Post Occupancy Evaluation of 1st Floor Rapee Building, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon

Main Article Content

Peerakant Roonmaneerut
Phiphat Jaraphet
Thanapon Limtattanakul

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) evaluate existing problems and user satisfaction regarding the physical environment on the 1st floor of Rapee Building, (2) investigate the behaviors and spatial needs of the building users, and (3) propose guidelines for space improvement and allocation to align with user activities. The research used a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected via questionnaires from 132 students, faculty, and staff. Qualitative data were collected through field surveys, observations, and photographs. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Findings showed moderate satisfaction with the physical environment (ð‘ĨĖ… = 2.69–3.28, SD = 0.93–1.10). The space’s potential as a Co-working space rated highest (ð‘ĨĖ… = 3.28, SD = 1.10; the quantity and size of Co-working space rated lowest (ð‘ĨĖ… = 2.69, SD = 1.09). Respondents highly supported developing a Co-working space (ð‘ĨĖ… = 4.24, SD = 0.80). Desired features included electrical outlets/USB ports/internet (86.4%), movable furniture (81.1%), and rest or quiet zones (75.8%). In conclusion, the proposed design guidelines suggest that the first-floor area of the Rapee Building possesses significant potential for adaptive transformation into a co-working space. However, such transformation necessitates a systematic enhancement of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), encompassing cleanliness, safety, ventilation, lighting, and effective wayfinding and signage systems. Furthermore, the adoption of a flexible modular design approach and the implementation of structured co-management strategies are essential to support multifunctional use. Collectively, these measures would enable the space to function as a contemporary learning hub and contribute to the sustainable enhancement of the value and usability of the existing building.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roonmaneerut, P., Jaraphet, P., & Limtattanakul, T. (2026). Post Occupancy Evaluation of 1st Floor Rapee Building, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 8(2), 69–91. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jadc/article/view/283074
Section
Research Articles

References

āļŠāļ™āļąāļŠ āļ„āļ‡āļŦāļīāļĢāļąāļ āđāļĨāļ° āļŠāļąāļĒāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒ āļ”āđˆāļēāļ™āļāļīāļ•āļ•āļīāļāļļāļĨ. (2018). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļžāļķāļ‡āļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢ: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāļ„āļ“āļ°āļĻāļīāļĨāļ›āļ§āļīāļˆāļīāļ•āļĢ āļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļĻāļīāļĨāļ›āđŒ āļĻāļēāļĨāļēāļĒāļē, āļˆāļąāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļąāļ”āļ™āļ„āļĢāļ›āļāļĄ. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 11(1), 3775–3789. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/165545

āļŠāļĒāļļāđ€āļĢāļ• āļ§āļ‡āļĐāļēāđ€āļ™āļēāļ§āđŒ āđāļĨāļ° āļāļēāļ“āļīāļ™āļ—āļĢāđŒ āļĢāļąāļāļ§āļ‡āļĻāđŒāļ§āļēāļ™. (2023). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢ: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļ™āļ§āļąāļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāļŠāļ–āļēāļ›āļąāļ•āļĒāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļ„āļ“āļ°āļŠāļ–āļēāļ›āļąāļ•āļĒāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļĢāļēāļŠāļĄāļ‡āļ„āļĨāļ˜āļąāļāļšāļļāļĢāļĩ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļĻāļīāļĨāļ›āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢ āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒ āđāļĨāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļŠāļĢāļĢāļ„āđŒ, 10(1), 163–181. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arts/article/view/266487

āļšāļļāļāđ‚āļ• āļ™āļēāļ”āļĩ āđāļĨāļ° āļ‚āļˆāļĢāļĻāļąāļāļ”āļīāđŒ āļŠāļ‡āļ§āļ™āļŠāļąāļ•āļĒāđŒ. (2023). āļāļēāļĢāļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ āļēāļžāļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™ (Co-working space) āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļ™āļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ„āļĢāļđāđƒāļ™āļĒāļļāļ„āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ•āļ­āļšāļŠāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļļāļ“āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāđƒāļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 21 āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļŠāļļāļĢāļīāļ™āļ—āļĢāđŒ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļ„āļĢāļ­āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļ™āļ§āļąāļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ–āļīāđˆāļ™, 7(3), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.14456/jlgisrru.2023.51

āļ›āļĢāļīāļāļāđŒ āļ‡āļēāļĄāļŠāļļāļ—āļ˜āļī. (2023). āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļ‡ Co-working space āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ› āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĄāļŦāļēāļŠāļēāļĢāļ„āļēāļĄ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢ āļ›āļ‚āļĄ., 12(1), 87–95. https://www.council-uast.com/journal/journal-detail.php?id=38

