Myanmar as a Pariah state labelled by the West: the era before political transition in 2010

Main Article Content

อภิรดี จิโรภาส

Abstract

The World underwent substantial changes in the political arena during the Cold War era. Democratization spread across western countries as a result of their belief that their states would become stronger under a democratic regime. These western countries next began to refer to any state, which did not apply the same regime, as a weak state. In the democratic world, the United States of America began to act a big brother to other nations. The US has since created many other terms to use in place of the term weak state, such as a rogue state and an axis of evil. The purpose of this article is to explain why Myanmar is claimed to be a pariah state from a western perspective before its political transition in 2010. There were many problems that can be seen to have arisen from the lack of human rights in that country, and from its apparent lack of a rule of law. The way the country is ruled under a military regime is also another reason to term it as a pariah, as the junta often uses violence against its own civilians. All of these factors have helped to shape the current negative attitudes of the West towards the Myanmarese state.

Article Details

How to Cite
จิโรภาส อ. (2023). Myanmar as a Pariah state labelled by the West: the era before political transition in 2010 . INTHANIN THAKSIN JOURNAL THAKSIN UNIVERSITY, 18(2), 85–98. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSOTSU/article/view/265178
Section
บทความวิชาการ

References

Alamgir, Jalal. (1997). Against the current: The survival of Authoritarianism in Burma, Pacific Affairs, 70(3), 333-350.

Callahan, Mary, P. (2003). Making Enemies: War and State Building in Burma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Duffield, Mark. (2008). On the Edge of ‘No Man’s Land: An Independent Report Commissioned by the Office of the UN, RC/HC, Yangon and UNOCHA, New York.

Englehart, Neil, A. (2012). Two Cheers for Burma's Rigged Election, Asian Survey, 52(4), 666-686.

Ghai, Yash. (2008). The 2008 Myanmar Constitution: Analysis and Assessment. Retrieved on January 21, 2023 from http://www. burmalibrary. org/docs6/2008_Myanmar_constitution--analysis_and_assessment-Yash_ Ghai.pdf.

Guyot, James, F. (1991). Myanmar in 1990: The Unconsummated Election, Asian Survey, 31(2), 205-211.

Harkavy, Robert, E. (1981). Pariah States and Nuclear Proliferation, International Organization, 35(1), 135-163.

Hlaing, Kyaw, Y. (2004). Myanmar in 2003: Frustration and Despair?, Asian Survey, 44(1), 87-92.

International Crisis Group. (2001). Myanmar: the Role of Civil Society, Asia Report, No.27, Bangkok/Brussels.

International Crisis Group. (2002). Myanmar: The Future of the Armed Forces, Asia Briefing, Bangkok/Brussels.

International Crisis group. (2008). Burma/Myanmar: After the Crackdown, Asia Report, No.144.

Lehman, F, K. (1981). Military Rule in Burma Since 1962. Singapore: Maruzen Asia Pte.Ltd.

Liddel, Zunetta. (1999). No Room to Move: Legal Constraints on Civil Society in Burma. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books Publishing Company.

Matthews, Bruce. (1998). The Present Fortune of tradition-Bound Authoritarianism in Myanmar, Pacific Affairs, 71(1), 7-23.

Maung, Mya. (1997). Burma’s Economic Performance under Military Rule: An Assessment, Asain Survey, 37(6), 503-524.

McCarthy, Stephen. (2000). Ten Years of Chaos in Burma: Foreign Investment and Economic Liberalization under the SLORC-SPDC,1988 to 1998, Pacific Affairs, 73(2), 233-262.

Saijun, Kosum. (2006). Burma: the Foreign Policy. Chiang Mai: Chotanaprint Publishing Company (Thai book).

Selth, Andrew. (2002). Burma’s Armed Forces: Power Without Glory. The United States of America: EastBridge Publishing Company.

Silverstein, Josef. (1996). The Idea of Freedom in Burma and the Political thought of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, Pacific Affairs, 69(2), 211-228.

Taylor, Robert, H. (2001). Burma: political Economy under Military Rule. London: C.Hurst and Co. (Publishers) Ltd.