SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE INNOVATION FOR EDUCATION 5.O ERA UNDER SAMUT SAKHON SAMUT SONGKHRAM SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE

Main Article Content

Manisa Cheunjit
Kamolmal Chaisirithanya
Chuanchom Chinatangkul

Abstract

The objectives of this research article are: 1) to study the components of educational institution administration innovation in the 5.0 era, and 2) to propose a model of educational institution administration innovation in the 5.0 era and 3) to develop practical guidelines for implementing the model of school administrative innovation for the Education 5.0 era under the Samut Sakhon and Samut Songkhram Secondary Educational Service Area Office.  A mixed-methods research design was employed, integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data were collected through document and literature review, in-depth interviews with nine key informants, and surveys administered to a target population of 1,135 individuals. The sample size was determined using Hair and a proportionate Stratified Random sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of 678 Additionally, focus group discussions were conducted with eight experts. The research instruments included a semi-structured interview protocol, a five-point Likert scale questionnaire, and a focus group discussion guide. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, while qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis.


Findings of the research reveal that: 1) The components of school administrative innovation for the Education 5.0 era under the Samut Sakhon and Samut Songkhram Secondary Educational Service Area Office consisted of six key coponents: value creation and sustainability, integration and new learning, innovative leadership, quality participation, adaptability, and digital technology integration in administration; 2) the proposed model of school administrative innovation for the Education 5.0 era under the Samut Sakhon and Samut Songkhram Secondary Educational Service Area Office demonstrated high reliability and validity, with Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.98, Composite Reliability = 0.980, and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) = 0.90, indicating strong consistency with empirical data; and 3) the 16 guidelines for implementing school administrative innovation for the Education 5.0 era under the Samut Sakhon and Samut Songkhram Secondary Educational Service Area Office were  proposed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cheunjit, M. ., Chaisirithanya, K. ., & Chinatangkul, C. . (2026). SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE INNOVATION FOR EDUCATION 5.O ERA UNDER SAMUT SAKHON SAMUT SONGKHRAM SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE. Journal of Educational Review Faculty of Education in MCU, 13(1), 77–88. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDMCU/article/view/281652
Section
Research Article

References

กรุงเทพธุรกิจ. (2565, 25 พฤศจิกายน). ซีพี ชูธง ‘การศึกษา 5.0’ ปั้นเด็กไทย สู่ผู้นำโลกยุคดิจิทัล. แหล่งที่มา https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/csr/1040010 สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 มกราคม 2568.

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2566). TDRI ชี้ผล PISA 2022 ต่ำสุดในรอบ 20 ปี ตอกย้ำการศึกษาไทยขั้นวิกฤต ต้องเร่งแก้ไขอย่างจริงจัง. TDRI. แหล่งที่มา https://tdri.or.th/2023/12/pisa-2022-press-release/ สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 พฤษภาคม 2568.

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. (2024). Society 5.0. From https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html Retrieved July 22, 2024.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. 5th ed. Teachers College Press.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2020). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Pearson Education.

Hoyle, J. R., English, F. W. and Steffy, B. E. (2005). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders. Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E. and Milas, N. (2023). Digital Twins and Society 5.0: A review on technological and human-centric perspectives. Procedia CIRP, 119, 10–18.

Narvaez, R. A., Sanchez, C. A. and Lee, J. H. (2021). Society 5.0: The role of science, technology and innovation in building a super-smart society. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 190.

OECD. (2021). Learning cities and education for sustainable development. From https://www.oecd.org/education/ Retrieved May 25, 2025.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. From https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 Retrieved May 19, 2024.