Built Environment and Users’ Behavior in Co-sharing Spaces: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Modern Real Estate Development in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The goal of this comparative study is to provide real estate developers, urban planners, and architects with a deeper understanding of the development and management of the built environment and users’ behaviour. This understanding can serve as an alternative investment strategy for the changing demands of the new target market. The main objectives of this research are 1) to study the behaviour of tenants and visitors in the environment of modern types of real estate development of the co-sharing spaces consisting of co-working space, serviced offices, and hostels and 2) to compare the modern types with traditional types of real estate consisting of home-based work/ café, traditional offices, and hotels. An in-depth structured interview of 19 samples was conducted as the primary approach to collecting information based on real estate in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR), Thailand.
The result of this study reveals that the built environments of modern real estate types differ significantly from traditional types, particularly in terms of design objectives (functional, aesthetic, and symbolic). This difference also influences users’ physical determinism, which affects overt behaviour comprising personal space, territoriality, and privacy. However, this decline in overt behaviour does not imply a disadvantage in developing modern types of real estate projects. On the contrary, due to the users' underlying concerns, developers can adapt these development concepts to enhance project opportunities in particular dimensions of cost-saving, focus and convenience, and new experiences. Therefore, properly balancing design objectives (aesthetic, symbolic, and functional aspects) and overt behavior (personal space, territoriality, and privacy) is crucial to conveying the success of development purposes for the new generations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารสถาปัตยกรรม การออกแบบและการก่อสร้าง คณะสถาปัตยกรรมศาสตร์ ผังเมืองและนฤมิตศิลป์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม
References
Alitajer, S., & Nojoumi, G. M. (2016). Privacy at Home: Analysis of Behavioral Patterns in the Spatial Configuration of Traditional and Modern Houses in The City of Hamedan Based on the Notion of Space Syntax. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(3), 341-352.
Appraisal Institute. (2013). The Appraisal of Real Estate,14, Illinois: Appraisal Institute.
Archea, J. (1977). The Place of Architectural Factors in Behavioral Theories of Privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 116-137.
Bechtel, R. (1997). Environment and Behavior: An Introduction. USA: SAGE Publications.
Bell, P., Greene, T., Fisher, J., & Baum, A. (2005). Environmental Psychology. New York: Psychology Place.
Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, April.
Bailey, D. W. (1990). The Living House: Signifying Continuity. The Social Archaeology of Houses, 19–48.
Bosker, B. (2003). Original Copies: Architectural Mimicry in Contemporary China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Brett, D.L. and Schmitz, A. (2009). Real Estate Market Analysis: Methods and Case Studies. 2nd ed. ULI. Washington D.C.
Brunia, S. and Hartjes-Gosselink, A. (2009). Personalisation in Non-Territorial Offices: A Study of A Human Need. Journal of Corporate Real Estate,11 (3), 169-182
Bunz, K. R., Henze, G. P., & Tiller, D. K. (2006). Survey of Sustainable Building Design Practices in North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12(1), 33–62.
Chan, J. K. H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Sharing Space: Urban Sharing, Sharing A Living Space, and Shared Social Spaces. Space and Culture, 24(1), 157–169.
Freund, D., & Munsters, W. (2004). Developments in the Hotel Industry: Design Meets Historic Properties. XIII International Tourism and Leisure Symposium" Tourism Brands for Competitiveness" 2004, Barcelona (Spain).
Fritz, W. (1996). Real Estate Appraisal Concepts. Economic Development Review, Winter, 14 (1).
Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice. Colville, WA: Optimal Book.
Guntermann, K. and Norrbin, S. (1987). Explaining the Variability of Apartment Rents. AREUEA Journal, Winter, 15 (4),321-340
Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008). Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic. Built environment, 34(2), 161-181.
Horayangkura, V. Sedworakit, B. and Ginmalai, S. (2011). Environmental Psychology: Principles of Creativity and Environmental Management. Bangkok: GBP Center Co., Ltd.
Ittelson, W., Proshansky, H., Rivlin, L. and Winkel, G. (1974). An Introduction to Environmental Psychology.USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Jacobus, C. (2009). Real Estate Principles, 11, USA: Cengage Learning.
Kaya, N., & Weber, M. J. (2003). Territorial Behavior in Residence Halls: A Cross-Cultural Study. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 400-414.
Khazanchi, S., Sprinkle, T. A., Masterson, S. S., & Tong, N. (2018). A Spatial Model of Work Relationships: The Relationship-Building and Relationship-Straining Effects of Workspace Design. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 590-609.
Kim, J., Erdem, M., & Kim, B. (2024). Hi Alexa, Do Hotel Guests have Privacy Concerns with You?: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33(3), 360-383.
Kim, H. S. (2009). Cross-Current Contribution: A Study on East Asian Influence on Modern Architecture in Europe. Architectural Research, 11(2), 9–18.