āļ āļđāļĢāļĩ āļ­āļģāļžāļąāļ™āļŠāļļāļ‚ āđāļĨāļ° āļ§āļīāļĄāļĨāļĢāļąāļ•āļ™āđŒ āļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ™āļđāļ. (2019). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļ­āļĒāļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļŠāļĢāļĢāļ„āđŒ: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāđƒāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļ™āļļāļĢāļąāļāļĐāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ°āļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ, 3, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2018.1400

āļĄāļēāļĢāļļāļ•āļžāļ‡āļĻāđŒ āļĒāļ°āļ§āļ‡āļĐāļē. (2017). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļžāļķāļ‡āļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĻāļđāļ™āļĒāđŒāļāļĨāļēāļ‡āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆ āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ [āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļ„āļ§āđ‰āļēāļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āļ›āļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•, āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ]. Thammasat University Institutional Repository. https://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2017/TU_2017_5916033110_7690_8285.pdf

āļĒāļīāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļīāđŒ āđ„āļŠāļĒāļāļļāļĨ. (2024). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļ§āļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āļąāļāļĐāļ°āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ™āđāļāđˆāļ™. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āđāļ§āļ”āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļŠāļĢāļĢāļ„āđŒāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āļīāļ™āļīāļˆāļ‰āļąāļĒ, 23(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2024.5

āļ§āļĢāļēāļĢāļąāļ•āļ™āđŒ āļœāļĨāļ—āļ§āļĩ. (2013). āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ­āļēāļ„āļēāļĢ: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĻāļđāļ™āļĒāđŒāļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļĄāļąāļ„āļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļž āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāđ€āļ‚āļ•āļāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ™āđ‰āļģāđ„āļ— [āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļ™āļīāļžāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļ›āļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•, āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļž]. Bangkok University Institutional Repository. http://dspace.bu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/990

āļ§āļĩāļĢāļžāļĨ āļžāļ·āļŠāļ˜āļąāļāļāļēāļāļīāļˆ. (2019). āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļē co-working space āļšāļĢāļīāđ€āļ§āļ“āļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē: āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļšāļĢāļīāđ€āļ§āļ“āļŠāļĒāļēāļĄāļŠāđāļ„āļ§āļĢāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļēāļĄāļĒāđˆāļēāļ™. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ°āļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ, 2, 176–186.

Ahmadi, R. T., Saiki, D., & Ellis, C. (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation of an academic building: Lessons to learn. Journal of Applied Sciences and Arts, 1(2), Article 4.

Ahmed, H. E., El-Sharkawy, M. O., Elattar, S. M., & Abdel-Mawla, M. M. (2021). Post-occupancy evaluation of school refurbishing projects: Multiple case study in the UK. Buildings, 11(4), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040169

Baharetha, S., Hassanain, M. A., Alshibani, A., Ouis, D., Gomaa, M. M., & Ezz, M. S. (2025). A post-occupancy evaluation framework for enhancing resident satisfaction and building performance in multi-story residential developments in Saudi Arabia. Architecture, 5(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture5010008

Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439

Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.

Ezz, M. S., Mahdy, M. A. F., Baharetha, S., Hassanain, M. A., & Gomaa, M. M. (2025). Post-occupancy evaluation of architectural design studio facilities. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, Article 1549313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1549313

Hassanain, M. A., Amer, A. J., & Al-Hammad, A. M. (2023). Design quality assessment of campus facilities through post-occupancy evaluation. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(4), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0057

Hassanain, M. A., Sanni-Anibire, M. O., & Mahmoud, A. S. (2024). An assessment of users’ satisfaction with a smart building on university campus through post-occupancy evaluation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-12-2021-0714

Horgen, T., & Sheridan, S. (1996). Post-occupancy evaluation of facilities: A participatory approach to programming and design. Facilities, 14(7/8), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779610123344

Hou, H., Lai, J. H. K., & Edwards, D. (2020). Gap theory-based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) of dormitory building performance: A case study and a comparative analysis. Building and Environment, 185, Article 107312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107312

Irish, J. (2022). Ten years on: A post-occupancy evaluation of classrooms for pupils with severe autism. Facilities, 40(9/10), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-10-2021-0097

Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.512629

Preiser, W. F. E., Hardy, A. E., & Schramm, U. (Eds.). (2018). Building performance evaluation: From delivery process to life cycle phases (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1

Wener, R. (1989). Advances in evaluation of the built environment. In E. H. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (Vol. 2, pp. 287–313). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0717-4_9

Zhao, J., Aziz, F. B., Deng, Y., Ujang, N., & Xiao, Y. (2024). A review of comprehensive post-occupancy evaluation feedback on occupant-centric thermal comfort and building energy efficiency. Buildings, 14(9), Article 2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092892