Applications Buddhadhamma in the Management of Government to Create A Harmonious Society in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research study on the application of Buddhist principles in public administration for reconciliation in Thai society Is a qualitative research With the objectives 1) to study the state of public administration for the reconciliation of Thai society 2) to analyze public administration and the principles of Buddhism in creating reconciliation in Thai society 3) to apply Buddhist principles in Public administration for reconciliation in Thai society By interviewing 10 experts using content analysis And document analysis.
The result of research : The results of the study of the state administration for the reconciliation of Thai society found that eliminating hatred by using peaceful means is negotiation for reasons. And compromise Strictly follow the rules of government administration. Organize activities for reconciliation Build good human relations in the organization by being together like brothers. Have an alternative justice system and mediators without prejudice Put yourself in other people's shoes The results of the analysis of public administration and the Buddhist principles of reconciliation in Thai society found that the principle of physical principles helps people to live with confidence. Saraniyadhamma Make people remember each other Love each other Helps to harmonize Principal Apiriyanitham Is a principle that creates harmony Helping to eliminate conflict, reconcile reconciliation, the principle of fairness is a process of respect and honor without insulting people. The result of applying Buddhist principles in public administration for reconciliation in Thai society found that stopping violence to stop fear With negotiation for a reason Strictly follow the rules of government administration. Administrators, agencies and staff in the organization must have a principle of fairness. Building confidence and trust to create harmony in Thai society
Article Details
บทความนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนผู้แต่ง กองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไป