Evolvement of Action Value Accounting (AVA)
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The current double-entry accounting concept (CDAC) has been used for over 500 years. Apparently, the technology disruption, and business transformation have challenged its relevance and usefulness. There are certain limitations and flaws in CDAC that hinder the progress of dynamic business model development. With the upcoming emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, many of the current jobs may be replaced causing humans to find proper solution to balance both machines and human to stay together without high conflicts. The value of an action performed by humans can become more meaningful and eventually can be traded. The volatility and rapidly changing business environment have pointed to the need for new effective and meaningful performance measurement for better decision making and business forecast. This paper proposed a new concept of value creation through driving the selected actions as generated by a tool called “action grid”, and the action value accounting (AVA) as a supporting if not a replacement tool for the CDAC. There are still several existing limitations that require further empirical study, but it opens opportunity for future research.
Article Details
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสารไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำข้อมูลทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ก่อนเท่านั้น
References
Barlev, B., & Haddad, J. R. (2016). Tracks Dual Accounting and Enron Control Crisis.
Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0148558X0401900306
Carruthers, B. G., & Espeland, W. N. (1991). Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry
Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality. The American Journal of
Sociology. 97(1), 31-69.
Chiarini, A. (2012). Lean production: Mistakes and limitations of accounting systems inside
the SME sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 23(5), 681-700.
Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J., & Jonsson, M. (2008). Beyond representations: towards an action-centric perspective on tangible interaction. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 1(3-4), 249-267.
Flamholtz, E. G., Bullen, M. L., & Hua W. (2002). Human resource accounting: a historical
perspective and future implications. Management Decision. 40(10), 947-954.
Haynes, B. P. (2007). Office Productivity: A Shift from Cost Reduction to Human
Contribution. Facilities, 25(11), 452-462.
Liucheng, Z. (2019). The application prospect of block chain technology in accounting
industry. 5th International Conference on Finance, Investment, and Law (ICFIL 2019) https://webofproceedings.org
Luo, J. X., Meng, Q. J., & Cai, Y. (2018). Analysis of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence
Application on the Development of Accounting Industry. Open Journal of Business and Management, 6, 850-856. http://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2018.64063
Shields, M. D., & Young, S. M. (1992). Effective Long-term Cost Reduction: A Strategic
Perspective. Long-term Cost Reduction, Spring 1992, 16-30.
Surana, G., & Bhanawat, S. S. (2020). Block Chain Technology Based Futuristic Accounting:
An Opinion Survey. Alochana Chakra Journal. 9(5), 6314-6321.
Thammatucharee, Y. (2009). The Effective Controller in the 21st Century. Charleston, U.S.A.:
Createspace.
Thammatucharee, Y. (2010). Exdysivity – An Introduction to a New Management Concept.
Charleston, U.S.A: Createspace.
Thammatucharee, Y. (2021). Action Value: An Introduction to action accounting. Review of
Integrative Business and Economic Research, 10, 62-73.