Psychometric Evaluation of the Emotion Regulation Instrument for Teacher Education Institution Students Utilizing AI in Scientific Writing

Main Article Content

Rizki Mustikasari
Ratri Harida
Cutiana Windri Astuti

Abstract

This study examined the validity and reliability of an emotion regulation measurement instrument for university students using artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific writing, involving a sample of 100 respondents. Data were analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) within the Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM) framework, implemented using AMOS with Maximum Likelihood estimation. The adapted instrument consists of 18 items across two dimensions: Cognitive Reappraisal (Items 1–13) and Expressive Suppression (Items 14–18), expanded contextually from the original 10-item Gross & John’s ERQ. The measurement model demonstrated good overall fit (equation/df = 1.31; RMSEA = 0.056; CFI = 0.955; TLI = 0.949; IFI = 0.956). All 18 indicators loaded significantly (p < 0.001) with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.57 to 0.76, confirming convergent validity. Construct Reliability (CR) was also computed and found to meet the acceptable threshold (CR ≥ 0.70). Overall, the instrument demonstrates adequate psychometric properties and provides a sound basis for assessing emotion regulation in the context of AI-assisted scientific writing.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004

Andrés, M. L., Stelzer, F., Juric, L. C., Introzzi, I., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., & Guzmán, J. I. N. (2017). Emotion regulation and academic performance: A systematic review of empirical relationships. Psicologia em Estudo, 22(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v22i3.34360

Aryansah, J. E., & Sari, S. P. (2021). Analisis peran regulasi emosi mahasiswa terhadap kebijakan school from home di masa pandemi Covid-19 [Analysis of the role of student emotion regulation toward the school-from-home policy during the Covid-19 pandemic]. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 6(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v6i1.1312

Balabdaoui, F., Dittmann-Domenichini, N., Grosse, H., Schlienger, C., & Kortemeyer, G. (2024). A survey on students’ use of AI at a technical university. Discover Education, 3 Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00136-4

Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116

Chubb, J., Cowling, P., & Reed, D. (2022). Speeding up to keep up: Exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & Society, 37(4), 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01259-0

Costa, K., Ntsobi, P. M., & Mfolo, L. (2024). Challenges, benefits and recommendations for using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing: A case of ChatGPT. Medicon Engineering Themes, 7(4), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.55162/MCET.07.236

Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University students’ use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.17379

Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS). Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000093

Goodwin, C. J. (1995). Research in psychology: Methods and design (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271

Gross, J. J. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x

Kaewta, R., Witchayawat, W., Seehamat, L., & Sapphasuk, W. (2025). An analysis of factors and indicators of research competencies of basic education teachers. Journal of Educational Measurement, Mahasarakham University, 31(2), 22–38.

Kumala, K. H., & Darmawanti, I. (2022). Strategi regulasi emosi pada mahasiswa dengan banyak peran [Emotion regulation strategies among students with multiple roles]. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(3), 19–29. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/46151?utm_source=chatgpt.com (in Indonesian)

Larantukan, A. M. F., & Yudiarso, A. (2025). Validity of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Measurement Tool Using the Rasch Model in the Indonesian Population. Humanitas, 9(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v9i1.11007

López González, J., Fernández Espinosa, V., & Crespí, P. (2025). Integrating emotional regulation in higher education: An Aristotelian-Thomistic approach. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 36(5), 328-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2025.2457966

Meliala, A. K., & Ahman, A. (2024). Systematic literature review: Validitas konstruk skala psychological well-being Ryff [Systematic literature review: Construct validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being scale]. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(2), 950–955. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i2.995

Messina, I., Spataro, P., Grecucci, A., Moskow, D. M., Marogna, C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2022). Interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Italian version and associations with psychopathology. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 25(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2022.616

Radde, H. A., Nurrahmah, N., Nurhikmah, N., & Saudi, A. N. A. (2021). Uji validitas konstrak dari Emotion Regulation Questionnaire versi bahasa Indonesia dengan menggunakan confirmatory factor analysis [Construct validity test of the Indonesian version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis]. Jurnal Psikologi Karakter, 1(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.56326/jpk.v1i2.1284

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian [Quantitative analysis of research instruments]. Parama Publishing.

Sheppes, G., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739

Weiss, N. H., Kiefer, R., Goncharenko, S., Raudales, A. M., Forkus, S. R., Schick, M. R., & Contractor, A. A. (2022). Emotion regulation and substance use: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 230, Article 109131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109131

Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903174853