ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATION APPROACHES FOR ENHANCING LANDSCAPE DESIGN SKILLS AT GUANGXI Y COLLEGE, CHINA
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) investigate the current status of landscape design skills among students, teachers, administrators, and employers at Guangxi Y College; 2) propose academic administration approaches to enhance these skills. The sample included 255 students, 33 teachers and administrators, and 12 employers, selected by stratified random sampling using the Krejcie and Morgan formula. Data were collected via questionnaires and focus group meetings, with questions validated by three experts through the IOC method. Quantitative analysis (percentages, means, standard deviations) was applied.
Results indicate that landscape design skills at Guangxi Y College are generally low and need improvement. Students expressed that theoretical courses do not effectively support understanding and application of design concepts, and they expect stronger industry collaboration. Teachers and administrators pointed out the limitations of the current curriculum and emphasized the need to strengthen faculty expertise. Employers noted a gap between training and real-world demands and hope to see improvements in teachers’ industry experience. The proposed academic administration approaches focus on four dimensions: 1) Teaching approaches (student-centered interactive models, design thinking workshops); 2) Curriculum system (modular and interdisciplinary courses); 3) Faculty development (dual-track promotion, corporate residency); 4) Industry collaboration (innovation labs, internships). These approach integrate cognitivism and constructivism learning theories to form a "four-dimensional collaborative" framework for enhancing landscape design skills.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารฉบับนี้ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้นเพียงผู้เดียว และไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการคัดเลือกบทความลงตีพิมพ์และจะแจ้งให้เจ้าของบทความทราบหลังจากผู้ประเมินบทความตรวจอ่านบทความแล้ว
ต้นฉบับที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารครุศาสตร์ปริทรรศน์ คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย ถือเป็นกรรมสิทธิ์ของคณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย ห้ามนำข้อความทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนไปพิมพ์ซ้ำ เว้นเสียแต่ว่าจะได้รับอนุญาตจากมหาวิทยาลัยฯ เป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร
References
Bada, S. O. and Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
Doyle, T. (2023). Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Lee, E. and Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational technology research and development, 64, 707-734.
Leitao, A. B. and Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and urban planning, 59(2), 65-93.
Mahardhani, A. J., Nadeak, B., Hanika, I. M., Sentryo, I. and Kemala, R. (2023). A New Approach to Curriculum Development: The Relevance of the Higher Education Curriculum to Industry Needs. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(2), 501-509.
Memlük, M. Z. (2012). Urban landscape design. Landscape planning.
Paniagua, A. and Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments. Educational Research and Innovation, 17-42.
Ratsuanjit, T. and Wannakum, W. (2024). Academic Leadership of Educational Institution Administrators under the Jurisdiction of Udon Thani Primary Educational Service Office Area 2. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 4(5), 1105-1126.
Resnick, L. B. (2017). Toward a cognitive theory of instruction. In Learning and motivation in the classroom. Routledge.
Rumjaun, A. and Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory-albert bandura. Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory.
Saryanto, S., Sahib, A., Soegiarto, I., Musmulyadin, M. and Retnaningsih, R. (2024). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Lecturer Development Programs in the Context of Higher Education Management. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(2), 214-223.
Vincent, S. and Focht, W. (2011). Interdisciplinary environmental education: elements of field identity and curriculum design. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1, 14-35.
Xu, F. and Su, Y. (2024). Study on the Alignment Between Talent Training Directions and Employment Market Demands in the Landscape Architecture Industry. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(5), 80-84.
Zalsos, E. and Corpuz, G. G. (2024). Academic Management and Instructional Practices of Higher Education Institutions in Lanao Del Norte: Basis for Faculty Development Plan. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(2), 19-38.