The Results of Using the Reading Literacy Promotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) compare reading literacy before and after using the Reading Literacy Promotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA); 2) assess the use of the Reading Literacy Promotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). The sample consisted of 35 grade 8 students, obtained by cluster random sampling. The instruments were the Reading Literacy Promotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), a test, and an assessment form for the program. The analysis of data employed the mean, standard deviation, and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was employed in the hypothesis testing. The results were as follows:
1. The comparison of reading literacy before and after using the Reading LiteracyPromotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) revealed that the reading literacy score after using the program was higher than before using the program, with statistical significance at the .01 level.
2. The results of the assessment of the use of the Reading Literacy Promotion Program According to the Guidelines of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), using the CIPPIEST model, revealed that: the result of the context assessment of the students as a whole was at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level; the result of the input assessment of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level; the result of the process assessment of the students as a whole was at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a moderate level; the results of the product assessment and the impact assessment of the students as a whole were at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level; the result of the product assessment (effectiveness assessment) of the students as a whole was at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level; the result of the sustainability assessment of the students as a whole was at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level; in terms of transferring (transportability), the result of the overall assessment was at a high level and that of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information contained in the published article in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University represent the opinions and responsibilities of the authors directly. The editorial board of the journal is not necessarily in agreement with or responsible for any of the content.
The articles, data, content, images, etc. that have been published in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University are copyrighted by the journal. If any individual or organization wishes to reproduce or perform any actions involving the entirety or any part of the content, they must obtain written permission from the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University.
References
Gurria, A. (2009). The Organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD) Annual Report. OECD Press.
Gurria, A. (2015). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. OECD Press.
Gurria, A. (2012). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Press.
Coulombe, S., J.F. Trembly and S. Marshall. (2004). Literacy7 score, Human Capital, and Growth across Fourteen OECD Countries. OECD Press.
Chandai, S. (2016). The development of teaching-learning models according to the teaching of reading experiences, supplementing learning and self-directed learning to promote reading literacy among students at grade level Lower Secondary School [Doctoral Thesis]. Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Korkaew, N. (2020). Developing a set of exercises to enhance reading literacy skills according to the assessment guidelines of PISA, Thai language learning subject group for grade 2 students [Master's thesis]. Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
Prayonghom, K. (2015). Developing reading comprehension skills of Mathayom Suksa 1 students by using a narrative structure in combination with collaborative learning management [Master's thesis]. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)
Puengprom, N. (2017). Developing a set of activities for learning English reading comprehension skills based on the concept of the brain Secondary school year 1 [Master's thesis]. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)
Raephet, P. (2016). The development of reading skills exercises from local information in Buriram Province to promote reading comprehension in English [Master's thesis]. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)
Raksuttee, V. (2015). Developing the ability to write a summary of English of Mathayom Suksa 3 students by using critical reading techniques [Master's thesis]. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)
Yaiburi, C. (2015). Developing reading comprehension skills in English by the cooperative learning management method, CIRC technique of Mathayom Suksa 2 students [Master's thesis]. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)