Blended Learning in Chemistry: A Systematic Review from 2010 to 2019

Main Article Content

Anggiyani Ratnaningtyas Eka Nugraheni
Arum Adita
Niwat Srisawasdi

Abstract

Blended learning in chemistry education issue has been discussed throughout the world over the past decade. The previous review on blended learning in chemistry provides valuable insight related to learning strategies and specific courses (Nugraheni, Adita, Srisawasdi, 2020). Nevertheless, that review ignored some issues in terms of authors’ nationality, journals, research methods, research issue, education levels, online and offline learning portions, the specific model of blended learning in chemistry, and technology used in blended learning of chemistry. Hence, this study conducted a meta-review of 76 blended learning in chemistry research articles indexed by the SCOPUS database published from 2010 to 2019 to analyze these issues. The results revealed that blended learning in chemistry was implemented around the world.  It was also found that most researchers employed a quantitative methodology. Meanwhile, most studies focused on the cognitive aspect. Furthermore, most of the blended learning was applied in higher education. The proportion of online learning and offline learning that is often done is half online and half offline. This research also found that flipped classroom is the most favorite model in blended learning with video as the main technology used in blended learning in the chemistry classroom.


Keywords: Blended, hybrid, flipped, chemical, education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
บทความพิเศษ (Selected Article)

References

Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. Plos One, 14(9), e0221765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

Baykoucheva, S., Houck, J. D., & White, N. (2015). Integration of endNote online in information literacy instruction designed for small and large chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3), 470-476. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00515
Bernard, P., Broś, P., & Migdał-Mikuli, A. (2017). Influence of blended learning on outcomes of students attending a general chemistry course: Summary of a five-year-long study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 682-690. doi:10.1039/c7rp00040e
Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. Pfeiffer: San Francisco
Bokolo, A., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Mat Raffei, A. F., A/L Eh Phon, D. N., Abdullah, A., Leong Ming, G., A. Shukor, N., Shukri Nordin, M., & Baba, S. (2019). A managerial perspective on institutions’ administration readiness to diffuse blended learning in higher education: Concept and evidence. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1675203
Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968
Brewer, S. E., Cinel, B., Harrison, M., & Mohr, C. L. (2013). First-year chemistry laboratory courses for distance learners: Development and transfer credit acceptance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1446
Burchett, S., Hayes, J., Pfaff, A., Satterfield, E. T., Skyles, A., & Woelk, K. (2016). Piloting blended strategies to resolve laboratory capacity issues in a first-semester general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(7), 1217-1222. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00078
Butzler, K. B. (2015). ConfChem conference on flipped classroom: Flipping at an open-enrollment college. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1574–1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500875n
Canelas, D. A., Hill, J. L., & Novicki, A. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00014f
Casselman, M. D. (2019). Effective implementations of a partially flipped classroom for large-enrollment organic chemistry courses. ACS Symposium Series Active Learning in Organic Chemistry: Implementation and Analysis, 187-196. doi:10.1021/bk-2019-1336.ch011
Christiansen, M. A., Nadelson, L., Etchberger, L., Cuch, M., Kingsford, T. A., & Woodward, L. O. (2017). Flipped learning in synchronously-delivered, geographically-dispersed general chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 662–667. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00763
Clary, R., Dunne, J., Elder, A., Saebo, S., Beard, D., & Wax, C. et al. (2017). Optimizing online content instruction for effective hybrid teacher professional development programs. Journal Of Science Teacher Education, 28(6), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2017.1379859
Collis, B., Bruijstens, H., & van der Veen, J. K. (2003). Course redesign for blended learning: Modern optics for technical professionals. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1/2), 22–38.
Cormier, C., & Voisard, B. (2017). Flipped classroom in organic chemistry has significant effect on students’ grades. Frontiers in ICT, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00030
Debska, B., Guzowska-Swider, B., & Heclik, K. (2016). The benefits of using blended-learning methods in spectroscopy. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 26(2), 153-167. doi:10.1504/ijceell.2016.076012
Donnelly, J., & Hernández, F. E. (2018). Fusing a reversed and informal learning scheme and space: Student perceptions of active learning in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00186j
Ealy, J. B. (2013). Development and implementation of a first-semester hybrid organic chemistry course: Yielding advantages for educators and students. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 303-307. doi:10.1021/ed200858p
Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00159e
Enneking, K. M., Breitenstein, G. R., Coleman, A. F., Reeves, J. H., Wang, Y., & Grove, N. P. (2019). The evaluation of a hybrid, general chemistry laboratory curriculum: Impact on students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1058-1067. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00637
Fautch, J. M. (2015). The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00230j
Fitzgerald, N., & Li, L. (2015). Using presentation software to flip an undergraduate analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1559–1563. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500667c
Fung, F. (2017). Adopting lightboard for a chemistry flipped classroom to improve technology-enhanced videos for better learner engagement. Journal Of Chemical Education, 94(7), 956-959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00004
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between online and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In: C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.) Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing: San Francisco
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Halim, N. D. A. et al. (2017). The effects of cooperative learning activities in blossoms lesson towards students’ achievement in learning chemistry. Man in India, 97(19), 323–329.

