Linear Structural Relationship Model Factors Influencing Organizational Health Of The Primary Educational Service Area Offices Under The Office Of Basic Education Comission
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were: to develop and validate consistency of linear structural relationship model factors influencing organizational health of the Primary Educational Service Area Offices under the Office of Basic Education Commission. The research sample selected by multi-stage random sampling which consisted of 8 0 0 director, assistant directors and group directors using multi –stage sampling by quota sampling and simple random sampling from 6 regions included 77 provinces in the Primary Educational Service Area Offices under the Office of Basic Education Commission. The data were collected using a 5-level rating scale questionnaire on factors influencing organizational health of the Primary Educational Service Area Offices under the Office of Basic Education Commission; reliability at 0.922. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient, structural equation model (SEM).
The research findings were as follows :
1. The model of factors influencing organization health of the Primary Educational Service Area Offices under the Office of Basic Education Commission was valid and consistent to the empirical data. The model indicated the Chi-square consistency 2 =119.15, df = 103, p = 0.132,
GFI = 0.99, AGFI = 0.96 , RMSEA = 0.014, SRMR = 0.013 , CN = 950.57
2. The factors influencing organizational health of the Primary Educational Service Area Offices under the Office of Basic EducationCommission consisted of 1) five factors of direct effect were transformational leadership, organizational culture, organizational climate, organization structure and organizational environment respectively. 2) four factors of indirect effect were transformational leadership, organizational environment, organizational culture, organizational climate and organizational structure respectively. and 3) five factors of total effect were transformational leadership, organizational environment, organizational climate, organizational structure and organizational culture respectively. The model accounted for 88 % of variance in organizational health of the Primary Educational Service
Area Offices under the Office of Basic Educational Commission.
Article Details
References
Affecting School Quality in the Northeast Region. Degree of Doctor
of Philosophy in Educational Administration UdonThaniRajphat
University.
Cooper, C. L. & Carteright, S. (1994). Healthy Mind : Healthy OrganizationA Proactive Approach to Occupational Stress. Human Relation,
47(2), 455-471.
Government Gazette. ( 2017) . Driving Education Reform in the Ministry of
Education in the Region, 134 (Special Episodes), 14-22.
Hoy, Wayne K. Tarter and Kottkamp. (1991). Open school healthy schools.
CA : SagePublication.
Jarin Surasereewong. (2015). The Development of Linear Structural
Relationship Model Of FzctorsInfluencling Effectiveness of the
Primary Educational Service Area Offices Under the Office of
Basic Eduacation.Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational
Administration UdonThaniRajphat University.
Kamalas Sornprasit. (2010). The Development of Organizational Health
Inventory for the Elementary School. Doctor of Philosophy
Department of Educational Administration. Graduate School.
Silpakorn University.
Kamolluck Thananunmethee. ( 2016) . Influences of Good Governance and
Organizational Culture on Organizational Effectiveness of the
Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in the NorthernRegion of
Thailand. Journal of the Association of Researchers. 21( 1) , 135-
142.
Kitiwong Sasuad. (2011). Development of Education Service Quality and The
Effectiveness of Educational Management of Rajabhat Universities
in Central Geographical Region.Journal of Business Administration
Thammasat University. 34(129), 41-51.
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
NY. Guilford Press.
Kotter, J.P. & Heskett, J. L. (1992).Corporate culture and performance. NY:
Free Press.
Lyden, J. A. ve W. E. Klingele. (2000).Supervisingorganizationalhealth.
Supervision. 61(12), 3-6
Miles, Matthew B. (1973). Planed chang and organization health figure and
ground. MA : Allyn and bacon.
Owens. R, G. (1995). Organization behavior in education. Englewood Cliffs
NJ: Prentice – Hall.
Patcharawan Kitmee. ( 2006). Causal Relationship Model of Factors and
Organizational Health of Northern Thai Private Vocationa Schools.
Joirnal of Education Administration Burapha University. 1(1).
Pharkphoom Rukhamate. (2010) . High Performance Organization in the
Public Sector: Structural Contingency Theory and Cultural
Approach. Journal of Management Sciences, 27( 1- 2), 33-46.
Pornnapa Luayklung. (2015). Transformational Leadership of Administrator
Effecting Organizational Climateof Secondary Schools
Chachoengsao Province Under Secondary Educational Service Area
Office 6. VeridianE-Journal, Slipakorn University, 8(2), 2159-2170.
Sarannee U-senyang. (2017). Causal Factors Affecting Organizational Health
of Local Administrative Organizations in the Southern Part of
Thailand. WMS Journal of Management Walailak University.
6(1), 26-43.
Steers, R. M. (1997). Organizational effectiveness: a behavioral view. Santa
Monica, CA: Good Year.
Surin Chumkaew. (2016). Organizational Culture, Transformational
Leadership and Behavior in the Philosophy of Sufficiency
Economy of Administrators in a Private Organization. NIDA
Development Journa, 56(3), 162.
Thatchai Chittranun. (2014). The Factors Affecting Organizational Health of
Educational Institutions in Northeastern Area. Journal of the
Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakrmuniversity, 33( 1) ,
96-105.