Factors and Indicators in Quality Assessment of Urban Public Spaces According to Perception of People with Special Needs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public spaces that promote learning and quality of life for people with special needs in Bangkok was limited. Those spaces are not only physical spaces, but includes social space and interaction between individuals. This study aims to illustrate indicators quality of urban public spaces according to perception of people with special needs. By reviewing related literature to develop elements and indicators indicate accessibility and usage of public spaces in Bangkok. An assessment form was created and verify by 4 experts, then trying out with 20 people with special needs or caretakers of people with special needs. Data were analyzed by using frequency, mean, standard deviation, IOC, reliability and content analysis. Findings found that there are 4 elements 10 indicator indicated the quality of public spaces in Bangkok according to perception of people with special needs which are 1) usage and activities comprised 3 indicators, 2) access and linkages comprised 2 indicators, 3) sociability comprised 2 indicators, and 4) perception comprised 3 indicators.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
under process
References
ภาษาไทย
ณัฐกุล ตันติไพจิตร. (2556). สนามเด็กเล่นสำหรับเด็กพิเศษ [สารนิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต ไม่ได้ตีพิมพ์]. มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร. http://www.thapra.lib.su.ac.th/objects/thesis/fulltext/
thapra/Nattakun_Tantiphaichit/fulltext.pdf
ณิชาพร ศรีเพชรดี. (2561ก). EP.1: The twelve senses ปรัชญาการเติบโตของมนุษย์ตั้งแต่ระดับ ‘เซลล์’
และ ‘โซล’. Thepotential. https://thepotential.org/knowledge/the-twelve-senses-1/
ณิชาพร ศรีเพชรดี. (2561ข). EP.2: The twelve senses ปรัชญาการเติบโตของมนุษย์ตั้งแต่ระดับ ‘เซลล์’
และ ‘โซล’. Thepotential. https://thepotential.org/knowledge/the-twelve-senses-2/
ณิชาพร ศรีเพชรดี. (2561ค). EP.3: The twelve senses ปรัชญาการเติบโตของมนุษย์ตั้งแต่ระดับ ‘เซลล์’
และ ‘โซล’. Thepotential. https://thepotential.org/knowledge/the-twelve-senses-3/
ณิชากร ศรีเพชรดี. (2562). The 12 senses กับหมอปอง: ทำไมเด็กรุ่นใหม่ไม่รู้จักกาลเทศะ ไม่เห็นอก
เห็นใจ และไม่มี common sense. Thepotential. https://thepotential.org/knowledge
/doctor-pong-12-senses/
ภาคีเครือข่ายการศึกษาเพื่อการเยียวยา. (2564). โลกวิเศษเพราะคนพิเศษ: คู่มือสังคมไทยเข้าใจคนพิเศษ เล่ม 1. กู๊ดเฮด พริ้นท์ติ้ง แอนด์แพคเกจจิ้ง กรุ๊ป. http://www.curativethailand.com/pdfbook/Loose%20Part%20Filp/201/01_2021-10-29_06-39-33.html
วารี ถิระจิตร. (2541). การศึกษาสําหรับเด็กพิเศษ. สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สรินยา ศรีเพชราวุธ. (2562). การทํากิจกรรมบําบัด Sensory Integration.
https://home.kku.ac.th/autistic/th/images/stories/docandpdf/si.pdf
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Case, B. J. (2003). Universal Design. Pearson.
Children with Special Needs. (2019). M&L special needs planning.
https://specialneedsplanning.net/children-with-special-needs/
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, United Kingdom [CABE]. (2006). The principles of inclusive design (They include you). Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
Gehl, J., & Gemzoe, L. (1996). Public Spaces Public Life. Forlag.
Pineda, V. S., & Corburn, J. (2020). Disability, Urban health equity, and the Coronavirus pandemic: Promoting cities for all. Journal Urban Health, 98(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00437-7
Project for Public Spaces [PPS]. (2000). How to turn a place around: A handbook for creating successful public spaces. PPS.
Public space & the right to the city. (2019). uclg-planning. https://www.uclg-planning.org/public-space-right-city
Pupphachai. U. (2019). Quality of urban space. https://medium.com/umapupphachai/quality-of-urban-space-2f749900f320
Rad, V. R., & Ngah, I. B. (2014). Assessment of quality of public urban spaces. Sci.Int(Lahore), 26(1), 335-338. http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/200550752865-335-338--Bigdeli%20Rad--SS--MALAYSIA--PAID[2]%20GP%20Revised%20Back.pdf
Salama, A. M., Remali, A. M., & MacLean, L. (2017). Characterisation and System Assessment of Urban Open Spaces in Glasgow City Center. Spatium, 37(June 2017), 22 -33. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737022S
Sepe, M. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic and public spaces: Improving quality and flexibility for healthier place. Urban Design International, 26, 159 – 173. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41289-021-00153-x
Waldorf publication. (2016a1). Twelve senses: Not just five in the human being - part I.
https://www.waldorfpublications.org/blogs/book-news/twelve-senses-not-just-five-in-
the-human-being
Waldorf publication. (2016a2). Twelve senses: Not just five in the human being - part III.
https://www.waldorfpublications.org/blogs/book-news/twelve-senses-not-just-five-in-
the-human-being-part-3?_pos=1&_sid=8eba16b8b&_ss=rr
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. The Conservation Foundation.
Wojnarowska, A. (2016). Model for assessment of public space quality in town centers. European Spatial Research and Policy, 23(1), 82-109. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_18845
Zandieh, R., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., & Zandieh, M. (2020). Adaptability of public spaces and mental health inequalities during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health, 6, 5. https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal-6-covid19-public-spaces.html
