Future Trends for Public Administration Discipline
Keywords:
public administration, trends in public administration, public administration ecologAbstract
The field of public administration is constantly evolving especially in this era where there are more dramatic and rapid changes in society and technology. Those changes become the key factors affecting on public policy and public management and having the impact on policy implementation on every level. One of the key questions from scholars in public administration field of study is that “What should be taught in public administration program”. Searching for this answer, scholar should pay attention to the study of public administration trends. This article has the objective to review the trends of public administration topics which has impact on the program content. The author presents the changes and challenges emerging in this era affecting on the public management. Several key aspects of public administration were discussed in order to pinpoint global trends in public administration which are effected from global factors arising from administrative ecology.
References
Allio, L. (2014). Design Thinking for Public Service Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/capacity-building/global-centre-for-public-service-excellence/DesignThinking.html
Beauchamp, G.A. (1981). Curriculum Theory. (4th ed.). Itsca: FE Peacock Publisher.
Curry, D. (2014). Trends for the Future of Public Sector Reform: A Critical Review of Future-Looking Research in Public Administration. Retrieved from http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TrendsForTheFutureOfPublic SectorReform.pdf
Everest-Phillips, Max. (2014). From New Public Management to New Public Passion: Restoring the Intrinsic Motivation of Public Officials. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/capacity-development/English/Singapore%20Centre/NotesPSE1_PublicPassion.pdf
Gerrits, L. M. (2008). The gentle art of coevolution: a complexity theory perspective on decision making over estuaries in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands. Rotterdam, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Oliva, P. (1992). Developing Curriculum. (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publisher.
Pollitt, C. (2014). Future Trends in European Public Administration and Management: An Outside-In Perspective. Retrieved from http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/FutureTrendsInEuropeanPublicAdministrationAndManagement. pdf
Robertson, P.J., & Choi, T. Ecological Governance: Organizing Principles for an Emerging Era. Public Administration Review 3 December 2010. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02250.x
Saylor G., & Alexander, W.M. (1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. (3rd ed.).
New York: Holt Rinchart and Winston.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development. Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Teisman, G.R., L. Gerrits, & Buuren V. (2009). Managing Complex Governance Sytems. Dynamics, Selforganization and Coevolution in Public Investments. New York: Routledge.
Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion, et al. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership
from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), pp. 298-318.
United Nations Development Program Global Centre for Public Service Excellenc. (2015). Trends for the Future of Public Sector Reform: A Critical Review of Future-Looking Research in Public Administration. Retrieved from http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TrendsForTheFutureOfPublicSectorReform.pdf
UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence (2015). Stewardship of the Future: Using Strategic Foresight in 21st Century Governance (Discussion Paper 08-01). Retrieved at : http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/capacity-building/Stewardship.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏธนบุรี
- บทความในวารสารวิชาการมนุษย์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏธนบุรี เป็นความคิดเห็นของผู้นิพนธ์ ไม่ใช่ความคิดเห็นของกองบรรณาธิการ และไม่ใช่ความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการและ/หรือของคณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏธนบุรี
- กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์ในการคัดลอก แต่ให้อ้างอิงแสดงที่มา
- บทความที่ได้รับตีพิมพ์จะมีการตรวจความถูกต้องเหมาะสมจากกองบรรณาธิการและผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิในสาขาที่เกี่ยวข้อง (peer review) จำนวน 3 คน โดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิจะไม่ทราบผู้นิพนธ์ และผู้นิพนธ์ไม่ทราบชื่อผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ (double-blind peer review)
