A Model for Teacher Development to Enhance Student Quality in the 21st Century at Kuchinarai Municipality School
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) study the current and desired conditions for teacher development to enhance student quality in the 21st century, 2) develop a model for teacher development to enhance student quality in the 21st century at Kuchinarai Municipality School, 3) implement the teacher development model to enhance student quality in the 21st century at Kuchinarai Municipality School, and 4) evaluate and validate the teacher development model to enhance student quality in the 21st century at Kuchinarai Municipality School. This study employed a research and development approach. The target group consisted of 30 teachers who were teaching at Kuchinarai Municipality School in the first semester of the 2024 academic year, selected through purposive sampling. The sample group comprised 276 students from Grades 1-6 at Kuchinarai Municipality School who were studying in the 2024 academic year, selected through simple random sampling. The research instruments included questionnaires, evaluation forms, and tests. Data were analyzed using means, standard deviations, and content analysis. The research findings revealed that: 1) the current condition of teacher development was at a high level, the desired condition was at the highest level, with PNIModified values ranging from 0.23-0.25, where the aspect requiring the most development was 21st-century learning design (PNIModified = 0.25); 2) the teacher development model comprised five components: principles, objectives, processes, outputs, and feedback; 3) the implementation results showed that teachers perceived the model's appropriateness at the highest level, student achievement passing the 80% criterion accounted for 85.86%, and both students and teachers expressed satisfaction with learning management at the highest level; and 4) the evaluation and validation results by experts indicated the model was at a high level of appropriateness.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Amphanon, K. (2017). Teachership. Faculty of Education, Phetchabun Rajabhat University. [In Thai]
Bureau of Secondary Education Administration, OBEC. (2017). Guidelines for organizing 21st-century learning skills focusing on professional competencies. Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand Printing. [In Thai]
Chatchawarat, T. (2017). Development of an administration model for information and communication technology usage in nursing colleges under the Praboromarajchanok Institute. Journal of Nursing, Ministry of Public Health, 27, 113–125. [In Thai]
Charoenrak, P. (2020). Guidelines for developing 21st-century learning management skills of teachers by school administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 11, Surat Thani. Master's thesis, Surat Thani Rajabhat University. [In Thai]
Chanajeenasak, P, Wangkaewhiran, T, Onkasem, P & Meekhobtong, S. (2020) The Development of Teachers’ Learning Management Skill in the 21stCentury through the Professional Learning Community (PLC) at Wat Preak Nok-Eang School. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 10(2), 157–169. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrcd/article/view/243106 [In Thai]
Dueatkhunthot, N. (2021). The Model of Learning Management Skills Development for Teachers in The 21st Century of School Chachoengsao Panyanukul Chachoengsao Province. Retrieved June 8, 2025 from https://research.otepc.go.th/files/%E0%B8%89%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%
B%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%93%E0%B9%8C_jk2d32cy.pdf
Homsin, U. (2020). The creation and development of a school administration model using the I-OKRR concept at the elementary level to become a sustainable learning innovation organization. Ban Nong Bo Community School (Wichitrat Samakkhi). [In Thai]
Jarungkiattikul, S. (2018). 21st century learning skills. TruePlookpanya. Retrieved May 9, 2025, from https://www.trueplookpanya.com/education/content/66054/ [In Thai]
Jongthamma, S. (2017). The 2nd Graduate Research Conference. Rajabhat Mahasarakham University. [In Thai]
Khemmani, T. (2019). Science of teaching: Body of knowledge for effective learning process management (23rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2017). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (Revised B.E. 2560). Khurusapha Lat Phrao Printing House. [In Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2020). Announcement of the Ministry of Education on policies and emphases of the Ministry of Education for the fiscal year B.E. 2563. Ministry of Education. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2020). National scheme of education B.E. 2560-2579 (2nd ed.). Office of the Education Council. [In Thai]
Panich, W. (2019). Fostering an ecosystem for teachers as initiators. Siam Kammachol Foundation. [In Thai]
Phrasamu Narit Narinto. (2019). Teacher Development For Quality Of Learners In The 21St Century. Journal of Graduate MCU KhonKaen Campus. 6(3), 459-473 [In Thai]
Saengthanang, K. (2020). A model for developing educational institutions into innovative organizations for basic education schools [Doctoral dissertation, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University]. Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University. [In Thai]
Siritanikul N. Pusara R. & Tharasrisutti P. (2023). Guidelines of School Administration which Affect Reducing Teacher Workload from the Perception of Secondary School Teachers in Samut Songkhram Province under the Secondary Education Service Area, Samut Sakhon -Samut Songkhram. Academic Journal of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, 13(1) 52-61[In Thai]
Sinlarat, P. (2017). How to improve the quality of basic education in Bangkok [Paper from the 1st Conference on Improving the Quality of Education]. Mac Education. [In Thai]
Sombunsin, N. (2021). A MANAGEMENT MODEL OF ADMINISTRATIVE INNOVATION IN SCHOOL [Doctoral dissertation, Naresuan University] [In Thai]
Tabtimthong P. & Sudrung J. (2017). An Analysis of the Effects of Task Operating Time on Teaching Efficiency of Teachers in The Office of The Basic Education Commission. An Online Journal of Education. 12(2). 353-369.
Thavirath, J. (2024). Creating opportunities, Equality and Educational equity. Journal of Innovation in Administration and Education Management. 2(2) 25-38 [In Thai]
Thieppan, T. (2019). The development of an academic administration model to enhance learner quality in Buddhist temple charity schools in southern provinces [Doctoral dissertation, Hatyai University]. Hatyai University. [In Thai]
Vechayalak, N. (2018). Principles of learning management (1st ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Wangmeejongmee, C. (2017). Competencies of Thai teachers in the 21st century: Adjusting learning, changing competencies. Journal of the Institute for Continuing Education and Human Resources, Thammasat University, 12(2). (Note: Page numbers were not provided in the original list for this journal article). [In Thai]
Beck, R. C. (2004). Motivation: Theories and principles (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Butte J. & Meerakar A. (2022). The Relationship Between the Professional Learning Community and the Motivation on Operation of Teachers in the Schools Under the Office of Loei Primary Educational Service Area 2. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation, 8(8) 11-24
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Franken, R. E. (2007). Human motivation (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Great School Partnership. (2013). Learning environment. The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/learning-environment/
Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (2020), "Professional capital after the pandemic: revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers' work", Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 5 No. 3/4, pp. 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039
Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Kanorm S., Rotphol N., Duangngamying C., & Wanichwattanaworachai S. (2025). Development of a training course to develop teachers’ technological capabilities Under the topic of using artificial intelligence (AI) in learning management. Journal of Teacher Professional Development, 6(1), 67–81. https://ph02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/withayajarnjournal/article/view/256306
Khamkam Narongrit (2024) MODEL FOR PROMOTING TEACHERCOMPETENCY AT TRIMIT SCHOOL LEARNING MANAGEMENT TO DEVELOPIMPORTANT SKILLS OF STUDENTS IN THE21st CENTURY. Journal of MCU Ubon Review 9(2) 2124-2136
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing (17th ed.). The University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. https://open.lib.umn.edu/principlesmarketing/
Kruse, R. (2011) A New Unit Root Test against ESTAR-Based on a Class of Modified Statistics. Statistical Papers, 52, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0204-1
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Scott, C. L. (2015). The Futures of Learning 2: What Kind of Learning for the 21st Century?. UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 14]
Smith, R., & Lynch, D. (2010). Rethinking teacher education: Teacher education in the knowledge age. Sydney: AACLM Press.
