Factors Affecting Individual and Family Self-Management Behavior, and Family Well-Being in Slum Communities of Pathum Wan, Bangkok
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Thailand is leading among ASEAN countries in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, there is a challenge related to SDG 16 target family well-being, particularly in vulnerable areas like slums. This study seeks to integrate The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory to describe the individual and family management behavior that are associated with family well-being. Using a quantitative research approach, the study surveyed 260 respondents living in slum communities around Pathum Wan district, Bangkok, Thailand. The analysis revealed that participant’s family well-being scores have significant differences among household’s monthly income groups (t = 3.04, p < .003). Meanwhile, psychological and social factors, namely Psychological Capital (β = .78, p < .001), Outcome Expectancy (β = .43,
p < .001), and Social Norms (β = .62, p < .001) significantly predicted the individual and family management behavior. Moreover, the individual and family management behavior significantly predicted family well-being (β = .65, p < .001). Consequently, it is suggested that creating interventions or policies in these slum communities should prioritize these significant variables to enhance the efficacy of improving family well-being and promoting SDGs.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- วารสารสังคมศาสตร์บูรณาการ มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล อนุญาตให้สามารถนำไฟล์บทความไปใช้ประโยชน์และเผยแพร่ต่อได้ โดยอยู่ภายใต้เงื่อนไขสัญญาอนุญาต CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) โดยต้องแสดงที่มา/การอ้างอิงจากวารสาร – ไม่ใช้เพื่อการค้า – ห้ามแก้ไขดัดแปลงเนื้อหา
- ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารฯ เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับกองบรรณาธิการวารสารฯ (ซึ่งหมายรวมถึง บรรณาธิการ ผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิในกองบรรณาธิการ หรือ บรรณาธิการรับเชิญ) แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเอง ตลอดจนความรับผิดชอบด้านเนื้อหาและการตรวจร่างบทความเป็นของผู้เขียน ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับกองบรรณาธิการวารสารฯ
- กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการตัดทอน/ปรับแก้ถ้อยคำบางประการเพื่อความเหมาะสม
References
Abdi, F., Rahnemaei, F. A., Shojaei, P., Afsahi, F., & Mahmoodi, Z. (2021). Social determinants of mental health of women living in slum: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 64(2), 143-155.
Blanck, P. D. (Ed.). (1993). Interpersonal expectations: Theory, rsearch and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Brayshev, A. A., & Kashchuk, I. (2016). Socio-economic, psychological and ecological aspects of lifelong well-being. In I. Ardashkin, & N. Martyushev (Eds.), SHS Web Conferences, 28, Article 01118. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20162801118
Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2016). Sample size guideline for correlation analysis. World, 3(1), 37-46.
Cuaton, G. P., & Su, Y. (2023). Potentials and pitfalls of social capital ties to climate change adaptation: an exploratory study of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines. Third World Quarterly, 44(7), 1565-1585.
Cui, P., Mao, Y., Shen, Y., & Ma, J. (2021). Moral identity and subjective well-being: The mediating role of identity commitment quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9795.
Garcia, D., Moradi, S., Amato, C., Granjard, A., & Cloninger, K. (2018). Well‐being and moral identity. PsyCh journal, 7(1), 53-54.
Gray, R., (2018). Chapter 1: Well-being: Concept, dimension, index and measurement. In Well-being in Thailand: Dream or Reality (1st ed., pp. 3-50). https://ipsr.mahidol.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/473-IPSRConference-2018-1.pdf
Herman, J. L., Webb, N. M., & Zuniga, S. A. (2007). Measurement issues in the alignment of standards and assessment: A case study. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 101–126.
Intarakamhang, U., & Macaskill, A. (2022). Effectiveness of a health literacy intervention based on transformative learning and incorporating positive psychology on health behavior and well-being of Thai families with NCDs risk. Journal of Public Health Research, 11(2), jphr-2021.
Institute for Population and Social Research (IPSR), Mahidol University. (n.d.). Thai health 2022: The Thai Family & COVID-19 (1st ed.). [E-Book]. https://ipsr.mahidol.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/575-ThaiHealthReport2022-ENG_compressed.pdf
Izzo, F., Baiocco, R., & Pistella, J. (2022). Children’s and adolescents’ happiness and family functioning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416593
McKeown, K., Haase, T., Pratschke, J., Kennedy, G. (2003). Family well-being: What Makes a Difference? https://www.lenus.ie/handle/10147/287393
Nakfon, P. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goal 16 report. https://www.oja.go.th/2020/08/25/sdgs16-refinal2563
Phetchana,S. (2015). Self-management strategies of Baan Munkong-Suanplu community, Sathorn, Thammasat University Theses and Dissertations of Community Development.
Roy, D., & Lees, M. (2020). Understanding resilience in slums using an agent-based model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 80, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101458
Ryan, P., & Sawin, K. J. (2009). The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nursing Outlook, 57(4), 217-225.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004
Sabri, M., Wijekoon, R., & Rahim, H. (2020). The influence of money attitude, financial practices, self-efficacy and emotion coping on employees’ financial well-being. Management Science Letters, 10(4), 889-900.
Sahachaisaeree, N. (2008). The prospect of low-cost housing provision by the private sector:
A case study on the urban poor in Bangkok. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 117, 105-114.
Sustainable Development Report 2023. (n.d.). Dashboards.sdgindex.org. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/chapters/part-2-the-sdg-index-and-dashboards#figure-2-18-2023-sdg-dashboards-for-east-and-south-asia-levels-and-trends
Thammanawat, K. (2022). Lessons learned from the low-income community management process during the COVID-19 crisis: Case study of Ban Krua community, Ratchathewi district, Bangkok, Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD). 6198. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/6198
Thayansin, S., Tejaguta, C., Patrayotin, N., & Phuphaibul, R. (2020). Family well-being in Bangkok metropolis: Definition and relating factors. Journal of Safety and Health, 14(1), 68-83.
Trask, B. S. (2022). Urbanization, migration, and the family dimension https://www.un.org/development/desa/family/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2022/04/UN.Keynote.Urbanization.Trask_.2022.pdf
UNICEF (2021). Defining social norms and related concepts. https://www.unicef.org/documents/defining-social-norms-and-related-concepts
University of Minnesota. (2016). Sociological perspectives on the family. https://open.lib.umn.edu/sociology/chapter/15-2-sociological-perspectives-on-the-family/
Wong, B. Y.-M., Lam, T.-H., Lai, A. Y.-K., Wang, M. P., & Ho, S.-Y. (2021). Perceived benefits and harms of the COVID-19 pandemic on family well-being and their sociodemographic disparities in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031217.
Yuyajen, M., Kalka, S., Buranarek, S., & Kaewchantra, K. (2018). A study of factors related to depression in a slum community. Journal of Health and Nursing Research (Journal of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok), 34(3), 100–107.
Zawadzki, R. S., Grill, J. D., & Gillen, D. L. (2023). Frameworks for estimating causal effects in observational settings: Comparing confounder adjustment and instrumental variables. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01936-2