A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM LEARNING MANAGEMENT ON FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY IN THE TOPIC OF QUADRILATERALS

Authors

  • Dananat Nakarit Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University
  • Songchai Ugsonkid Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University
  • Tongta Somchaipeng Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/edubuu.2026.11

Keywords:

Flipped classroom instruction, Mathematical reasoning ability

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of flipped classroom learning on the topic of quadrilaterals on the mathematical reasoning ability of fifth-grade students. The target group of this study was fifth-grade students from a school in Bangkok, consisting of two classrooms, totaling 79 students. The sample was selected using purposive sampling, mixed-ability groups. The research instruments used in this study were as follows: 1) eight flipped-classroom-based lesson plans on the topic of quadrilaterals, and 2) three sets of subjective tests designed to measure students’ mathematical reasoning ability on the topic of quadrilaterals. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics including percentage, mean and standard deviation, as well as qualitative analysis of students’ written responses. The findings revealed that for reasoning through argumentation and justification, the overall average score of students in both classrooms was 78.79 out of 100 with a standard deviation of 22.23. For reasoning in problem-solving, the combined average score for both classrooms were 82.91 out of 100 with a standard deviation of 16.13. In addition, qualitative analysis of students’ responses indicated that most students were able to explain their reasoning more clearly, with accurate and systematic connections between their prior knowledge and the properties of quadrilaterals. Students could use mathematical language more effectively and present their thought processes in greater detail. Classroom discussions fostered more diverse exchanges of ideas and reasoning. Furthermore, students showed increased confidence in expressing their opinions, improved analytical thinking, and enhanced mathematical communication skills.

References

กมลทิพย์ เกตุศรี. (2564). การศึกษาความสามารถในการแก้ปัญหาและการให้เหตุผลทางคณิตศาสตร์ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 เรื่องพื้นที่ผิวและปริมาตร โดยการสอนแนะให้รู้คิด (CGI) ร่วมกับการนึกภาพ (Visualization) กับการสอนแบบปกติ [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต, มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ].

วิชัย เสวกงาม. (2557). การคิดวิเคราะห์และการคิดอย่างมีวิจารณญาณ. สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2555). การจัดการเรียนรู้เพื่อศตวรรษที่ 21. มูลนิธิสดศรี-สฤษดิ์วงศ์.

สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2547). การจัดการเรียนรู้กลุ่มวิทยาศาสตร์หลักสูตรการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี.

อัมพร ม้าคนอง. (2553). ทักษะและกระบวนการทางคณิตศาสตร์: การพัฒนาเพื่อพัฒนาการ. โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1–18.

Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Cherrez, N. J., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education: Trends, gaps, and future directions. European Journal of Engineering Education. Advance online publication.

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622.

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning.

Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 193–233.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Nakarit, D., Ugsonkid, S., & Somchaipeng, T. (2026). A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM LEARNING MANAGEMENT ON FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY IN THE TOPIC OF QUADRILATERALS. Journal of Education Burapha University, 37(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14456/edubuu.2026.11