A Study of Desirable Characteristic of Quality Students for Future Global Society
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This qualitative research aimed to study the desirable characteristics of quality students in the future global society using qualitative research method. The research methodology comprised of 2 steps, 1) Study research conceptual framework by reviewing 21 works of literature. The research instrument was synthetic content form. Data were analyzed using content analysis. 2) Evaluate the proposed desirable characteristics of the quality students for the future global society by (1) conducting a focus group with 21 experts and (2) conducting interviews with
6 students. Informants were chosen by a specific selection. The research instruments were opinion form and structured interview form. Data were analyzed using content analysis. The research findings were as follows; The desirable characteristics of the quality students for the future global society consisted of 4 main aspects with 10 sub-elements for each main aspect, namely, Aspect 1 Characteristics of Social and Emotional Leader, Aspect 2 Characteristics of Virtue, Ethical and Values leader, Aspect 3 Characteristics of Change leader, and Aspect 4 Characteristics of Innovative and Entrepreneurial leader. The research results will be able to guide policymakers or school administrators to determine the desirable characteristics of learners in accordance with the dynamic global social context. Schools should develop students' leadership to lead themselves and others in order to change the future world with sustainability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alston, J. M. (2018). 10 Characteristics of Successful Students. Retrieved 12 July 2019, from https://inomics.com/insight/10-characteristics-of-successful-students-602112
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71–82.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA:Australia). (2013). General Capabilities. Retrieved 15 May 2019, from http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/General_Capabilities_2011.pdf
Bass, Bernard M. (1999). Transformational leadership: industrial, military, and educational impact. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bunnag, C. (2019). Effective governance: concepts of management principles for sustainable development. Retrieved 15 February 2021, from https://www.sdgmove.com/2019/09/30/effective-governance. [in Thai]
Chareonwongsak, K. (2003). Future images and desirable characteristics of Thai people (Research Report). N.P.: Office of the National Education Commission. [in Thai]
Chamornman, U. (1988). Research Synthesis: Quantitative. Bangkok: Panni Plublishing. [in Thai]
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2010). Research methods in education (6th ed.). NY: Routledge.
Dechakup, P. (2014). Learning Management in the 21st Century. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Division of Educational Administration and Quality Assurance. (2017). Thailand 4.0: Model to drive Thailand towards prosperity, stability and sustainability. [in Thai]
Ganowicz-Baczyk, A. (2016). Anthropocentric Character of the Principle of Sustainable Development. In Kureethadam J. I., Łepko Z., Sadowsk R. F. (Editors), Returning to the Home. Ways to Recover our Common Home (pp.272-295). Rome: Libreria Ateneo Salesiano.
Goleman, D. & Boyatzis, E. R. (2017). Emotional Intelligence Has 12 Elements. Which Do You Need to Work On?. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/02/emotional-intelligence-has-12-elements-which-do-you-need-to-work-on
Higgs, M. & Rowland, D. (2008). Change and its Leadership Change Leadership that Works: The Role of Positive Psychology. Organisations & people, 15(2).
Horney, N., & O’Shea, T. (2015). Focused, fast and flexible: Creating agility advantage in a VUCA World. CA: BookBaby.
International Baccalaureate (IB). (2013). IB learner profile. International Baccalaureate.
Mackay, C. (2019). 10 Qualities You Find in Good Students and Good Citizens. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/mrsdicarnesseventhgradeclass/characteristics-of-a-good-student
Manders, K. (2014). Leaders Make the Future: Ten New Leadership Skills for an Uncertain World [review] / Bob Johansen. The journal of applied Christian leadership, 8(1), Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=jacl
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology: (MEXT) Japan. (2006). Basic Act on Education. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/lawandplan/title01/detail01/1373798.htm
MOE. (2008). Basic Education Core Program 2008. Ministry of Education. [in Thai]
MOE. (2017). Basic Education Core Program B.E. 2551, revised version 2017. Ministry of Education. [in Thai]
MOE. (2021). Our Mission and Vision. Retrieved 20 February 2021, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/about-us/our-mission-and-vision
National Education Act 2019. (2019, 1 May) Government Gazette. (2019). Volume 136, chapter 57. Pages 49-53. in Thai]
Nordin, N. & Norman, H. (2018). Mapping the fourth industrial revolution global transformations on 21st century education on the context of sustainable development. Journal of sustainable development education and research | JSDER, 2(1), 1-7.
OECD. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. N.P.: OECD.
OECD. (2019). The future of education and skills Education 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030 A Series of Concept Notes. France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Office of the Education Council (2019). National Education Standards 2018. (1st edition). Bangkok: 21st Century. [in Thai]
Office of the Health Promotion Fund (Thai Health Promotion Foundation) and the RLG Institute (Rakluk Learning Group). (2018). EF Executive Funtions for children ages 13-18 for parents and teachers. Bangkok: ID All Digital Print. [in Thai]
Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved 15 April 2019, from https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
Rakluke Learning Grou. (2018). EF (executive functions). Retrieved from https://www.rakluke.com/brain/ [in Thai]
Razzouk, R. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?. Review of Educational Research, 82(3). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258183173_What_Is_Design_Thinking_and_Why_Is_It_Important
Siribanpitak et al. (2018). Developing a Mechanism to Drive the Production System and Developing High-Performance Teachers for Thailand 4.0. Bangkok: Prigwhan Graphic. [in Thai]
Sribuaiam, K. (2016). Environmental justice (Research Report). N.P.: Institute of Education Policy sponsored by the Conrad Adenau Foundation. [in Thai]
Thaweephok, T. (2015). A great feature of entrepreneurs, small and medium enterprises (Research Report). Bangkok: business and enterprise development incubator Thonburi Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
The council of the european union. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&rid=7
UNESCO. (2019). Assessment of Transversal Competencies Current tools in the Asian Region. N.P.: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Venn, A. (2019). Social justice and climate change. Managing Global Warming An Interface of Technology and Human. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/intergenerational-equity
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
