Liberal forms of exclusion in international education: A postcolonial reading
บทคัดย่อ
Over the past two decades, the cultural politics of race and gender in language education has received a great deal of attention. However, this is less so in Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand. This is not so much because these issues are absent from education in Southeast Asia, but more because, in countries such as Thailand, there is a great deal of unwillingness to examine questions related to race, even though aspects of international education in Thailand is profoundly raced and racist. This is evident indirectly in the curriculum and pedagogy, and more directly in employment recruitment and staffing of language centers, be they international schools, private language schools, language departments within private schools, or government and semi-government agencies such as the British Council, and Thai government universities. In fact, the racist privileging and exclusion has a mundane sameness throughout the industry, with Whites, especially those of Anglo-American background, capitalizing on the easy association Thais make between skin color and English language proficiency. The paper is divided into two parts. First, drawing from a wide range of in-school publication and press articles, it documents and analyzes, in a close-up way, the techniques and strategies of the cultural politics of privilege and liberal forms of exclusion within the field of teaching English as a foreign language in international schools in Thailand (EFL). More specifically, it looks at some of the ways in which English negatively affects the lives of Asian children in and out of the classroom, and the way this is often justified by school administrators, parents and the wider Thai community. The second section of the paper examines the way in which the concept of the “native speaker” works to privilege, marginalize, include and exclude teachers of various backgrounds. It begins by situating the native speaker issue theoretically before examining how it works empirically in racial discrimination in teacher recruitment.
References
Bangkok Post, (February 1, 2006). p.2.
Bennetts, A. (December 2004). “The English Speech Competition,” The Big Chili, p.11.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.
Broughton, M. M. (1996). “The Importance of the Teaching of English in the Thai Educational System,” in M. Newbrook, ed. English is an Asian Language: The Thai Context, Macquarie, NSW.: The Macquarie Library.
Butcher, C. A. (2005). “The Case Against the Native Speaker,” English Today, Vol. 21. No. 2 pp.15.
Castles, S. (2000). Ethnicity and Globalization. London: Sage Publications.
Cole, P. (2000). Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cook, V. (1999). “Going Beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching,” TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 185-209.
Douglas, I. C. (June 17, 2003). “Points Make Prizes,” Bangkok Post, (Learning Post), p.1.
EL Gazette. (February 2003). “Taiwan Wants Native Speakers; Locals Angry,” EL Gazette, Issue 277, p.1.
Fredrickson, T. (January 15, 2002). “Swimming in the Mainstream,” Bangkok Post, (Learning Post), p.1.
Gibb, M. (September, 2002). “Hong Kong School Accused of Racism,” EL News, p. 2.
Kandiah, T. (1998). “Epiphanies of the Deathless Native User’s Manifold Avatars: A Postcolonial Perspective on the Native Speaker,” in R. Singh, ed., The Native Speaker: Multilingual Perspectives, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Nation, The (12 February, 2003). p.4A.
Paikeday, T.M. (1985). The Native Speaker is Dead! Toronto: Paikeday Publishing.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the Discourses. London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992). “ELT: The Native Speaker’s Burden?” ELT Journal, Vol. 46. No. 1, pp. 12-18.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism, London: Longman.
Rampton, M. B.H. (1990). “Displacing the Native Speaker; Expertise, Affiliation and Inheritance,” ELT Journal, Vol. 44. No. 2, pp. 97-101;
Respect Diversity in English, (May 14, 2003). The Nation, p.4A.
Wijayasingha, J. (March 8, 2001) “An Educational Alternative,” Bangkok Post, (Outlook), p.3.
Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
ฉบับ
บท
License
บทความหรือข้อคิดเห็นใดๆ ในวารสารสหศาสตร์เป็นวรรณกรรมของผู้เขียนโดยเฉพาะ คณะสังคมศาสตร์และมนุษยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล และกองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย
กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์ในการคัดลอกบทความเพื่อการศึกษาแต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มาให้ครบถ้วนสมบูรณ์
ท่านที่ประสงค์จะส่งบทความ ผลงานวิจัย ข้อคิดเห็นทางวิชาการลงตีพิมพ์วารสารสหศาสตร์ กรุณาส่งมาที่คณะสังคมศาสตร์และมนุษยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล