The Effect of Prewriting Techniques on Yemeni EFL Tertiary Learners’ Writing Skills
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present studyinvestigated theeffectof prewritingtechniquesonYemeni
EFL tertiary learners’ writing skills and explored the improved writing aspects due to
the use of these techniques. The study was quasi-experimental with intact groups
and adopted a Pre-test and Post-test Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Only two
groups of the first level students at the Department of English, Faculty of Education,
Sana’a University, Yemen were chosen as intact groups and assigned randomly as
experimental and control groups. A composition proficiency test as a pre-test was
administered shortly beforeconducting the experimental treatment tocheck thehomogeneity among the participants. During sixteen sessions and over a period of two
months, thetreatment took place.Theexperimental group subjects weretrained and
exposed tosix different prewriting techniques, whilethesubjectsof thecontrol group
werenotexposed tothosesixtechniques.Shortlyafter thetreatment period wasover,
the post-test was administered. Immediately after the post-test, the subjects of the
experimental group wereasked torespond toa short interview (Talk aloud protocol).
The subjects of the experimental group showed statistically significant improvement
in their written performance. Further investigation was carried out and the results
revealed that theorganizationof ideas and content were the most improved aspects
of writing due to the use of prewriting techniques
Article Details
- ต้นฉบับที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบุรีรัมย์ สาขามนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ ถือเป็นกรรมสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบุรีรัมย์ ห้ามนำข้อความทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนไปพิมพ์ซ้ำเว้นเสียแต่ว่าจะได้รับอนุญาตจากมหาวิทยาลัยฯ เป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร
- เนื้อหาต้นฉบับที่ปรากฏในวารสารเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาด อันเกิดจากเทคนิคการพิมพ์
References
(EFL Classed in Yemen). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Deccan College,
Postgraduate Research Institute, India.
Al-Mahfadi, H. (2005). AnInvestigationof theProcess Writing Strategies Applied by the
Students of English Department, Faculty of Education, Sana’a University.
Unpublished M.A. thesis. Faculty of Education, Sana’a University.
Baru, S. (1998). The Effect of Pre-writing Activities on the Performance of Low Ability
Students in Their Descriptive Writing. Retrieved December, 11, 2008, from
http://www.eltrec.ukm.my/e-thesis-view.asp?thesis-ID=141
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc. New Jersey.
D’Aoust, C. (1986)TeachingWritingasaProcess. In A. Oluwadiya(1992).SomePrewriting
Techniques for Student Writers. English Teaching Forum, 30(4), 12-32.
Ericsson, K., and Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review,
87 (3), 215-251.
Hamp-Lyons, L. and Heasley, B. (1987). Study Writing: A course in written English
for academic and professional purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Hartfiel, V. F., Hughey, J. B., Wormuth, D. R., and Jacobs, H. L. (1985). Learning ESL
Composition. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Hashempour, Z., Rostampour, M., and Bahjat, F. (2015) The effect of brainstorming
as a prewriting strategy on EFL advanced learners’ writing ability. Journal
of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(1), 86-99
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Leedy,P. D.and Ormrod, J.E. (2005).PracticalResearch:Planningand Design.Pearson.
(8th edition). Education International. Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mahnam, L. and Nejadansari, D. (2012) The effect of different pre-writing strategies
on Iranian EFL writing achievement. International Education Studies, 5(1),
154-160
Naif, M. (2003). A StudyofYemeni EFL CollegeStudent Writers CompositionStrategies
and Skills. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. College of Languages, University
of Sana’a, Yemen
Oluwadiya, A. (1992).SomePrewritingTechniques forStudent Writers.EnglishTeaching
Forum, 30(4), 12-32.
Pope, C. and Prater, D. L. (1990). Writing Proficiency and Student Use of Prewriting/
Invention Strategies. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(4): 64-70.
Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL Students Do as They Write: A Classroom Study
of Composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.
Richards, J. (1990).From Meaning into Words: Writing inaSecond orForeignLanguage.
The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge University Press. 100-117.
Seliger, H. W. and Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research Method. Oxford
University Press.
Shamsher, M. (1994). Problems of Cohesion and Coherence in the Writing
of Non - Native Advanced Learners of English: The Case of 4th Year English
Specialists College of Education, Sana’a University, The Republic of Yemen.
Yemen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.The UniversityofStrathclyde,Britain.
Sharyan, A. (2007). Undergraduate Courses Handbook. Departmentof English, Faculty
of Education, University of Sana’a.
Spack,R. (1984). InventionStrategies. And theESL College CompositionStudent.TESOL
Quarterly, 18(4),649-670.
Thalheimer, W., & Cook,S. (2002, August). How tocalculateeffect sizes frompublished
research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved March 31, 2009 from
http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm.
Wasko,B. (2011).3Prewritingstrategies forany writing.Retrieved August,10,2016, from
http://blog.writeathome.com/index.php/2011/08/3-prewriting-strategies-
for-any-writing-project/
Zamel, V. (1981). Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. TESOL Quarterly,
16(2), 195-209