ASSESSMENT REPORT AND LESSON LEARNED OF THE TEACHING AND LEARNING MANAGEMENT PROJECT BY THE IMPLEMENTED THE KING WORKING STYLES (SAPAE) MODEL IN THE EPIDEMIC SITUATION OF CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) AT WAT NONG SALA SCHOOL (PRACHANUKUL)

Abstract

This research article aims 1) to assess the project context with respect to current conditions, problems, suitability of the project objectives correspondence of project activities with project and project feasibility, 2)to assess project inputs regarding school readiness for project implementation, appropriateness of management, stakeholder participation, and 3) to evaluate the project process regarding problem survey (S), problem analysis (A), problem planning (P), action (A), and evaluation (E), and 4) evaluate the project's productivity. Mixed methods research was conducted by using Stufflebeam assessment model as a conceptual framework. The target group of the study consisted of 22 teachers, 26 school committees/advisory committees, 186 students, 205 parents. The quantitative data were analyzed by percentage, frequency, mean, standard deviation whereas qualitative data was analyzed by content analysis. Research results found that 1) current condition, problems in teaching and learning management in the situation of the epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in overall showed that the first priority is the teacher, the second priority is the model of teaching and learning, and the third priority is technology to support learning. The project context regarding principles, objectives and activities in the project is appropriate consistent with the policy of the agency under the space context and readiness of students. The project is feasible and can be implemented. 2) Assessment of the project's inputs regarding the school's readiness to implement the project is suitability of management, and the involvement of stakeholders is ready for implementation. 3) The implementation of the project process is performed at the highest level. 4) Evaluation of the project's productivity passes the evaluation criteria of 7 evaluation items and does not pass the evaluation criteria of 1 evaluation item.