The Development of Learning Design Competency for Academic Support Staff of King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi through Feedback Processes in Experiential Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to develop experiential learning activities integrated with feedback to enhance the learning design competency of academic support staff at King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, and to investigate the competency development of those who participated in the program. The sample consisted of 31 academic support staff selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments included activity worksheets and behavioral checklist forms. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and effect size. The developed learning activities comprised three components: (1) self-directed learning of core concepts, (2) practice-based learning, and (3) real-world problem-based scenarios. The implementation significantly enhanced participants’ learning design competency (p < .001). Repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference in competency scores across three time points, F(1.483, 44.487) = 898.729, p < .001. Competency scores increased in each successive assessment.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information contained in the published article in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University represent the opinions and responsibilities of the authors directly. The editorial board of the journal is not necessarily in agreement with or responsible for any of the content.
The articles, data, content, images, etc. that have been published in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University are copyrighted by the journal. If any individual or organization wishes to reproduce or perform any actions involving the entirety or any part of the content, they must obtain written permission from the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University.
References
Adelsberger, H. H., Kinshuk, Pawlowski, J. M., & Sampson, D. G. (2008). Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Springer.
Asregid, D., Mihiretie, D. M., & Kassa, S. A. (2023). Teacher educators’ use of feedback to facilitate reflective practice among pre-service teachers during microteaching. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2257121
Bice, M. R., & Sedani, L. A. (2021). The competencies for instructional designers in higher education. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37074/jaid.2021.10.2.3
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. McGraw Hill.
Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New trends in formative-summative evaluations for adult education. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer.
Carless, D., & Young, S. (2024). Feedback seeking and student reflective feedback literacy: A sociocultural discourse analysis. Higher Education, 88, 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01146-1
Dawson, P., Carless, D., & Lee, P. P. W. (2020). Authentic feedback: Supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. HarperCollins College.
Fuentes-Cimma, J., Sluijsmans, D., Riquelme, A., Jahouh, M., & Schuwirth, L. (2024). Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05439-6
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hu, B. Y., Guan, L., Li, Y., Roberts, S. K., & Zhang, X. (2021). Feedback matters: Examining the use of feedback strategies by Chinese preschool teachers in science lessons. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(8), 1355–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01265-3
Karaman, P. (2021). The effect of formative assessment practices on student learning: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(4), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.870300
Knowles, M. S. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Elsevier.
Lipnevich, A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195
Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us [Report No. 14]. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
McKimm, J., & Barrow, M. (2009). Curriculum and course design. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 70(12), 714–717. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2009.70.12.45510
Molloy, E. K., & Boud, D. (2014). Feedback models for learning, teaching and performance. In J. M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 413–424). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_33
Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637482
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
Narciss, D. (2013). Designing and Evaluating Tutoring Feedback Strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the Interactive Tutoring Feedback Model. Digital Education Review, 23(1), 7-23
O’Donovan, B. (2017). How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedback. Higher Education, 74(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0068-y
Rao, N. J. (2020). Outcome-based education: An outline. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886418
Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Martin, F. (2021). The competencies for instructional designers in higher education. Edtech Books.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Sisselman-Borgia, A. G., & Torino, G. C. (2017). Innovations in Experiential Learning for Adult Learners. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 7, 3-13.
Spady, W. G. (1988). Organizing for Results-The Basis of Authentic Restructuring and Reform. Educational Leadership, 42(2), 4-8.
Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2009). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tantiphlachiva, K., Iramaneerat, C., & Lertbunnaphong, T. (2023). Improving surgical skills with feedback: Directly-observed versus video-recorded practice. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 660. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04635-0
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0302_5
Voinea, L. (2018). Formative assessment as assessment for learning development. Revista de Pedagogie - Journal of Pedagogy, LXVI(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2018.1/7
Whitney, D. R., & Sabers, D. L. (1970). Improving essay examinations III: Use of item analysis, Technical Bulletin II [Mimeographed]. University Evaluation and Examination Service.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2019). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087