Influence of CEO Characteristics, Ownership Structure, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SET100 Listed Companies in Thailand

Main Article Content

Rojana Khunkaew
weerawan siripong
Nuttanicha Siriprapa
Pheeranat Phanphuet
Aekkapat Sailimsarng

Abstract

       This study aims to investigate the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics such as gender, age, educational background, tenure and ownership structure such as family ownership and institutional investor ownership on the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of listed companies in the SET100 index of the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The data were collected from the annual reports, Form 56-1 One Report, and the Stock Exchange of Thailand database for the period 2020-2024. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used to examine the relationships between the independent variables (CEO characteristics-gender, age, education, and tenure-and ownership structure-family business and institutional investors) and the dependent variable, ESG performance.


       The results show that the CEO characteristics and ownership structure have significant relationships with ESG performance. Specifically, heterogeneous and experienced CEOs are more capable of facilitating sustainability practices. These findings highlight the significance of integrating the roles of corporate leadership and shareholders to improve the effectiveness of sustainability management in Thai firms. The findings provide practical guidance for executives, investors and regulators seeking to improve ESG performance and establish transparent and sustainable governance practices for the long term. 

Article Details

Section
ResearchArticles

References

References

Aabo, T., & Giorici, I. C. (2023). Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores? Global Finance Journal, 56, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100722

Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: The case of Jordan. SN Business & Economics, 1(12), 165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00167-1

Alrobai, F., & Albaz, M. M. (2025). The impact of CEO and firm attributes on ESG performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050268

Al-Shaer, H., Zaman, M., & Albitar, K. (2026). CEO gender, critical mass of board gender diversity and ESG performance: UK evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 48(1), 76–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-10-2023-0181

Amarna, K., López-Pérez, M. V., Garde Sánchez, R., & Rodríguez Ariza, L. (2025). ESG information disclosure and its relationship to tax practices: Stakeholder-friendly or legitimacy-seeking? Sustainable Development, 33(3), 3906–3917. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3333

Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., & McIlkenny, P. (2017). Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1

Detthamrong, U., Klangbunrueang, R., Chansanam, W., & Dasri, R. (2026). The impact of ESG performance on financial performance: Evidence from listed companies in Thailand. Forecasting, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8010014

Duan, Y., Li, L., & Yang, X. (2025). The impact of executive academic experience on corporate ESG performance. Innovation and Green Development, 4(2), 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100210

Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013

Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. https://hbr.org/2019/05/the-investor-revolution

Espinosa-Méndez, C., Maquieira, C. P., & Arias, J. T. (2023). The impact of ESG performance on the value of family firms: The moderating role of financial constraints and agency problems. Sustainability, 15(7), 6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076176

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018

García-Blandón, J., Argilés-Bosch, J. M., & Ravenda, D. (2019). Exploring the relationship between CEO characteristics and performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(6), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10447

García-Sánchez, I.-M., Hussain, N., Khan, S.-A., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2021). Do markets punish or reward corporate social responsibility decoupling? Business & Society, 60(6), 1431–1467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319898839

Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

Harasheh, M., & Provasi, R. (2023). A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2361

Hayes, A. S., & Miletzky, Y. (2025). Rethinking economic socialization: The intersection of culture, gender and economic life in a religious enclave. Socio-Economic Review, 23(3), 1383–1412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae063

Izcan, D., & Bektas, E. (2022). The relationship between ESG scores and firm-specific risk of Eurozone banks. Sustainability, 14(14), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148619

Kapil, S., & Rawal, V. (2023). Sustainable investment and environmental, social, and governance investing: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1429–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12588

Khalid, F., Sun, J., Guo, J., & Srivastava, M. (2024). Green corporate image: Assessing the effects of climate change management practices on corporate reputation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 1786–1801. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2663

Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008

Latella, P., Pisani, R., Quarato, F., & Tenuta, P. (2026). Family ownership and ESG performance: The moderating role of sustainability committee and ESG-linked executive compensation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70578

Li, J., Zhu, Y., & Ma, T. (2025). The impact of the CEO’s green experience on corporate ESG performance: Based on the upper echelons theory perspective. Sustainability, 17(15), 6859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156859

Liao, E., & Jesmin, F. H. (2023). Corporate ownership and firm’s ESG performance: A study of Swedish listed firms [Master’s thesis, Uppsala University]. DiVA. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1782016

LSEG. (2024, October). Environmental, social and governance scores from LSEG. https://www.lseg.com/content/dam/data-analytics/en_us/documents/methodology/lseg-esg-scores-methodology.pdf

Mahmood, Z., Kouser, R., Ali, W., Ahmad, Z., & Salman, T. (2018). Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability, 10(1), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010207

Oyinlola, B. (2025). Do CEO and board characteristics matter in the ESG performance of their firms? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(8), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2024-0052

Qasem, A., AL-Duais, S. D., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., & Thomran, M. (2022). Institutional ownership types and ESG reporting: The case of Saudi listed firms. Sustainability, 14(18), 11316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811316

Sandretto, D., Rizzi, A., & Esposito, G. (2025). Gender diversity leadership and ESG performance: The influence of women on boards and in management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 5075–5094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4241

Stock Exchange of Thailand. (n.d.). Sustainability disclosure & reporting. Retrieved November 1, 2025, from https://setsustainability.com/page/disclosure

Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00120-6

Treepongkaruna, S., Starita, S., & Chan, K. F. (2026). Family control and ownership, corporate culture, and ESG performance in Thailand. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70774

Yahya, H. (2025). Female leadership and ESG performance of firms: Nordic evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2023-0129

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Zhang, C., Farooq, U., Jamali, D., & Alam, M. M. (2024). The role of ESG performance in the nexus between economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102358