The Effects of Mathematics Learning Management Model Based on Constructivist Approach to Develop Analytical Thinking Abilities of Mathayomsuksa 1 Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study the current and desirable conditions of mathematical learning management based on constructivism theory to develop analytical thinking abilities of seventh-grade students, 2) construct and develop an instructional model, 3) examine the implementation results of the model, and 4) evaluate and validate the model. The study employed Research and Development (R&D) methodology consisting of four phases: 1) Research (R1), 2) Development (D1), 3) Research (R2), and 4) Development (D2). The sample consisted of 32 students from Mathayom 1/1 of Nongno Prachasan School, studying in the second semester of the 2024 academic year, selected through cluster random sampling. he research instruments included lesson plans, an achievement test, an analytical thinking ability assessment, and a satisfaction questionnaire. The findings revealed that: 1) The current conditions were at a low level, while the desirable conditions were at a high level. 2) The developed model, named "PIVARF Model," comprised five components: principles, objectives, instructional process, evaluation, and feedback. The instructional process consisted of six stages: Prepare (P), Involve students in Learning Activities (I), Verify Students' Understanding (V), Action (A), Reflect (R), and Free Practice (F). 3) The implementation results showed that the model had an efficiency of 81.24/82.47, an effectiveness index of 0.7043, and post-learning achievement and analytical thinking abilities were significantly higher than pre-learning at the .05 level. Students' satisfaction was at the highest level. 4) The evaluation and validation of the model were deemed highly appropriate.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bloom, B.S.. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Eisner, E. W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their form and functions in educational evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332067
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watts, M., & Fofili, Z. (1998). Towards critical constructivist teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200204
Buason, R. (2019). Research and development of educational innovations. Chulalongkorn University Publisher. [in Thai]
Bunchuailaeo, S. (2021). The study of mathematical fluency and flexibility related to equations of Grade 8 students (Master's thesis, Srinakharinwirot University). [in Thai]
Chaijaroen, S., (2016). Instructional Design: Principles and Theories to Practices. Pen Printing Company Limited: Khon Kaen, Thailand. [in Thai]
Chareonwongsak, K. (2020). Analytical thinking. Bangkok: Success Media. [in Thai]
Chuesuwanthawi, C. (2018). Mathematics teaching and learning. Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2019). Mathematics learning area curriculum usage manual (revised edition, B.E. 2560) according to the basic education core curriculum, Buddhist Era 2551. The Teachers' Council of Thailand Printing House, Ladprao. [in Thai]
Kahong, N. (2022). The development of biology learning activities promoting growth mindset and learning achievement for Grade 10 students: A mixed methods research (Master's thesis, Mahasarakham University). [in Thai]
Khammani, T. (2021). Science of teaching: Cognitive processes in order to learn effectively (25th Ed). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Manthanoo Ch., (2022). The Development of a Science Teaching and Learning Model Based on Constructivist Theory and Cooperative Learning to Enhance Analytical Thinking Skills of Mathayomsuksa 3 Students. Journal of MCU Ubon Review., 7(1), 681-694. [in Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2017). Indicators and core learning content for mathematics learning strand (Revised B.E. 2560) according to the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand Printing House. [in Thai]
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2020). Policies and Strategies for Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation 2020 – 2027. Retrieved 18 January 2022, from https://backend.tsri.or.th/files/trf/2/docs Policy_and_Strategy_of_Thailand_HESI_25632570_and_Thailand_SRI_Plan_2563-2565.pdf. [in Thai]
Munkham, S. (2010). Strategy ... teaching analytical thinking. (5th ed.). Bangkok: pakpim.
Munkham, S., & Munkham, O. (2010). 19 methods of learning management: To develop the thinking processes (9th ed.). Bangkok: Parbpim Printing. [in Thai]
National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2020). Report of the National Educational Testing Service (O-NET) for Grade 9 students, academic year 2020. National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). [in Thai]
NongNo Prachasan School. (2017). Self-assessment report (SAR) of the educational institution, academic year 2017. NongNo Prachasan School. [in Thai]
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). Driving Thai secondary education 4.0. For employment in the 21st century. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Assembly Press Thailand. [in Thai]
Petchraporn K., (2020). Science of learning management. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Phanit, W. (2017). The Ways to Create Learning for Students in the 21st Century (4th ed.). Bangkok: THE SIAM COMMERCIAL FOUNDATION. [in Thai]
Phongphuangphet Ph., Sitti S., & PiyaKul A., (2017). The Development of Science Teaching Model Based on Constructivist Theory to Enhance Knowledge Construction Ability and Eagerness to Learn of PrathomSukSa 4 Students. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 12(2), 93-106. [in Thai]
Phonyiam, T. ., Phibranchon, S. ., & Panprueksa, K. . (2019). THE STUDY OF PHYSICS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY AND PHYSICS ACHIEVEMENT ON MOMENTUM AND COLLISIONS OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS 2 BY USING THE INQUIRY METHOD INCORPORATED WITH POLYA’S PROBLEM SOLVING TECHNIQUE. Journal of Education and Innovation, 22(1), 84–95. [in Thai]
Promwong, C. (2013). Media Performance Testing or Teaching Series. Silpakorn Education and Research Journal, 5(1), 7-20. [in Thai]
Sinlarat, P. (2020). The Future of Thai Teacher Education and Literacy Development. URNAL OF TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1(1), 1-7. [in Thai]
Sintapanont, S., et al. (2019). Various teaching methods for developing quality of Thai youth. Bangkok: 9119 Technique Printing. [in Thai]
Sroisaeng, N. (2017). The effects of a 7-step inquiry-based learning cycle emphasizing the use of scientific evidence combined with graphic organizer techniques on analytical thinking and learning achievement in biology of Grade 10 students (Thesis, Faculty of Science, Burapha University). [in Thai]
Wongyai, W., & Phatthaphon, M. (2019). Learning management that enhances innovation mindset. Center for Curriculum and Learning Innovation Leadership, Srinakharinwirot University. [in Thai]
Yuphuk, S. (2019). The Development of an Instructional Model Based on Constructivism to Promote Critical Thinking for Problem Solving and Scientific Mind for Mathayom Suksa 1 Students. Journal of Education Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University (Online), 1(1), 63-73. [in Thai]
