Phenomenon – Based Learning Management through the Creation of Short Cartoon on the Topic "Buddha dhamma and Life in the Digital Age" to Promote Analytical Thinking for Matthayomsuksa 1 Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to study (1) the current conditions and problems of learning management aimed at enhancing analytical thinking skills of Matthayomsuksa 1 students in Social Studies, Religion, and Culture (Buddhist Studies strand), and (2) to develop phenomenon-based learning through the process of creating short cartoons entitled “Buddha dhamma and Life in the Digital Age” to promote analytical thinking skills. The research is a qualitative study employing an action research design. The sample in the first phase consisted of 329 Matthayomsuksa 1 students in Mueang Phitsanulok District. The target group in the second phase was one Matthayomsuksa 1 classroom at Naresuan University Demonstration School. They were selected by purposive sampling. The instrument for collecting data was lesson plans, questionnaires, in-depth interviews, field notes, and analytical thinking assessment forms. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Content Analysis. The research results were found as follows;
1) The current learning management practices mainly emphasized knowledge transmission and memorization, which resulted in students’ limited analytical thinking skills and their inability to effectively connect Buddhist principles with daily life. 2) Phenomenon-based learning through the short cartoon creation process significantly increased students’ learning interest, encouraged active participation, and clearly enhanced their analytical thinking skills. Students were able to analyze problems, interpret phenomena in the digital era, and appropriately apply Buddhist principles to their daily lives.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2562). แนวทางการจัดการเรียนรู้เชิงรุก (Active Learning). กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.
โกวิท วงศ์สุรวัฒน์. (2562). พุทธธรรมกับชีวิตสมัยใหม่. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2564). ศาสตร์การสอน: องค์ความรู้เพื่อการจัดกระบวนการเรียนรู้ที่มีประสิทธิภาพ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ.ปยุตฺโต). (2563). พุทธธรรม: ฉบับปรับขยาย. กรุงเทพฯ: มหามกุฏราชวิทยาลัย.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2564). รายงานการวิเคราะห์กรอบทักษะแห่งอนาคตสำหรับการศึกษาไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
สุรชัย พิทักษ์ธรรม. (2563). การจัดการเรียนรู้พระพุทธศาสนาในศตวรรษที่ 21. วารสารการศึกษาไทย, 17(2): 45-62.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1): 21–32.
Cary, S. (2004). Going graphic: Comics at work in the multilingual classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, W. (2008). Comics and sequential art: Principles and practices from the legendary cartoonist. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. California: Insight Assessment.
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2): 99–107.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications.
Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Helsinki: Edita.
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: HarperCollins.
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (8th ed.). Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
Silander, P. (2015). Phenomenon-based learning in Finnish education. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenography. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(6): 31–48.
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yang, G. L. (2008). Graphic novels in the classroom. Language Arts, 85(3): 185–192.
