Development of Blended and Microlearning Management for Student Teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study Need Assessment analysis for student teachers’ learning management courses, 2) study Blended and Microlearning management for student teachers, 3) compare academic achievement of Pre-learning and Post-learning in Application programs for learning management’s course, and 4) study the satisfaction of this learning management from student teachers. Sample groups consisted of 33 undergraduate student teachers by Simple Random sampling method from 4th year students who enrolled in Application programs for learning management course in 1st semester of 2024 and were studying in the Bachelor of Technology Digital for Education program in the Industrial Education faculty of Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi (RMUTT). Research instruments consisted of 1) Need Assessment questionnaire, 2) Suitability evaluation form of the learning management plan, 3) Academic achievement test, and 4) Satisfaction questionnaire. Research statistics consisted of descriptive statistics and comparative statistic (t-test dependent).
The findings consisted of
1) The top three of Need Assessment ranking were the Coding Language Programming, Advanced Spreadsheet, and Graphic Design (PNImod = 0.056, 0.018, and 0.018, respectively),
2) The learning management plan’s suitability was qualified at a high level (=4.33, S.D.= 0.14) 3) The average of Posttest achievement scores (
=40.84, S.D.=3.7
3) was higher than Pretest achievement scores (=6.94, S.D.=2.24) significantly statistic at .05
4) The Satisfaction for the learning management was met a high level (=4.43, S.D.=0.65) all aspects; especially, the Activities (
=4.52, S.D.=0.62) and Microlearning media (
=4.51, S.D.=0.61) aspects met the highest level.
Downloads
Article Details
References
พรรณี ลีกิจวัฒนะ. (2558). วิธีการวิจัยทางการศึกษา (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 12). คณะครุศาสตร์อุตสาหกรรม สจล.
วิชชญา กันบุรมย์ และแสงสุรีย์ ดวงคำน้อย. (2566). การพัฒนาความสามารถการคิดอย่างมีวิจารณญาณและทักษะกระบวนการทางวิทยาศาสตร์โดยการจัดการเรียนรู้แบบผสมผสานการสืบเสาะหาความรู้ 7E ร่วมกับเทคโนโลยี ดิจิทัลสำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3. วารสารวิชาการและวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ, 13(2), 60-67. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/neuarj/article/view/265493
ศยามน อินสะอาด. (2561). การออกแบบบทเรียนอีเลิร์นนิงเพื่อพัฒนาทักษะการคิดขั้นสูง. ซีเอ็ดยูเคชั่น.
สิริรัตนา มุงคุณโคตร, วีรวิชญ์ เลิศรัตน์ธำรงกุล และวรินทร์ ไทยรักษ์. (2566). การพัฒนาการจัดการเรียนรู้แบบผสมผสานโดยใช้โครงงานเป็นฐานเพื่อส่งเสริมทักษะการคิดเชิงคำนวณ วิชาวิทยาการคำนวณ สำหรับนักเรียน ชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 2. วารสารวิชาการและวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ, 13(4), 136-150. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/neuarj/article/view/269022
สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2550). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น. สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Baumgartner, P. (2013). Educational dimentions of microlearning: towards a taxonomy for microlearning. in Lindner, P.B. & Lindner, P.A. (Eds). Designing microlearning experiences: building up knowledge in organizations and companies. Innsbruck University Press.
Caner, M. (2021). The definition of blended learning in higher education. IGI Global.
Carman, J. (2005). Blended learning design: five keys ingredients. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238687086_Blended_learning_design_Five_key_ingredients
Coakley, D.G. (2017). Micro-learning—adopting digital pedagogies to facilitate technology-enhanced teaching and learning for CPD. In Choy, G.T. (Ed). Empowering 21st century learners through holistic and enterprising learning. Springer.
Corbeil, D.G. (2021). Microlearning in the digital age. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821623
Dick, W. (2018). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300425
Fang, Q. (2018). A study of college english teaching mode in the context of Micro-learning. Proceedings of the 2018 international conference on management and education, Humanities and Social Sciences (MEHSS 2018) (235-239). Atlantis press. https://doi.org/10.2991/mehss-18.2018.50
Graham, C.R. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environment. in khosrowpour, M. (Ed). Encyclopedia of information science and technology. (253-259). PA, USA: Idea
Group.Graham, C.R., (2006). Blended learning system: definition, current trends and future direction. in Bonk, C.A. (Ed). The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs.
Wiley.Javorcik, T., Kostolanyova, K., & Havlaskova, T. (2023). Microlearning in the education of future teachers: monitoring and evaluating students’ activity in microlearning course. The Electronics journal of e-Learning, 21(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623
Kohnke, L. (2023). Using technology to design ESL/EFL microlearning activities. Springer Nature.
Kolinski, H. (2022, 12 March). Understanding microlearning: definition, benefits, and examples. https://www.ispringsolutions.com/blog/what-is-microlearning
Mo, A. & Lee, S. (2017). A study on the experience of college students using smartphones during class: focused on students of child care departments in colleges. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 18(2), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2017.18.2.303
Nantha, C., Siripongdee, K., Siripongdee, S., Pimdee, P.
Kantathanawat, T. & Boonsomchuae, K. (2024). Enhancing ICT literacy and achievement: A TPACK based blended learning model for Thai business administration students. Education Sciences, 14(5), 455-460. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050455
Norberg, A. (2017). From blended learning to learning onlife - ICTs, time and access to higher education. Umeå, Sweden: department of applied educational science, print and media.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2013). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press.
Pimdee, P., Sukkamart, A. Nantha, C., Kantathanawat, T., & Leekitchwatana, P. (2024). Enhancing Thai student-teacher problem-solving skills and academic achievement through a blended problem-based learning approach in online flipped classrooms. Heliyon, 10(7), e29172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29172
Shannon, T. (2020). What is microlearning? https://www.ispringsolutions.com/blog/what-is-micro-learning
Siripongdee, K., Pimdee, P. & Tuntiwonwanich, S. (2020). A blended learning model with IoT-based technology: effectively used when the covid-19 pandemic? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.698869
Thompson, B.M., Mazer, J. P. & Grady, E. F. (2015). The changing nature of parent-teacher communication: mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64(2), 187-207. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014382
Varouchas, E., Sicilia, M. & Sanchex-Alonso, S. (2018). Academics’ perceptions on quality in higher education shaping key performance indicators. Sustainability, 10(12), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124752
