Instructional Model of POSN E-camp for Gifted Students in Physics During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Main Article Content

Punsiri Dam-O
Phitthaphon Phithak

Abstract

In the past, the Physics Olympic Training Camp 2 was organized traditionally – in class and laboratory, in which the students and trainers can directly face-to-face communicate. Until 2019, there was a global COVID-19 pandemic, the Physics Olympic Training Camp 2 cannot be taken place as usual. To prevent COVID-19 infection, the traditional training has been changed to distance training. To maintain the nature of the Physics Olympic Training Camp 2 which is an intensive course, the organizer, therefore, developed the POSN E-camp model for remote training, to study students’ satisfaction and learning achievement. This model consists of 5 steps that are plan, set teaching and learning activities according to the Olympic curriculum, simulation of the activities, train as nature of physics, and evaluation. The research tools are a test of learning achievement and a questionnaire on the satisfaction of students. From the study, overall results show that 52.9% of all respondents were satisfied with the training camp with the POSN E-camp model at a high level, and obtained a higher average score compared to the previous year.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dam-O, P. ., & Phithak, P. . (2022). Instructional Model of POSN E-camp for Gifted Students in Physics During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 33(2), 107–123. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edupsu/article/view/244046
Section
Research Articles

References

Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R. & Ozden, M. Y. (2009) Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 10(6), 65-83.

Alsaadat, K. (2019). Strategic Human Resource Management Technology Effect and Implication for Distance Training and Learning, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(1), 314-322.

Anderson, T. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Retrieved from

https://www.aupress.ca/app/uploads/120146_99Z_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf

Gorsky, P. & Trumper, R. (2004). Dialogue in a distance education physics course. Open Learning, 19(3), 265-277.

Kammanee, T., (2011). Science of teaching, knowledge for efficient learning management. Bangkok: Chulalonkorn University. [in Thai]

Litkityinwara, S., & Sungsri, S. (2013). Development of distance learning model for Faculty of Education, Rajabhat University. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 309-321. [in Thai]

Mavroudi, A., & Hadzilacos, T. (2013). Learning Needs Analysis of Collaborative E-Classes in Semi-Formal Settings: The REVIT Example. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 211-239.

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of Transactional Distance. In D.Keegan (Ed). Theoretical principles of distance education. London, New York: Routledge, (pp.22-38).

The Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (2001). The handbook of research for educational communications and technology. Retrieved from http://members.aect.org/edtech/ed1/13/13-02.html

Vanakieat, K., (1997). Effectiveness of distance learning via Thai Com satellite: a case study of informal school at Sankampaeng district, Chiangmai province. [Master degree thesis of communication arts]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Visavateeranon, S., & Chindanurak, T. (2018). Education of Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University 40 year with success in distance learning. STOU Education Journal, 11(2), 1-18. [in Thai]