Hanson, C. L., Ness, C. V., Gadbury-Amyot, C. C., & Crain, G. (2014). Development and outcomes of an online-onsite hybrid dental admissions enhancement pilot program. Journal of Dental Education, 78(10), 1451-1459. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.10.tb05819.x
Hibbard, L. (2019). Case studies for general chemistry: Teaching with a newsworthy story. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2528-2531. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00420
Holton, E. F., Coco, M. L., Lowe, J. L., & Dutsch, J. V. (2006). Blended delivery strategies for competency-based training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305286153
Huertas, A., Vesga, G., Vergara, A., & Romero, M. (2015). Effect of a computational scaffolding in the development of secondary students’ metacognitive skills. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2015.072030
Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
Jihad, T., Klementowicz, E., Gryczka, P., Sharrock, C., Maxfield, M., Lee, Y., & Montclare, J. K. (2018). Perspectives on blended learning through the online platform, lab Lessons, for chemistry. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(1), 34-44. doi:10.3926/jotse.312
Kaur, A., & Ahmed, A. (2006). E-learning challenges as perceived by communities of practice: Open University Malaysia's experiences. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 2(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-02-01-2006-b006
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
Kennepohl, D. K. (2013). Learning from blended chemistry laboratories. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013), IEEE Computer Society, December 18-20, 2013,Kharagpur, India.
Krasulia, A. (2015). Blended learning: Advantages and disadvantages in the classroom. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/67256
Kumar, R., & Pande, N. (2017). Technology-mediated learning paradigm and the blended learning ecosystem: What works for working professionals? Procedia Computer Science, 122, 1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.481
Lee, T. T., Sharif, A. M., & Rahim, N. A. (2018). Designing e-content for teaching basic chemistry concepts in higher education: A needs analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10246a)
Legron-Rodriguez, T. (2019). Generative learning strategies and pre-lecture assignments in a flipped forensic chemistry classroom. ACS Symposium Series, 1324, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1324.ch013
Lewis, S. E. (2018). Goal orientations of general chemistry students via the achievement goal framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00148g
Lenczewski, M. S. (2016). Scaffolded semi-flipped general chemistry designed to support rural students’ learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00320
Liu, Y., Raker, J. R., & Lewis, J. E. (2018). Evaluating student motivation in organic chemistry courses: Moving from a lecture-based to a flipped approach with peer-led team learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00153c
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., & Zhong, Z. (2019). Preliminary evaluation of a reform of methods to teach pharmaceutical polymer materials science to a class of diverse majors. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 53(4), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.53.4.122
Lo, C., & Tang, K. (2018). Blended learning with multimedia e-learning in organic chemistry course. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Kansai University, July 31 - August 2, 2018, Osaka, Japan.
Mcdowell, T. R., Schmittzehe, E. T., Duerden, A. J., Cernusca, D., Collier, H., & Woelk, K. (2019). A student-choice model to address diverse needs and promote active learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 321-328. doi:10.1007/s10956-019-9768-2
Mooring, S. R., Mitchell, C. E., & Burrows, N. L. (2016). Evaluation of a flipped, large-enrollment organic chemistry course on student attitude and achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1972–1983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00367
Nugraheni, A.R.E., Adita, A., & Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Blended learning supported chemistry course: A systematic review from 2010 to 2019. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2020), Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, November 23-27, 2020.
Olakanmi, E. E. (2016). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 127-137. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9657-x
Owston, R., York, D. N., & Malhotra, T. (2019). Blended learning in large enrolment courses: Student perceptions across four different instructional models. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4310
Ozdilek, Z. (2013). Pre-service science teachers’ perceptions about effective design of blended university chemistry courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 165–180. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84884154183&partnerID=40&md5=e527a292873a0ece9a8f9b46ec2cf6aa
Park, Y., Yu, J. H., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data: A case study in a Korean higher education institute. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.001