Kim, H. W., Gupta, s., & Koh, J. (2011). Investigating the Intention to Purchase Digital Items in Social Networking Communities: A Customer Value Perspective. Information and Management, Vol. 48(6), 228–234.
Kritsanaprakornkit, W. (2016). Aesthetics of the fake in Yuwadee Nirattrakul (Editor). Aesthetics of the Fake. Tourism Booklet. Vol.2 No.1 Jan- Mar 2016. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT).
Kupritz, V. W. (1998). Privacy In the Work Place: The Impact of Building Design. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(4), 341-356.
Lee, Y. S. (2010). Office Layout Affecting Privacy, Interaction, and Acoustic Quality In LEED-Certified Buildings. Building and Environment, 45(7), 1594-1600.
Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (2017). Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension. In People and Buildings. Routledge, 65-82
Mand, H. (2013). Asia: Identity, Architecture and Modernity. The Journal of Architecture, 18(1), 59–78.
Moon, H., Yu, J., Chua, B. L., & Han, H. (2022). Hotel Privacy Management and Guest Trust Building: A Relational Signaling Perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103171.
McAndrew, F. (1993). Environmental Psychology, California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
McAllister, P. (2001). Offices with Services or Serviced Offices? Exploring the Valuation Issues. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(4), 412-426.
McNeil, D. (2008). The hotel and the city. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 383–398.
Michon, Richard, Chebat, Jean-Charles, & Turley, L.W. (2005). Mall Atmospherics: the Interaction Effects of the Mall Environment on Shopping Behavior. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 58, 576- 583
Myerson, J., & Ross, P. (2006). Space to work: New office design. Laurence King Publishing.
Nordin, N. N., Mohd Baidzowi, F. M., & Razak, R. A. (2016). Understanding the Work At Home Concept, Its Benefits, and Challenges Towards Employees. Social Sciences Research, 109-118.
Özgüner, H. (2011). Cultural Differences in Attitudes towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces. Landscape Research, 36(5), 599-620.
Peca, S. P. (2009). Real Estate Development and Investment: A Comprehensive Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Pedersen. (1997). Psychological Functions of Privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, pp. 17, 147–156.
Penner, R. H., Adams, L., & Rutes, W. (2013). Hotel design, Planning and Development. Routledge.
Prebenson, Nina K. and Xie, JingHua (2017). Efficacy of Co-Creation and Mastering on Perceived Value and Satisfaction in Tourists' Consumption. Tourism Management, Vol. 60, 166-176
Rattanaprichavej, N. (2019). An Interaction of Architectural Design and Perceived Value toward Revisit Intention in Artificially Built Attractions. Real Estate Management and Valuation. Vol.27, No.3, 69-80
Rungruengpol, W. (2013). The New Real Estate Marketing. Home Buyer Guide Co., Ltd. Bangkok Thammasat University, Bangkok: G.B.P Co., Ltd.
Sandoval-Strausz, A. K. (2007). Hotel: An American history. Yale University Press.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption Values and Market Choices. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.Ltd.
Sinha, S. and Nayyar, P. (2000). Crowding Effects of Density and Personal Space Requirements among Older People: The Impact of Self- Control and Social Support, The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(6), 721-728
Stallworth, O. E., & Kleiner, B. H. (1996). Recent Developments in Office Design. Facilities, 14(1/2), 34-42.
Stea, D. (2017). Space, Territory and Human Movements. In The Structure of Political Geography. Routledge, 323-327
Sukpreecha, T. (2016). Copycat Culture in Yuwadee Nirattrakul (Editor). Aesthetics of the Fake. Tourism booklet. Vol.2 No.1 Jan- Mar 2016. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT).
Sundstrom, E., Burt, R. and Kamp, D. (1980). Privacy at Work: Architectural Correlates of Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 23(1), 101-117
Sweeney, J.C., & Soutar, Geoffrey N. (2001). Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77(2), 203–220.
Thumrongrattanarit, N. (2016). Simulating the Real Traveling in Yuwadee Nirattrakul (Editor). Aesthetics of the Fake. Tourism booklet. Vol.2 No.1 Jan- Mar 2016. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT).
Tufekcioglu, D. (2017). A Historical Comparative Analysis of European and Asian Interior Spaces through Cultural Background. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(11), 222-231.
Turley, L.W. and Milliman, R.E. (2000). Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 49, 193-211
Watson, K. J., Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Whitley, T. (2016). Re-conceiving Building Design Quality: A Review of Building Users in their Social Context. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(3), 509-523.
Weijs-Perrée, M., van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing User Preferences for Co-working Space Characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534-548.
Wurtzebach, C. and Miles, M. (1994). Modern Real Estate, 5, Edition, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Yeganeh, M., & Kamalizadeh, M. (2018). Territorial Behaviors and Integration Between Buildings And City In Urban Public Spaces Of Iran׳ S Metropolises. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(4), 588-599.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1998). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52(3), 2-22.