A Development of Sciences Learning Model Mixed Active Learning Approaches Between Flipped Classroom and Creativity-Based Learning for Developing Creative Thinking and Innovation in Science for Matthayomsuksa 2 (Grade 8) Students at the Demonstration School of Ramkhamhaeng University

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to: 1) develop science learning model using creative- based learning approach together with flipped classroom concept for Matthayomsuksa 2 (Grade 8) students at the Demonstration School of Ramkhamhaeng University to achieve efficiency at the criteria of 80/80, and 2) study the results of using science the learning model using creative-based learning approach together with the flipped classroom concept which affected innovative thinking in science of Matthayomsuksa 2 (Grade 8) students at the Demonstration School of Ramkhamhaeng University. The target group in this study consisted of 28 students studying in the first semester of academic year 2022, selected by using purposive sampling method. The research tools included a learning management plan, a manual for implementing model, a form for assessing innovative thinking in science, an interview form, a behavior observation form, and an open-ended questionnaire. The data were analyzed by using percentage, mean, and standard deviation.

The research results revealed that:1) the average formative score of Science learning model mixed active learning approaches between flipped classroom and creativity -based learning was 88.10 Percent and the average summative test score was 93.82 Percent (88.10/93.82) which meets the set criterion (80/80) and 2 the results of using the model in each aspects were as follows: 1. Identification of problems/ interest issues and their relationship with innovative thinking in science was at a high level ( = 3),
2. Innovative thinking process in science was at a high level ( = 2.76), 3. Presentation was at a high level ( = 2.71), 4. Creative thinking was at a high level ( = 2.61), and the overall result of using of creative thinking and innovation in science was at a high level ( = 2.77).