เมจิกฟอร์มูล่ากับการลงทุนแบบเน้นคุณค่าในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research is to test whether the Magic Formula Strategy can make an abnormal return and when simultaneously including qualitative data as factors will make greater abnormal return than considering only Magic Formula Strategy for Value Investing that makes profit from mispricing. In this research will separate in 2 strategies (1) Considering only Magic Formula strategy (2) Considering both Magic Formula Strategy and monthly SET market reports that represent for qualitative data. Each strategies comprise of 10, 20, 30 and 40 securities in portfolios totaling 8 portfolios. And the sample securities of this study are listed on SET during 2009 to 2018.
From the study in 10-years period since 2009 to 2018 finds that investing by considering both Magic Formula Strategy and monthly SET market reports in 20 securities and when calculated by the Magic Formula Strategy Basis ,the Magic Formula is not greater than 30 will give the highest return and return per risk (Sharpe Ratio). Additionally, there is an empirical evidence that considering both qualitative data and Magic Formula Strategy give greater returns than considering only Magic Formula Strategy, that is only a quantitative data. And, every portfolio’s return per risk (Sharpe Ratio) is greater than SET.
Article Details
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสารไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำข้อมูลทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากวารสารสภาวิชาชีพบัญชี ก่อนเท่านั้น
References
ภาษาไทย
อุรสา บรรณกิจโศภน. (2553). ปัจจัยที่มีผลต่อการตัดสินใจลงทุนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย ; Factors affecting investment decision making in the stock exchange of Thailand (วิทยานิพนธ์). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์.
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341-372.
Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307-343.
Ball, Ray., & Brown, Plilip. (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accouting Research, Autumn (1968), 159-177.
Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682.
Bird, R., & Casavecchia, L. (2007). Sentiment and financial health indicators for value and growth stocks: The European experience. The European Journal of Finance, 13(8), 769-793.
Borges, M. R. (2010). Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, 16(7), 711-726.
Brown, S., & Warner, J. (1985). Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.
Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1985), 3-31.
Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. (2013). A guide to the Magic Formula investment strategy. Retrieved from https://catalystmf.com/spotlights/investors-choice-awards-nominates-two-catalyst-funds/.
Chan, L. K., & Lakonishok, J. (2004). Value and growth investing: Review and update. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(1), 71-86.
Choi, B. P., & Mukherji, S. (2010). Optimal portfolios for different holding periods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 8(10).
Dhatt, M.S., Kim, Y.H. & Mukherji, S. (1999). The Value Premium for Small-Capitalization Stocks, Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5)5, 60-68.
Dhatt, M. S., Kim, Y. H., & Mukherji, S. (2004). Can composite value measures enhance portfolio performance? The Journal of Investing, 13(4), 42-48.
Elisa, H., Jelena, P., & Rickard, P. (2013). Value relevance of accounting information and its impact on stock prices: Evidence from Sweden. Department of Economics, Stockholm University. Sweden.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
Graham, Benjamin. (1949). The Intelligent Investor. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Greenblatt, J. (2006). The little book that beats the market. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Greenblatt, J. (2010). The little book that still beats the market. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Greenblatt, J. (1997). You Can Be a Stock Market Genius. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 661-687.
Olin, Tomi. (2011). Value investing in the Finnish stock market (Master’s thesis). Alto University, Espooo, Finland.
Peeratiyuth, Koedkao. (2020). Update: Magic Formula สูตรการลงทุนอันแสนมหัศจรรย์ของ Joel Greenblatt, Retrieved from https://www.siamquant.com/magic-formula-update-2020/.
Philip, V. & Tim du Toit. (2014). Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What works for achieving alpha. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-Value-Investing-Europe-achieving-ebook/dp/B00M8B01EE.
Piotroski, J. D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 1-41.
Postma, P.P.M. (2015). Magic Formula investing in the Benelux (Bachelor thesis). Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Rousseau, R., & Rensburg, P. V. (2003). Time and the payoff to value investing. Journal of Asset Management, 4(5), 318-325.
Valencia, H., Lorenzo, V., & Duran, V., (2007). Value Relevance of the Ohlson model with Mexican data. Contaduría y Administración, septiembre-diciembre, 223, 33-52.
Sareewiwatthana, P. (2013). Common financial ratios and value investing in Thailand. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 2(3), 69-85.
Sareewiwatthana, P. (2015). Value investment in Thailand: Optimal number of stocks and holding period. NIDA Business Journal, 16(2), 5-25.