Evolvement of Action Value Accounting (AVA)

Main Article Content

Yanyong Thammatucharee

บทคัดย่อ

       The current double-entry accounting concept (CDAC) has been used for over 500 years. Apparently, the technology disruption, and business transformation have challenged its relevance and usefulness. There are certain limitations and flaws in CDAC that hinder the progress of dynamic business model development. With the upcoming emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, many of the current jobs may be replaced causing humans to find proper solution to balance both machines and human to stay together without high conflicts. The value of an action performed by humans can become more meaningful and eventually can be traded. The volatility and rapidly changing business environment have pointed to the need for new effective and meaningful performance measurement for better decision making and business forecast. This paper proposed a new concept of value creation through driving the selected actions as generated by a tool called “action grid”, and the action value accounting (AVA) as a supporting if not a replacement tool for the CDAC. There are still several existing limitations that require further empirical study, but it opens opportunity for future research.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิชาการ

References

Barlev, B., & Haddad, J. R. (2016). Tracks Dual Accounting and Enron Control Crisis.

Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0148558X0401900306

Carruthers, B. G., & Espeland, W. N. (1991). Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry

Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality. The American Journal of

Sociology. 97(1), 31-69.

Chiarini, A. (2012). Lean production: Mistakes and limitations of accounting systems inside

the SME sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 23(5), 681-700.

Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J., & Jonsson, M. (2008). Beyond representations: towards an action-centric perspective on tangible interaction. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 1(3-4), 249-267.

Flamholtz, E. G., Bullen, M. L., & Hua W. (2002). Human resource accounting: a historical

perspective and future implications. Management Decision. 40(10), 947-954.

Haynes, B. P. (2007). Office Productivity: A Shift from Cost Reduction to Human

Contribution. Facilities, 25(11), 452-462.

Liucheng, Z. (2019). The application prospect of block chain technology in accounting

industry. 5th International Conference on Finance, Investment, and Law (ICFIL 2019) https://webofproceedings.org

Luo, J. X., Meng, Q. J., & Cai, Y. (2018). Analysis of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence

Application on the Development of Accounting Industry. Open Journal of Business and Management, 6, 850-856. http://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2018.64063

Shields, M. D., & Young, S. M. (1992). Effective Long-term Cost Reduction: A Strategic

Perspective. Long-term Cost Reduction, Spring 1992, 16-30.

Surana, G., & Bhanawat, S. S. (2020). Block Chain Technology Based Futuristic Accounting:

An Opinion Survey. Alochana Chakra Journal. 9(5), 6314-6321.

Thammatucharee, Y. (2009). The Effective Controller in the 21st Century. Charleston, U.S.A.:

Createspace.

Thammatucharee, Y. (2010). Exdysivity – An Introduction to a New Management Concept.

Charleston, U.S.A: Createspace.

Thammatucharee, Y. (2021). Action Value: An Introduction to action accounting. Review of

Integrative Business and Economic Research, 10, 62-73.