Parsons, A. F. (2019). Flipping introductory retrosynthetic analysis: An exemplar course to get the ball rolling. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(4), 819–822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00946
Pilcher, S. C. (2017). Hybrid course design: A different type of polymer blend. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(11), 1696–1701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00809
Pima, J. M., Odetayo, M., Iqbal, R., & Sedoyeka, E. (2018). A thematic review of blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2018010101
Ping, G. L. Y., Lok, C., Wei Yeat, T., Cherynn, T. J. Y., & Tan, E. S. Q. (2018). “Are chemistry educational apps useful?” – a quantitative study with three in-house apps. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00094d
Polizzi, N. F., & Beratan, D. N. (2015). Open-access, interactive explorations for teaching and learning quantum dynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2161–2164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00662
Premthaisong, S., Chaipidech, P., Panjaburee, P., Chaijaroen, S., Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Mobile technology facilitated chemistry learning in school: A systematic review from 2010 to 2019. In J. Shen., Y. Chang., Y. Su., & H. Ogata (Eds.) Cognitive Cities (pp. 652-662).
Rau, M. A., Kennedy, K., Oxtoby, L., Bollom, M., & Moore, J. W. (2017). Unpacking “active learning”: A combination of flipped classroom and collaboration support is more effective but collaboration support alone is not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00240
Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning-a fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4(3), 6.
Ring, J. (2017). Confchem conference on select 2016 BCCE presentations: Specifications grading in the flipped organic classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 2005–2006. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b01000
Robert, J., Lewis, S. E., Oueini, R., & Mapugay, A. (2016). Coordinated implementation and evaluation of flipped classes and peer-led team learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1993–1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00395
Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blended learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management, 55(5), 26-32.
Ryan, M. D., & Reid, S. A. (2015). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention: A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00717
Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6).
Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400868x
Seery, M. K. (2015). Confchem conference on flipped classroom: Student engagement with flipped chemistry lectures. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1566–1567. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500919u
Seraji, F., Attaran, M., & Azizi, S. M. (2019). Blended learning researches in Iran: Several fundamental criticisms. Digital Education Review, 36, 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.36.190-206
Shattuck, J. C. (2016). A parallel controlled study of the effectiveness of a partially flipped organic chemistry course on student performance, perceptions, and course completion. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1984-1992. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00393
Shen, Q. (2016). Blended learning activities in a chemistry experiment. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(1), 70–76.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying k-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.
Stewart, J. J., & Dake, G. R. (2019). Activating students’ prior knowledge using a bridge activity as an initial interactive discussion in a flipped organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2426-2431. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00370
Thomas, A. L. P. (2017). Confchem conference on select 2016 BCCE presentations: Putting your own personal twist on a flipped organic classroom and selling the idea to students. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 2013–2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00993
Thorne, K. (2004). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. Kogan Page: London.
Tsoi, M. (2010). Supporting productive integration of web 2.0-mediated collaboration. IFIP Advances In Information And Communication Technology, 324, 401-411.
Visentin, S., Ermondi, G., Vallaro, M., Scallet, G., & Caron, G. (2013). Blended learning for courses in pharmaceutical analysis.part 2. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 9(1), 93-102.
Ward, J., & La Branche, G. A. (2003). Blended learning: The convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World, 35(4), 22-23.
Watson, J. (2008, March 31). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Promising practices in online learning. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509636
Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1437-1448. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00316
Young, J. R. (2002). “Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(28), A33.
Zeng, X., Yu, C., Liu, Y., Hu, X., Hao, Q., Jiang, Y., Dai, W., Zhang, K., & Teng, B. (2018). The construction and online/offline blended learning of small private online courses of principles of chemical engineering. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22044