Development of the CoPIL Learning Model to Enhance Project Skills and Innovative Thinking among Pre-service Teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are 1) to study the current conditions; 2) Develop and monitor the quality of the model, and 3) study the effect of using the CoPIL model on project skills, innovative thinking skills, and satisfaction of student teachers. The research uses research and development methodologies. The sample group was students of the Department of Innovation and Computer Education, Faculty of Education, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University. 30 students in the third year were randomly selected in a random group. CoPIL format, a set of learning activities, a guide to using the model, a project skill assessment, an innovative thinking skills assessment, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Analyze the data with the mean, standard deviation. Expert Conformity Index, Model Performance Values (E1/E2) and Correlational Sample T Values Tests
The results showed that
(1) teacher students have the necessary needs to develop project skills and innovative thinking skills; Especially in the field of problem analysis. Innovative Design
(2) The CoPIL learning model consists of 5 steps: 1) collaborative problem exploration, 2) finding opportunities for innovation, 3) project design, 4) innovation development, 5) reflection on learning outcomes, and
(3) post-use model. Students have higher project-making and innovative thinking skills than before the study and have the highest level of satisfaction with learning manage
Downloads
Article Details
References
กระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. (2566). นโยบายการอุดมศึกษาเพื่อการพัฒนาประเทศ.
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560–2579.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา. (2565). มาตรฐานผลการเรียนรู้ระดับอุดมศึกษา.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560–2579.
Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
Bell (2010) Project-based learning for the 21st century. https://knilt.arcc.albany.edu/images/4/45/Project-Based_Learning_for_the_21st_Century-_Skills_for_the_future.pdf
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). Longman.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12533
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. ASCD.
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. Scribner.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Can flipped classroom pedagogy offer promising perspectivesfor mathematics education on pandemic-related issues? A systematic literature review.ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(1), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01388-w
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
