ASSESSING SMOKING BEHAVIOR IN THAILAND’S INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS AFTER THE REMOVAL OF DESIGNATED SMOKING ROOMS: A POLICY PERSPECTIVE USING NUDGES PRINCIPLE

Authors

  • Chayanee Wongsuriyanan Faculty of Health Science Technology, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Naowarut Charoenca Thailand Health Promotion Institute, National Health Foundation
  • Nipapun Kungskulniti Thailand Health Promotion Institute, National Health Foundation
  • Chutarat Khaita Department of Sanitary Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University
  • Suwanna Ruangkanchanasetr Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center, Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Vijj Kasemsup Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center, Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Passara Jongkhajornpong Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center, Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Stephen Lorin Hamann Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center, Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jesm.2025.10

Keywords:

Smoke-Free Airports, Designated Smoking Rooms (DSRs), Nudge Theory, Public Health Policy, Thailand International Airports

Abstract

Despite clear scientific evidence on the health risks of secondhand smoke (SHS) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in airport environments, smoking behavior in designated non-smoking areas remains a policy challenge in many countries, including Thailand. This study aimed to assess smoking behavior within and around four major international airports in Thailand-Suvarnabhumi, Don Mueang, Chiang Mai, and Phuket-following the official removal of Designated Smoking Rooms (DSRs) in 2019. Using a structured observation methodology and a behavioral “nudges” framework to analyze behaviors, the findings revealed that 99.7% of smokers complied with indoor smoking bans, indicating that the absence of DSRs does not hinder effective law enforcement. However, smoking violations were still observed in outdoor areas, often linked to spatial and communicative design limitations, such as the lack of clear directional signage to smoking zones or the absence of clearly defined non-smoking boundaries. This study proposes the application of the "Nudges" framework to redesign choice architecture that promotes desirable behavior. Drawing on successful case studies from Copenhagen Airport and Singapore’s smoke-free policy, the research highlights how non-coercive behavioral interventions can effectively reduce policy violations without relying on punitive measures. The findings suggest that this nudge approach offers an effective and sustainable management of public spaces. Moreover, we strongly discourage the establishment of smoking rooms inside airport buildings, as they pose increased health risks to both passengers and airport staff.

References

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers . (2023). ASHRAE position document on environmental tobacco smoke. https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/about/position%20documents/pd-on-environmental-tobacco-smoke-english.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014). Ventilation does not effectively protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/secondhand-smoke/protection/ventilation.htm

Civil Service College Singapore. (2017). Nudging Singapore to be cleaner and greener. Ethos, 17. https://knowledge.csc.gov.sg/ethos-issue-17/nudging-singapore-to-be-cleaner-and-greener/

Deressa, W., Hirpa, S., Argefa, T. G., Tefera, Y., Kassa, S. A., Kitonyo-Devotsu, R., Awuor, W., Zewdie, B., & Mdege, N. D. (2025). Compliance with smoke-free laws in hospitality venues in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional observational study in 10 cities. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0319079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319079

Feldman, R.S. (2011). Understanding Psychology. (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732

King, B., Tynan, M., Promoff, G., Babb, S., Johnson, J. L., & Agaku, I. (2012). Indoor air quality at nine large-hub airports with and without designated smoking areas - United States, October–November 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(46), 948–951. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6146a4.htm

Kungskulniti, N., Charoenca, N., Peesing, J., Trangwatana, S., Hamann, S., Pitayarangsarit, S., & Chitanondh, H. (2015). Assessment of secondhand smoke in international airports in Thailand, 2013. Tobacco Control, 24(6), 532–535. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol‑2013‑051313

Lee, K., Hahn, E. J., Robertson, H. E., Whitten, L., Jones, L. K., & Zahn, B. (2010). Air quality in and around airport enclosed smoking rooms. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(6), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq054

Mock, J, & Hendlin, Y.H. (2019). Notes from the Field: Environmental Contamination from E-cigarette, Cigarette, Cigar, and Cannabis Products at 12 High Schools - San Francisco Bay Area, 2018-2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(40), 897–899. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6840a4

National Environment Agency. (2024). Orchard Road No Smoking Zone. https://www.nea.gov.sg/ORNSZ

Namlabut, S., & Lamyai, W. (2018). The assessment of the effectiveness of the national measures for smoke-free environment in Nong Khai Province. Public Health & Health Laws Journal, 4(2), 133–151. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_law/article/view/161417

Pandey, A. K., Jacob, A. G., Palanivel, C., Dongre, A., Singh, R. J., & Lal, P. (2017). Do exceptions to smokefree environment work? A case study of designated smoking rooms in Indian civil airports. International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases, 2(3), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_26_17

Pion, M., & Givel, M. S. (2004). Airport smoking rooms don't work. Tobacco Control, 13(Suppl 1), i37–i40.

Sayette, M. A., Loewenstein, G., Kirchner, T. R., & Travis, T. (2005). Effects of smoking urge on temporal cognition. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.88

Schmidt, K., Schuldt-Jensen, J., Carøe Aarestrup, S., Rathman Jensen, A., Lund Skov, K., & Guldborg Hansen, P. (2017). Nudging smoke in airports: A case study in nudging as a method. iNudgeyou. https://inudgeyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/OP-ENG-Nudging_Smoke_in_Airports.pdf

Singh, A. (2023). Tobacco control in Ghana: Evidence from qualitative and cross-sectional studies (Tampere University Dissertations No. 746) [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University]. Tampere University Press. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/145972/978-952-03-2762-0.pdf?sequence=2

Sirichotiratana, N., Yogi, S., & Prutipinyo, C. (2013). Perception of tourists regarding the smoke-free policy at Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Bangkok, Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(9), 4012–4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094012

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the Surgeon General. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53017/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the Surgeon General. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/

World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228

World Health Organization. (2013). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC): Guidelines for implementation of Article 8. https://fctc.who.int/publications/m/item/guidelines-for-implementation-of-article-8

World Health Organization. (2025, June 25). Tobacco (Fact sheet No. 339). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco

World Health Organization (WHO). (1997). Tobacco or health: a global status report.

Wagner, J., Sullivan, D. P., Faulkner, D., Fisk, W. J., Alevantis, L. E., Dod, R. L., Gundel, L.A & Waldman, J.M. (2004). Environmental Tobacco Smoke Leakage from Smoking Rooms. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620490275902

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Wongsuriyanan, C., Charoenca, N., Kungskulniti, N., Khaita, C., Ruangkanchanasetr, S., Kasemsup, V., Jongkhajornpong, P., & Lorin Hamann, S. (2025). ASSESSING SMOKING BEHAVIOR IN THAILAND’S INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS AFTER THE REMOVAL OF DESIGNATED SMOKING ROOMS: A POLICY PERSPECTIVE USING NUDGES PRINCIPLE. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT, 21(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.14456/jesm.2025.10

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย Research