THE STUDY OF LEARNING OUTCOME USING INTERACTIVE APPROACH THROUGH TRACKER VIDEO ANALYSIS T
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research is to study the effects of using interactive approach through tracker video analysis on kinematic graph concepts of 46 grade 10 students of The Prince Royal's College, Chiang Mai Province. It was held on the first semester of academic year 2017. The research instruments were 1) 5 pre-designed learning modules based on interactive approach through tracker video analysis. Teaching lasted for of 18 hours / 6 weeks. 2) kinematic graph concepts (KR-20 = 0.86) The results revealed that class average normalized gain 0.52 which represent a better understanding in medium gain level.
Article Details
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2551). หลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Association of Physics Teacher, 62, 750.
Bektasli, B. (2006). The relationships between spatial ability, logical thinking, mathematics performance and kinematics graph interpretation skills of 12th grade physics students. Dissertation of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in The Graduate School of Ohio State University.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington DC.1 FGK28050, George Washington Univ., Washington DC.
Calik, M., Ayas, A., & Col, R. K. (2010). Investigating the Effectiveness of Teaching Methods Based on a Four-Step Constructivist Strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 32–48.
Gregorcic, B., & Bodin, M. (2017). Algodoo: A Tool for Encouraging Creativity in Physics Teaching and Learning. The Physics Teacher, 55(1), 25-28.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Hançer A. H., & Durkan, N. (2008). Turkish Pupils Understanding of Physical Concept: Force and Movement. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(1), 45 – 50.
Hassan, M., & Hamada, M., (2016). Recommending Learning Peers for Collaborative Learning through Social Network Sites. Proceeding presented in 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (ISMS).
Jairuk., A. (2007). The Use of Interactive Lecture Demonstrations in Force and Motion to Teach high school-level Physics. Dissertation of The Degree of Master of Science and Technology Education Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University.
Miller, L. M., Moreno, J., Willcockson, I., Smith, D., & Mayes, J. (2006). An online, interactive approach to teaching neuroscience to adolescents. CBE Life Science Education, 5(2), 137–143.
Prescott, A., & Mitchelmore, M. (2005). Student misconceptions about projectile motion. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, A. Roche, M. Horne, & D. Gronn (Eds.), MERGA 28 Building Connections: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 633-640). Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Rodrigues, M., & Simeão Carvalho, P. (2013). Teaching physics with Angry Birds: exploring the kinematics and dynamics of the game. Physics Education, 48(4), 431–437.
Rudolph A. L., Lamine, B., Joyce, M., Vignolles, H. & Consiglio, D. (2014). Introduction of interactive learning into French university physics classrooms. PHYS. REV. ST PHYS. EDUC. RES., 10, 010103.
SirisathitkulI, C., GlawtanongI, P., EadkongI, T., & Sirisathitkul, Y. (2013). Digital video analysis of falling objects in air and liquid using Tracker, Rev. Bras. Ensino Fís., 35(1), 1504-6.
Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher, 35(6), 340-347.
Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (2004). Interactive Lecture Demonstrations: Active Learning in Introductory Physics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Taber, K. S. (2000). Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 399 -417.
Watts, M., & Pope, M. (1998). Thinking about thinking, learning about learning: constructivism in physics education. Physics Education, 24(6), 326-331.
