A Multiple Intelligences–Based Administrative Model for Promoting Vocational Skills among Primary School Students

Main Article Content

Sunya Srisuk

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) examine the context, problems, and needs related to learning management; (2) develop multiple intelligences–based administrative model integrating learning management to promote students’ vocational skills; and (3) implement and evaluate the developed model. A mixed methods approach was employed under a research and development (R&D) framework consisting of four phases: contextual analysis, model development and validation, implementation, and evaluation and refinement. The participants included 30 Grade 6 students, 10 teachers, and one school administrator. Research instruments comprised interviews, questionnaires, model evaluation forms, and achievement tests. Data were analyzed using content analysis, descriptive statistics, and t-tests. The findings indicated that the school possessed strong local resources and community support but lacked an instructional management model aligned with students’ multiple intelligences. The developed administrative model consisted of five components—background, principles, objectives, core components, and a six-step operational process. Following implementation, students’ learning achievement significantly improved at the .01 level, and their satisfaction was rated high. Teachers and administrators also perceived the model as feasible and practical, highlighting its potential for systematic and sustainable application in rural schools.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed.). ASCD.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). Longman.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). SAGE.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the CIPP model to assess long-term enterprises. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912

Office of the Education Council. (2017). The national education plan B.E. 2560–2579 (2017–2036). Ministry of Education, Thailand. (in Thai)

Poonsuk, W. (2021). Development of integrated learning activities based on multiple intelligences to enhance career skills in primary education. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 15(2), 145–160. (in Thai)

Ruangprapan, C. (2000). Basic statistics for behavioral and social sciences research. Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)