Self-evaluation Bias

Main Article Content

Chutaphon Masantiah

Abstract

Self-evaluation bias is the direction of judgement error toward a learner's ability. Learner's self-evaluation bias can be measured with several forms of tools, and learner's self-evaluation can possibly come from different elements. In order to benefit teachers, university teaching staff and researchers in their application of the body of knowledge of self-evaluation bias in student development as well as in research and educational evaluation, this article aims to present the content on the following topics:1) definition and significance of self-evaluation bias; 2) guidelines for self-evaluation bias analysis; and 3) elements influencing self-evaluation bias.

Article Details

Section
Academic Article

References

Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 207-216.

Alaoutinen, S. (2012). Evaluating the effect of learning style and student background on self-assessment accuracy. Computer Science Education, 22(2), 175-198.

Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2001). A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(2), 133-151.

Chen, C. S. (2002). Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 20(1), 11-25.

Chung, H. Q., Chen, V., & Olson, C. B. (2021). The impact of self‑assessment, planning and goal setting, and refection before and after revision on student self‑efficacy and writing performance. Reading and Writing, 34, 1885-1913.

Eberlein, M., Ludwig, S., & Nafziger, J. (2010). The effects of feedback on self-assessment. Bulletin of Economic Research, 63(2), 177-199.

Eva, K W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10), 46-54.

Hale, C. C. (2015). Self-assessment as academic community building: a study from a Japanese liberal arts university. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1), 1-12.

Ip, W. Y., Lui, M. L., Chien, W. T., Lee, I. F., Lam, L. W., & Lee, D. T. (2014). Promoting self-reflection in clinical practice among Chinese nursing undergraduates in Hong Kong. Contemp Nurse, 41(2), 253-262.

Jeong, H., Lee, J., Kim, J., Choen, S., Sohn, K. M., Kim, Y. S., & Kiem, S. (2020). Self-Assessment Questionnaire for Efficient and Safe Evaluation of Patients with Mild COVID-19. Infection & chemotherapy, 52(2), 212–215.

Kelberlau-Berks, D. R. (2006). The effects of self-assessment on student learning. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=mathmidactionresearch

Klassen, R. (2006). Too much confidence? The self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents with learning disabilities. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 181-200). Information Age.

Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students' self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition Learning, 5, 173-194.

Madrazo, L., Lee, C. B., McConnell, M., & Khamisa, K. (2018). Self-assessment differences between genders in a low-stakes objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 1-4.

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49.

Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139.

Pallier, G. (2003). Gender Differences in the Self-Assessment of Accuracy on Cognitive Tasks. Sex Roles, 48(5), 265–276

Peyghambarian, F., Fatemi, M. A., & Ashraf, H. (2015). On the Effect of Online Formative Assessment on Iranian Lower Intermediate EFL Learners Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature, 4(2), 189-192.

Ramdass, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 18-41.

Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Retrieval-Monitoring-Feedback (RMF) Technique for Producing Efficient and Durable Student Learning. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, 28, 67-78.

Scherpereel, C. M., & Bowers, M. Y. (2008). Back to the future: gender differences in self-ratings of team performance criteria. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 35, 170-179.

Schraw, G., Potenza, M. T., & Nebelsick-Gullet, L. (1993). Constraints on the calibration of performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 455-463.

Sharma, R., Jain, A., Gupta, N., Garg, S., Batta, M., & Dhir, S. K. (2016). Impact of self-assessment by students on their learning. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research,6(3), 226-229.

Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). Calibration of self-evaluations of mathematical ability for students in England aged 13 and 15, and their intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics after age 16. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 49-61.

Wray, E. (2013). RISE Model. http://www.emilywray.com/rise-model

Yilmaz, F. N. (2017). Reliability of Scores Obtained from Self-, Peer-, and Teacher-Assessments on Teaching Materials Prepared by Teacher Candidates. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2), 395–409.

Ziegler, B., & Montplaisir, L. (2014). Student Perceived and Determined Knowledge of Biology Concepts in an Upper-Level Biology Course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 322-330.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Routledge.

Ziv, A. K., Lehrer, K., & Schmid, H. B. (2011). Self-evaluation: Affective and social grounds of intentionality. Springer.