Development of Guidelines for Promotion of Research Ability of Teachers in the Schools for the Deaf in the Northeastern Region
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed: 1) to construct guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability; 2) to compare teachers’ research ability with the 70 percent criterion; and 3) to assess the guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability in the schools for the deaf in the Northeastern Region. This research employed the Research and Development design. The sample was composed of 1) 7 experts for focus group discussion, 2) 10 teachers of the implementation units, and 3) 17 school administrators and teachers. The research instruments consisted of 1) a focus group discussion record form, 2) an assessment form for appropriateness of the guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability, 3) a manual for using the guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability, 4) a short-term research training course, 5) a short-term training plan, 6) a test of research methodology knowledge, 7) an assessment form for research report writing skill, 8) a questionnaire inquiring about ability of conducting attribute research, and 9) an assessment form for the guidelines for promoting research ability. The statistics employed in the analysis of data were basic statistics—percentage, mean, standard deviation; and inferential statistics for testing research hypotheses—t-test for one sample and Wilcoxon signed rank test for one sample. The research findings were as follows:
1. The guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability comprised 2 principles: 1. The principle of management for promotion of teachers’ research ability which consisted of 7 guidelines: (1) establishing a network of cooperation between schools and higher education institutions; (2) applying the 5W2H management principles in planning for research ability development for teachers; (3) creating strategies to motivate teachers to do research; (4) planning projects to promote teachers’ research ability; (5) developing short-term research training courses; (6) building a research team and research mentor system for teachers; (7) providing sources for the Internet access within the school; (8) setting the online research clinic for teachers seeking advice; and (9) having experts to impart knowledge to teachers. 2. The principle of teachers’ research ability development which consisted of 4 guidelines: (1) organizing workshops focusing on hands-on experience; (2) using the process of professional learning community to drive the teachers’ research outputs; (3) providing advice on research by experts; and (4) supervising, monitoring and assessing teacher research works by the school internal supervision system.
2. The comparison of teachers’ research ability with the 70 percent criterion revealed that the teachers’ research ability regarding knowledge, skills, and attributes were higher than the criterion, with statistical significance at the 0.05 level.
3. The results of the assessment of the guidelines for promotion of teachers’ research ability in the schools for the deaf in Northeastern Region, on the whole, were found to have appropriateness in the highest level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information contained in the published article in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University represent the opinions and responsibilities of the authors directly. The editorial board of the journal is not necessarily in agreement with or responsible for any of the content.
The articles, data, content, images, etc. that have been published in the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University are copyrighted by the journal. If any individual or organization wishes to reproduce or perform any actions involving the entirety or any part of the content, they must obtain written permission from the Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University.
References
Anderson, J., el al. (1994). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of management review, 19(3), 472-509.
Ben, M. (1985). Supervisory behavior in Education. Prentice Hall.
Career Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited. (2011). Researcher development framework. https://vitae.ac.uk/rdfconditionsofuse
Daly, A. (2010). Social network Theory and Educational Change. Harvard education press.
Drennan, R. (2018). Research management: a handbook for southern African research management offices. University of East Anglia Press.
Fatima, G., et al. (2016). Instructional practices used by special education teachers in classrooms of young children with deafness. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(1), 89-100.
Karen, S. & Macgregor, C. (2018). Deaf education teacher preparation: A phenomenological case study of a graduate program with a comprehensive philosophy. American Annals of the Deaf, 162(5), 388-418.
Kucuksuleymanoglu, R. (2011). Burnout syndrome levels of teachers in special education schools in turkey. International Journal of Special education, 26(1), 55-63.
Nina, A. et al. (2015). Basic components of developing teachers’ research competence as a condition to improve their competitiveness. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(4), 221-227.
Selvi, K. (2016). Teachers’ competencies. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 7(1), 167-175.
Sindelar, P., Brownell, M., & Billingsley, B. (2010). Special education teacher education research: current status and future directions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 8-24.
Stufflebeam. (1998). Standard for evaluation. https://www.wmich.edu/evalctr
Swan, W., Langford, N., Watson, L., & Varey, R. (2000). Viewing the corporate community as a knowledge network. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 5(2), 97-106.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and Practice. Harcourt Brace & World Press.
The National Deaf Children’s Society. (2004). Deaf friendly teaching. London: The National deaf Children’s Society. https://pisan2012.wordpress.com
Wester, K. & Borders, D. (2014). Research competencies in counseling: A Delphi study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 447-458.
Adulwatthanasiri, M. (2009). Consulting techniques: Implementation. Khonkaen University Press. (in Thai)
Arjinsamajarn, C. (2004). New teaching supervision. Chongcharoen Press. (in Thai)
Boonpen, P. (2018). Research competency and the variables affecting successful research: a case study of national research universities. Kasem Bundit Journal, 19(1), 80-81. (in Thai)
Boon-Aiem, P. (2016). An empowerment model for research in lectures of the institute of physical education [Doctoral dissertation]. Naresuan University. (in Thai)
Buranasing, V. (2014). Short course development. http://curriculumnnfe1.blogspot.com
Buasai, S. (2014). Area base collaborative research. Area Base Development Research Journal, 6(3), 123-128. (in Thai)
Buapli, C. (2016). 5W2H analysis. http://59130545v1.blogspot.com (in Thai)
Department of Mental Health. (2003). Basic counseling guide. Ministry of public health Press. (in Thai)
Jamornmann, U. (1990). Project assessment guide. Funny Publishing Press. (in Thai)
Kaiwan, Y. (2016). Research and development of training courses. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Latoontheerakul, N. (2017). PLC Professional learning community and teacher development for students in Thailand 4.0. http://Users/Admin/Desktop/PLC (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2010). Research report on network development and evaluation of educational management. Plearn studio Press. (in Thai)
Office of the Basis Education Commission. (2016). Consulting. Ministry of Education Press. (in Thai)
Patjan, S. & Ruannakarn, P. (2020). The current states and guideline to enhance teacher’s research ability in School of the Deaf in northeastern region. Journal of Ratchasuda College for Research and Development of Persons with Disabilities, 16(2), 98-111. (in Thai)
Patjan, S., Ruannakarn, P., & Phusee-orn, S. (2019). The current states, strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats of learning and teaching of Roi-Et school for the deaf. Journal of Ratchasuda College for Research and Development of Persons with Disabilities, 15(2), 53-54. (in Thai)
Ritcharoon, P. (2014). Project evaluation techniques. House of Kermist Press. (in Thai)
Ruannakarn, P. (2016). Nonparametric Statistics. Taxila Press. (in Thai)
Ruannakarn, P., Ruannakarn, T., & Pansena, K. (2017). The education quality development and local development by the institute of higher education Mahasarakham university: Case study of kra-bark wittayakham school chuen chom district (Amphoe) Mahasarakham province. Mahasarakham University. (in Thai)
Teachers and Basic Education Personnel Development Bureau. (n.d.). Professional Learning Community. Office of the Basic Education Commission Press. (in Thai)
Tong-art, T. (n.d.). Research Management. https://www.gotoknow.org/posts (in Thai)
Walaisathien, P., Opun, S., Wiset, S., Benchathap, C., & Hasannari, C. (2003). Developer’s work processes and techniques. The Thailand Research Fund Press. (in Thai)
Wongwanich, S. & Wiratchai, N. (2003). Thesis consultation guidelines. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Yamtim, V. (2017). Guidelines of teacher research capacity building in science teacher network professional community. Journal of Education and Human Development Sciences, 1(1), 66-67. (in Thai)