Globalization and Politics: A Critique of Stephen Gill’s Postmodern Views

Authors

  • Gary Waddell Mahidol University International College

Abstract

In outlining his views on globalization, market civilization, and neo-liberalism, Stephen Gill’s main point of departure from an orthodox Marxian line is his use of discourse to “deconstruct” neo-liberalism. It is his combining of postmodernism and Marxism that makes his argument contradictory since Marxism is predicated on the historical-materialist view of history that states what people produce and their relationship to things that they produce conditions their social, political, and intellectual lives. Marxist ideology is a “humanist project” in which the individual is generally understood to be conscious, stable, unified, rational, and coherent. Since Foucault, and other postmodernists, call into question the existence of a lasting subject or individual, this is problematic for Gill’s argument.

References

Gill, S. (2003). Globalization Market Civilization and Disciplinary Neo-Liberalism. In Power and Resistance in the New World Order, 116-142. Palgrave Macmillan.

McGrew, A. (2008). The Logistics of Economic Globalization. In Global Political Economy, 280-311. Oxford University Press, USA.

Pierre, A. S. E. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5): 477-515.

Steger, M. B. (2002). 'The academic Debate over Globalization. In Globalism: the New Market Ideology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-28

How to Cite

Waddell, G. (2019). Globalization and Politics: A Critique of Stephen Gill’s Postmodern Views. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 19(1), 210–217. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sahasart/article/view/212332

Issue

Section

Academic Articles