TEACHING DIFFICULT HISTORY IN THE DEEP SOUTH OF THAILAND: HOW TEACHERS APPLY JUSTICE-SENSITIVE PEDAGOGY INTO THE CLASSROOMS
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The purpose of this study is: 1) to examine how teachers conceptualize Justice-sensitive Pedagogy (JSP); 2) to explore how teachers apply JSP in teaching difficult history topics; and 3) to investigate the institutional, political, and pedagogical constraints affecting the implementation of JSP in the deep south provinces of Thailand. A qualitative case study approach was used to study six secondary school teachers from six schools with diverse educational contexts. In addition, interviews were conducted with two university educators and two education policymakers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis.
The results show that teachers viewed JSP not as a completely new teaching method, but rather as an approach they had already applied indirectly in classroom practice. This indirect teaching strategy was influenced by the national curriculum, which does not explicitly include difficult history content, resulting in teaching practices that depended largely on individual teachers’ choices and interpretations. The findings also indicate that ongoing violence in the three southern provinces, as well as differences between public schools and private Islamic schools, affected the design of teaching and learning activities. Institutional limitations, political sensitivities, and pedagogical challenges were found to constrain the implementation of JSP in schools. This study argues that the effectiveness of JSP cannot rely solely on the individual abilities of teachers, but requires systematic support through teacher training, curriculum development, learning materials, and educational policies. This study provides practical insights and theoretical support for the development of history education and peace-oriented pedagogy in conflict-affected contexts.
Article Details

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารฉบับนี้ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้นเพียงผู้เดียว และไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการคัดเลือกบทความลงตีพิมพ์และจะแจ้งให้เจ้าของบทความทราบหลังจากผู้ประเมินบทความตรวจอ่านบทความแล้ว
ต้นฉบับที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารครุศาสตร์ปริทรรศน์ คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย ถือเป็นกรรมสิทธิ์ของคณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย ห้ามนำข้อความทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนไปพิมพ์ซ้ำ เว้นเสียแต่ว่าจะได้รับอนุญาตจากมหาวิทยาลัยฯ เป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Alan Mccully. (2012). History teaching, conflict and the legacy of the past. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 7(2), 145–159.
Clara Ramírez-Barat and Roger Duthie. (2017). Education and transitional justice: Opportunities and challenges for peacebuilding. International Center for Transitional Justice.
Deborah P. Britzman. (2000). If the story cannot end: Deferred action, ambivalence, and difficult knowledge. Educational Theory, 50(2), 143–159.
Elizabeth A. Cole. (2007). Transitional justice and the reform of history education. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(1), 115–137.
Hasan Madmarn. (1999). The pondok and madrasah in Patani. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.
Joseph Chinyong Liow and Don Pathan. (2010). Confronting ghosts: Thailand's shapeless southern insurgency. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Julia Paulson. (2015). "Whether and how?" History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research. Journal on Education in Emergencies, 1(1), 14–47.
Keith Barton and Alan Mccully. (2005). History, identity, and the school curriculum in Northern Ireland: An empirical study of secondary students’ ideas and perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 85–116.
Lynn Davies. (2017). Justice-sensitive education: The implications of transitional justice mechanisms for teaching and learning. Comparative Education, 53(3), 333–350.
Mario Carretero. (2011). Constructing patriotism: Teaching history and memories in global worlds. Information Age Publishing.
Mario Novelli, Mieke T. A. Lopes Cardozo and Alan Smith. (2017). The 4Rs framework: Analyzing education's contribution to sustainable peacebuilding with social justice in conflict-affected contexts. Journal on Education in Emergencies, 3(1), 14–43.
Michalinos Zembylas. (2014). Theorizing "difficult knowledge" in the aftermath of the affective turn: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(3), 390–412.
Muhammadafeefee Assalihee, Nachima Bakoh, Yusop Boonsuk and Jaruwat Songmuang. (2024). Transforming Islamic education through Lesson Study (LS): A classroom-based approach to professional development in Southern Thailand. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1029.
Robert E. Stake. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Robert K. Yin. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Sage.
Surasak Visalaporn. (2009). Educational management conditions in southern border provinces [in Thai]. Office of the Secretary of the National Education Council, Ministry of Education.
Tejendra Pherali. (2021). Social justice, education and peacebuilding: Conflict transformation in Southern Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 53, 710–727.
Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.