การสื่อสารทางการเมืองเพื่อการโต้แย้งของภาคประชาชนในประเทศไทย ระหว่าง 30 ตุลาคม พ.ศ. 2556 – 22 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2557 [Civil Contentious Political Communication in Thailand During October 30, 2013 – May 22, 2014]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is part of the research on Civil Contentious Political Communication in Thailand during October 30, 2013 - May 22, 2014. The objectives are to study Civil Contentious Political Communication led by Suthep Tuangsuban, a former secretary-general of the Democrat Party and Member of Parliament to oust the government of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and to finalize a contentious political communication model accordingly. This analysis applied Tilly and Tarrow’s contentious political concept and Tarrow’s power in movement but focused on communicational power only. The researcher used qualitative research techniques and applied the purposive sampling method to collecte data from 90 videos of Suthep’s political communication speeches, documents (both printed and online) and 16 in-depth interviews with major actors in this contentious political communication, together with participant observations. The data analysis was done after data deduction through hermenuctics interpretation. The civil contentious political communication in this research could be divided into 3 stages which were protesting against a draft amnesty bill, overthrowing Thaksin regime and establishing political reform. The contentious political communication model was developed from the contention of Thaksin’s political influences and was triggered by a draft amnesty bill, followed by the declaration of movement, and calls for supports, then escalated to collective mobilization, collective power testing and organizational launching and finally, contentious politics performance intergration.
Article Details
References
2. Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (2000). Rethinking the study of political communication. In J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (3rd ed., pp. 155-174). London: Edward Arnold, Blumler.
3. Champakhao, W. (2011). The political communication of the people's alliance for democracy: A case study of the protests post-election December 23rd, 2007. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. (Political Communication), Krirk University, Bangkok.
4. Coleman, S. (2002). Election call 2001: How politicians and the public interacted. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(4), 731-42.
5. Coleman, S. (2004). Blogs as listening posts rather than soapboxes. Retrieved September 7, 2004, from http://www.hansardsociety.org.uk
6. Curran, J. and Gurevitch, M. (eds.). Mass Media and Society (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
7. Dalton, R. J. and Burklin, W. (2003). Wahler ALS wandervogel: Dealignment and the German voter. German Politics and Society, 21(1), 57-74.
8. Davis, R. and Curtis, J. (2000). Speaking for the public: Representation and audience participation during the 1997 British general election campaign. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(1), 62-77.
9. Kanpunpong, K. (2011). The political legitimacy on political movement; People's Alliance for Democracy (25 May-2 December, 2008) and National United Front of Democracy against Dictatorship (12 March-20 May, 2010). Master thesis, M.A. (Pol. Science) Thammasat University, Bangkok.
10. Karavekphan, B. (n.d.). Suthep Thaugsuban. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://wiki.kpi.ac.th/index.php?title=สุเทพ_เทือกสุบรรณ
11. Keilbowicz, R. B. and Scherer, C. (1986). The Role of the Press in the Dynamics of Social Movements. In L. Kriesberg. Greenwich (Ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change (pp. 71-96). CT: JAI.
12. Kitprakob, S. (2015). “Kamnan Suthep” a political communication campaigner as perceived by political reporters and communication arts and political science academicians. Master thesis, M.Com. Arts., Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok.
13. Krasaesunthorn, S. (n.d.). Thaksin Shinnawat. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://wiki.kpi.ac.th/index.php?title=ทักษิณ ชินวัตร
14. Mingmaninakin, W. (2014). Thaksin regime: The beginning and the end. Manager Online. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://www.manager.co.th/daily/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=957000 0017575
15. Passy, F. and Monsch, G. (2014). Do social networks really matter in contentious politics?. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 22-47.
16. Piven, F. F. and Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
17. Polanska, D. V. (2013). The role of alliances and brokerage for collective political struggle: The case of polish tenants' movement. Retrieved October 28, 2017, from http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-2/03-polanska.pdf
18. Prasertkul, S. (2010). Civic political in Thailand’s democracy. Bangkok: Vipasa Publishing.
19. Satayawatana, C. (2014). The phenomena of mass’s power. Patumtani: Ransit University Press.
20. Sawangdee, P. (2010). Communication strategy of people's alliance for democracy.
Master thesis, M. Com.Ad., Thammasat University, Bangkok.
21. Snow, D. A. and Robert D. B. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. Morris and C. McCllurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Somjai, K. (2008). Political communication of political crisis in Thailand: A case study of people's alliance for democracy. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. (Political Communication), Krirk University, Bangkok.
23. Stanyer, J. (2007). Modern political communication. United Kingdom: Polity Press.
24. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Thaugsuban, S. (2014). The power of change Kamnan Suthep Thaugsuban. Bangkok: Lips Publishing.
26. Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Tilly, C. and Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Treesuwan, H. (2017, October 30). 4 year-whistle mob and 4 stories behind the scene of PDRC. BBC Thai. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/thai/thailand-41804763
29. Viriyothai, K. (2009). Political branding strategy of people's Alliance for democracy in 2008. Master thesis, M. Com.Ad., Thammasat University, Bangkok.
30. Zelinska, O. (2015). Who were the protestors and what did they want? Contentious politics of local maidan across Ukraine, 2013-2014. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 23(4), 379-400.
