroleum topic to enhance of Scientific Literacy of the 9th Grade Students. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal, 14(3), 135-148. [In Thai]
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a wellfunctioning society. Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life?. Science Education, 104(5), 873-894.
Soottiwayaylarkul, W., Bongkotphet, T., & Nakkuntod, M. (2020). Action Research on Developing Scientific Literacy in Animal Anatomy and Physiology Topic Using Argument-Driven Inquiry Method for 11th Grade Students. Humanity and Social Science Journal, Ubon Ratchathani University, 11(2), 254-279. [In Thai]
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). [In Thai]
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2020). About Pisa. https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/about-pisa/
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2021). Assessment Results of PISA 2018, Reading, Mathematics, and of Science. The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). [In Thai]