Critical Educational Policy Analysis: Concepts and Processes

Main Article Content

Chadchai Khogkhao
Ekkarin Sungtong

Abstract

This article aims to present a conceptual framework for the critical analysis of educational policies that emphasize equality across all sectors of education. The framework consists of five primary focal points: 1) educational policy analysis 2) critical analysis of educational policies framework 3) relevant research on policy analysis and 4) limitations in policy analysis. To apply the synthesized framework for policy analysis, it becomes possible to critically assess the outcomes of diverse educational policies. The framework offers a lens through which to evaluate how these policies strive to achieve equality, diminish educational disparities, and enhance the quality
of education in Thailand both presently and in the future. Recognizing the constraints and taking into consideration the recommendations outlined, this article contributes to fostering a more equitable and progressive educational landscape in thecountry.
 

Article Details

How to Cite
Khogkhao, C. . ., & Sungtong, E. . . (2024). Critical Educational Policy Analysis: Concepts and Processes. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 35(1), 37–51. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edupsu/article/view/260007
Section
Academic Article

References

Ahmed, I. K. & Dantata, B. S., (2016). Problems and Challenges of Policy Implementation for National Development. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(15), 60-65.

Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Open University Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., Green-Pedersen, C., & Jones, B. D. (2006). Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European public policy, 13(7), 959-974.

Cheng, Y. C., & Cheung, W. M. (1995). A framework for the analysis of educational policies. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(6), 10-21

Cochran, C. E., Mayer, L. C., Carr, T. R., Cayer, N. J., & McKenzie, M. (2012). American public policy: An introduction. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Cooper, R. (2004). Hard power, solf power and goals of diplomacy. In: D. Held & M. Koenig-Archibugi, (Eds). Smerican Power in the 21st Century. Polity Press.

Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068-1090.

Diem, S., & Young, M. D. (2015). Considering critical turns in research on educational policy. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 838-850.

Diem, S. (2017). A critical policy analysis of the politics, design, and implementation of student assignment policies. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 43-62). Springer International Publishing.

Eppley, K. (2009). Rural schools and the highly qualified teacher provision of No Child Left Behind: A critical policy analysis. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(4), 1-11.

Fernández, E., & López, G. R. (2017). When parents behave badly: A critical policy analysis of parent involvement in schools. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 111-130). Springer International

Publishing.

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.

Fowler, A. (2000). The quality of aid and development partnership. Focus, 63, 9-11.

George, R. C., Maier, R., & Robson, K. (2020). Ignoring race: A comparative analysis of education policy in British Columbia and Ontario. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(2), 159-179.

Hallsworth, M., Parker, S., & Rutter, J. (2011). Policy Making in the Real World: Evidence and Analysis, Institute for Government, UK.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Kretchmar, K. (2014). Democracy (in) action: A critical policy analysis of New York City public school closings by teachers, students, administrators, and community members. Education and Urban Society, 46(1), 3-29.

Lasswell, H. D. & Kaplan, A. (1970). Power and Society. Yale University press.

Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23, 767–795.

Llewellyn, J., Hancock, G., Kirst, M. & Roeloffs, K.A. (1982). Perspective on Education in Hong Kong: Report by a Visiting Panel. Hong Kong Government Printer.

Malley, M. P., & Long, T. A. (2017). Public educational policy as performance: A queer analysis. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 63-82). Switzerland.

Mansfield, K. C., Welton, A. D., & Grogan, M. (2014). “Truth or consequences”: A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1155-1182.

McDonnell, L. M. (2009). A political science perspective in education policy analysis. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 57-70). New York, NY: Routledge.

Mondy, R. W., Sharplin, A. & Flippo, E. B. (1988). Management: Concepts and Practices. Allyn and Bacon.

Morrow, R. A, & Brown, D. D. (1994). Critical theory and methodology. Sage Publications.

Milani, M., & Winton, S. (2017). Ontario’s fourth ‘r’: A critical democratic analysis of Ontario’s fund-‘r’aising policy. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 193-214). - Springer International Publishing.

Mestry, R. (2014). A critical analysis of the National Norms and Standards for School Funding policy: Implications for social justice and equity in South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 851-867.

Popkewitz, T. S. (2000). Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community. SUNY Press.

Rodcharoen, P. (2002). Project Management. Netikun Printing. [in Thai]

Sanrattana, W. (2000). Educational policy process from the political system to the bureaucracy: Problems, Obstacles and Solution. Thiphayawisut. [in Thai]

Srisa-an, W. & Wongsothon, T. (2008). Policy concepts and principles. Publisher, Department of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat University. [in Thai]

Taylor, P.C., & Taylor, E. (2019). Transformative STEAM education for sustainable development. Proceedings of the Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC), November 2-4, 2018. Taylor & Francis.

Thamrongthanyawong, S. (2002). Public Policy: Concepts, Analysis and Process. (8th ed.). Sematham Publication. [in Thai]

Thrupp, M., & Tomlinson, S. (2005). Introduction: Education policy, social justice and ‘complex hope’. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 549-556.

Welton, A. D., Harris, T. O., Altamirano, K., & Williams, T. (2017). The politics of student voice: Conceptualizing a model for critical analysis. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 83-110). Springer.

Young, M. D., & Diem, S. (Eds.) (2017). Introduction to critical policy analysis. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 1-13). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Young, M. D., & Reynolds, A. L. (2017). Critically examining policy workers and policy work within state boards of education. In M. D.

Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 19-42). Switzerland: Springer

International Publishing.