Public Space Use Patterns of Wat Chaeng Sirisamphan Community, Nonthaburi Province

Main Article Content

Weerawan Sathonghoy
Phanyamon Hangnak
Ruj Rattanapahu

Abstract

This study analyzes how public spaces are used by the Thai-Buddhist and Muslim communities in the Wat Chaeng Siri Samphan area. Although the community faces urban decay, it possesses a rich shared history and cultural potential. The research aims to provide practical guidelines for revitalizing these spaces to preserve the community’s unique identity.The results suggest that transforming vacant areas into vibrant markets can showcase the food and products of both cultures, attracting both locals and visitors. Waterfront areas should be developed into relaxing spots with connected walkways for continuous use. For abandoned spaces, sports grounds, and temple areas, the study proposes adding flexible features like movable benches or lightweight roofs to support both daily recreation and religious ceremonies. Additionally, turning small neglected alleys into formal resting points will improve safety and reduce deterioration While these improvements support the identity of both groups, differences in how they use space for religion and daily life remain clear. As social and economic changes continue to reduce available public space, this study offers a framework to bring underutilized areas back to life, ensuring they serve the diverse needs of the Wat Chaeng Siri Samphan community

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sathonghoy, W., Hangnak, P., & Rattanapahu, R. (2026). Public Space Use Patterns of Wat Chaeng Sirisamphan Community, Nonthaburi Province. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 8(2), 30–48. retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jadc/article/view/282576
Section
Research Articles

References

กรมโยธาธิการและผังเมือง. (2562). แนวทางการกำหนดที่โล่งในเขตผังเมืองรวม. กระทรวงมหาดไทย. http://www.dpt.go.th/v3/index.php/th/research-planning/manual/2562-manual-open-space

Fan, Y., Das, K. V., & Chen, Q. (2011). Neighborhood green, social support, physical activity, and stress: Assessing the cumulative impact. Health & Place, 17(6), 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.008

Francis, M. (1989). Control as a dimension of public-space quality. Environment and Behavior, 21(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589211001

Garnham, H. L. (1985). Maintaining the spirit of place: A guide to place-making in small towns. PDA Publishers.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Penguin Books.

Krier, R. (1979). Urban space. Academy Editions.

Lennard, S. H. C., & Lennard, H. L. (1995). Livability by design. Gondolier Press.

Lofland, L. H. (2018). A world of strangers: Order and action in urban public space. Waveland Press.

Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Pergamon Press.

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.