Development of a Program Theory to Evaluate the Policy of Managing Education for the Life-Quality Improvement Based on Environmentally-Friendly Approaches
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to develop a program theory to evaluate the policy of managing education for the life-quality improvement based on environmentally-friendly approaches in schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The development comprised 3 steps: Step 1, drafting the preliminary program theory conceptual framework from the study of related documents and researches with document synthesis, Step 2, adjusting the program theory conceptual framework in the light of comments and suggestions of intended users by synthesizing data from semi-structured interviews, Step 3, checking the feasibility of the program theory from the data collected from the actual performance of the schools under the case study by comparing the performance of the school, using the data recorded. The results revealed that the program theory for evaluation of the policy of managing education for the life-quality improvement based on environmentally-friendly approaches consisted of 9 factors and 25 indicators. That is, Part 1, evaluation of policy implementation comprised: 3-factor interventions which were policy communication, policy monitoring, and resource support; 3-factor determinants which were understanding the policy, attitude and acceptance of the policy, and policy setting in schools; and 1-factor outcome which was policy-based organizing for learning. Part 2, policy outcome evaluation comprised: 2-factor outcomes which were environmental change from learning and environmental literacy in the students.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information contained in the published article in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University represent the opinions and responsibilities of the authors directly. The editorial board of the journal is not necessarily in agreement with or responsible for any of the content.
The articles, data, content, images, etc. that have been published in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University are copyrighted by the journal. If any individual or organization wishes to reproduce or perform any actions involving the entirety or any part of the content, they must obtain written permission from the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University.
References
Aber, J. L., Tubbs, C., Halpin, P. F., Johnstone, B., Starkey, L., Shivshanker, A., Annan, J., Seidman, E. and Wolf, S. (2017). Promoting children’s learning and development in conflict-affected countries: Testing change process in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 53–67.
Abildgaard, J. S., Nielsen, K., Wahlin-Jacobsen, C.D., Maltesen, T., Christensen, K.B. and Holtermann, A. (2019). 'Same, but different': a mixed methods realist evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled participatory organizational intervention. Human Relations, 73(10), 1339-1365.
Anderson, J. E. (2006). Public policy making 3th edition. Houghton Mifflin.
Chen, H. T. (2012). Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement. in Strobl, R. Lobermeier, O. and Heitmeyer, W. (Editor), Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten für eine demokratische Kultur (p. 17-40). Springer VS.
Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Chikati, T. M. and Okendo, E. O. (2018). Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Integrated Environmental Education in the Secondary School Curriculum for Managing Environmental Degradation in Machakos Sub County, Kenya. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(07), 4881-4889.
Deane, K. L. and Harre, N. (2014). Program theory-driven evaluation science in a youth development context. Evaluation and Program Planning, 45, 61–70.
Desfandi, M., Sri Maryani, E. F. and Disman, D. (2016). The Role of School Principal Leadership in Implementation of Eco School Program as the Effort to Support Sustainable Development. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 14. 197-200.
Ford, J. A., Jones, A., Wong G., Clark, A., Porter, T. and Steel, N. (2018). Access to primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: exploring realist theory using structural equation modelling in a linked dataset. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0514-x
Harman, E. and Azzam, T. (2017). Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 83–194.
Hawkins, J. A. (2016). Realist evaluation and randomized controlled trials for testing program theory in complex social systems. Evaluation, 22(3), 270–285.
Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. North American Association for Environmental Education.
Maluleke, H. M. (2015). Curriculum Policy Implementation in the South African Context, with reference to Environmental Education within the natural Sciences [Docteral dissertation]. University of South Africa. http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/18678/thesis_maluleke_hm.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Marable, S. A. (2014). Green Schools – The Implementation and Practices of Environmental Education in Lead and used Green Ribbon Public Schools in Virginia. Educational Planning. 22(1), 49-65.
Maryono (2015). The Implementation of the Environmental Education at “Adiwiyata” Schools in Pacitan Regency (An Analysis of the Implementation of Grindle Model Policy). Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 31-42.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Education Policy Implementation: a Literature Review and Proposed Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-policy-implementation_fc467a64-en
Rossi, P. H. and Freeman, H. E. (1993). My views of evaluation and their origins. In Alkin, Marvin C., ed. Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. SAGE Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L. and Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. A Wiley Imprint.
Chandarasorn, V. (2010). The police implementation monitoring and evaluation: lessons from education policy. in Office of the Education Council. (2017). (Editor), Manual for educational policy development and planning (p. 1-32). Prigwhan Graphic Company Limited. (in Thai)
Gerdruang, A. (2018). Principles of public policy evaluation. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Kanjanawasee, S. (2017). Realist Evaluation with Theory-Driven Evaluation. The Social Science Research Association of Thailand Missive. 4(1). 3-13. (in Thai)
Ketsuwan, R. (2012). Public policy evaluation. Bophit Printing. (in Thai)
Khaikleng, P. (2012). Development of a program theory for evaluating the success of education reform policy implementation in schools by using inductive and deductive approaches [Doctoral dissertation]. Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Fiscal year policy 2017 of office of the basic education commission. http://www.petburi.go.th/web/index.php?option=com_
content&view=article&id=765:-2560-&catid=37:2012-11-08-09-01-22 (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017A). Manual for environmental education sustainable development school. (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017B). Fiscal year policy 2018 of office of the basic education commission. https://www.obec.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/obec61.pdf (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018A). Fiscal year policy 2019 of office of the basic education commission. https://www.obec.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/OBECPolicy62.pdf (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018B). Annual report 2017. http://203.159.164.40/~webmaster/doc/2560e-Book.pdf (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2019). Fiscal year policy 2020 of office of the basic education commission. http://www.yst2.go.th/web/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/OBEC-policy-2563.pdf (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2008). The study report on current conditions, problems and trends, the context of global and Thai society changes under globalization environmental and energy. Prigwhan Graphic Company Limited. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2017A). The national education plan b.e.2560-2579 (2017-2036). Prigwhan Graphic Company Limited. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2019). Education development guidelines for environmentally friendly growth. Prigwhan Graphic Company Limited. (in Thai)