THE ADMINISTRATION MODEL FOR LEARNING NEW STYLE ENGLISH THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE FOR LANGUAGES (CEFR) SECONDARY LEVEL LINKED TO EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: 1) to study the conditions and guidelines for organizing new English language learning according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) at the secondary level linked to educational quality assurance, 2) To develop and validate a new English language learning model based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) at the secondary level, linked to educational quality assurance, 3) Evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of new English language learning models based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) at the secondary level, linked to educational quality assurance. This research was mixed methodology research. The population of the study consisted of 63 respondents including interviews with 5 experts, and in-depth interviews with 5 experts. The instruments used in the study were questionnaires, assessment forms, and semi-structured interviews. Statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentage, means, and standard deviation. The research results revealed that: 1) The new English language learning management system according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) at the secondary level is linked to overall and individual educational quality assurance to a large extent, 2) Development and verification of the model There are 3 components: (1) organizing new English language learning according to the European Union's Language Proficiency Reference Framework (CEFR), including (2) The K-POLC (3) The educational quality assurance and 3) Results of the assessment of new English language learning management according to the European Union's Language Proficiency Reference Framework (CEFR) at the secondary level, linked to educational quality assurance in terms of feasibility and usefulness according to the issues in Examining all 5 items, namely 1) Providing knowledge, 2) Planning, 3) Organizing, 4) Leading, and  5) Controlling, it was found that all 5 items were most likely and beneficial.