An Analysis of Asymmetry in Para Rubber Price Transmission in Thailand

Main Article Content

ปณธกร ตันติศิริวัฒน์
อภิชาต ดะลุณเพธย์
วิศิษฐ์ ลิ้มสมบุญชัย

Abstract

Abstract


The objectives of this research were to analyze Para rubber price transmission and test for asymmetry in price transmission and adjustment toward long run equilibrium among rubber markets. Daily rubber prices used in the analysis were SICOM rubber futures, export, wholesale, and local market prices.  The prices were obtained from SICOM, Rubber Authority of Thailand and Hatyai Central Rubber Market from 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2016. The data were analyzed using Cramon-Taubadel and Loy error correction model. The results indicated that wholesale and local prices reacted faster on price decrease than price increase to the change from the futures and export markets. On the other hand, local price reacted faster on price decrease than price increase to the change from wholesale market. Long run estimation revealed that exporters exerted market power over wholesalers and farmers. The findings revealed the presence of asymmetric price transmission in Thailand rubber markets. This research found that exporters’ market power and market inefficiency led to losses in farmers’ income.


Keywords: 1) Asymmetric Price Transmission 2) Rubber Markets 3) Time Series Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
ตันติศิริวัฒน์ป., ดะลุณเพธย์อ., & ลิ้มสมบุญชัยว. (2019). An Analysis of Asymmetry in Para Rubber Price Transmission in Thailand. Journal of Business, Economics and Communications, 14(3), 27-40. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/BECJournal/article/view/156195
Section
บทความวิจัย (Research article)

References

1. Borenstein, S., Cameron, A. C. and Gilbert, R. (1997). Do gasoline prices respond asymmetrically to crude oil price changes?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 305-339.

2. Charemza, W. W. and Deadman, D. F. (1997). New directions in econometric practice
(2nd ed.). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

3. Chawanisakul, U. (2001). An analysis of Thailand’s natural rubber export potential.
Master thesis, M.S., Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

4. Chen, L., Finney, M. and Lai, K. S. (2005). A threshold cointegration analysis of asymmetric price transmission from crude oil to gasoline prices. Economic Letters, 89(2), 233-239.

5. Cramon-Taubadel, S. and Loy, J. (1996). Price asymmetry in the international wheat market: Comment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(3), 311-317.

6. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.

7. Goodwin, B. K. and Holt, M. T. (1999). Price transmission and asymmetric adjustment in the U.S. beef sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(3), 630-637.

8. Houck, J. P. (1977). An approach to specifying and estimating nonreversible functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3), 570-572.

9. Jarenmoon, A. (2006). An analysis of market integration and price forecasting of ribbed smoked sheet No.3 of Thailand. Master thesis, M.S., Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

10. Jatuporn, C. and Sukprasert, P. (2016). Price integration analysis among rubber markets of Thailand. RMUTT Global Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 1-9.

11. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.

12. Kasikorn Research Center. (2015). Struggle through Thailand rubber crisis in 2015. Kasikornthai Econ Analysis, 21(2609), 1-5.

13. McLaren, A. (2015). Asymmetry in price transmission in agricultural markets. Review of Development Economics, 19(2), 415-433.

14. Meyer, J. and Cramon-Taubadel, S. (2005). Asymmetric price transmission: A survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 581-611.

15. Office of Agricultural Economics. (2016). Thailand rubber production. Retrieved December 8, 2017, from http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/production/pararubber.pdf

16. Pisitsupakul, K. (2014). Background and pricing in Thailand rubber markets. Focus and quick (FAQ). Bangkok: Bank of Thailand.

17. Prince of Songkla University. (2015). Thailand rubber development plan in 2015-2019. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from http://blog.senate.go.th/profile/chusak.l/uploads/files/file_1418835161. pdf

18. Rubber Research Institute. (2017). Thailand rubber statistics. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

19. Tantiwanitchanon, T. (2011). Price transmission in rubber futures. Independent study, M.S., Thammasat University, Bangkok.

20. Ward, R. W. (1982). Asymmetry in retail, wholesale, and shipping point pricing for fresh vegetables. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(2), 205-212.

21. Zainalabidin, M. and Iliyasu, A. (2015). Analysis of asymmetric price transmission of selected vegetables in Peninsula Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 11(S), 87-100.