Ethics of Transparency and Deception in AI-Generated Advertising Images
Keywords:
Advertising Ethics, Transparency, Advertising Imagery, Artificial Intelligence, DeceptionAbstract
In the digital era, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal tool in the creation of advertising imagery. Its capacity to generate hyper-realistic visuals and synthetic truth has raised significant ethical challenges, particularly regarding the blurred boundaries between creativity and deception, which directly affect consumer trust. This academic article aims to analyze the ethical dimensions of AI-generated advertising images and propose guidelines for responsible governance. The study employs qualitative research through documentary analysis, utilizing critical content synthesis based on three major ethical frameworks: 1) fundamental ethical theories and the concept of hyperreality, 2) communication ethics and discourse ethics, and 3) professional advertising ethics in Thailand.
The findings reveal that while traditional ethical frameworks remain valuable, they are insufficient to address emerging contexts in which the distinction between reality and artificial creation has become increasingly ambiguous. The author synthesizes these insights to propose the “TRUTH Model” (Transparency, Representation, User Impact, Threshold, and Honesty) as a conceptual guideline for ethical practice and decision-making. Furthermore, the study recommends governance mechanisms that emphasize concrete transparency, including standardized labeling and clear disclosure when AI-generated or AI-manipulated content is used. These measures aim to balance technological innovation with social responsibility and to promote media literacy in the digital age.
References
ธรรมนิติ. (2567, 27 ธันวาคม). รายงานความโปร่งใส (Transparency report) หัวใจสำคัญของการทำธุรกิจ. https://www.dharmniti.co.th/transparency-report/
สมาคมโฆษณาแห่งประเทศไทย. (2559). Ethics จรรยาบรรณแห่งวิชาชีพโฆษณา. https://www.adassothai.com/index.php/main/about/ethic
สมาคมโฆษณาแห่งประเทศไทย. (2565). AAT code of ethics: แนวปฏิบัติในการโฆษณาและสื่อสารการตลาด. สมาคมโฆษณาแห่งประเทศไทย. https://www.adassothai.com/include/upload/images/th_con_upload/2022062808342339124.pdf
Aimarketingethics. (2024, Nov 27). Unmasking AI in advertising: Why transparency is key. https://aimarketingethics.substack.com/p/unmasking-ai-in-advertising
Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
Chen, J. (2024). Exploring the effect of deepfake-based advertising on consumer perception. Texas A&M International University Working Paper
Clark, E. (2024, Mar 24). The ethical dilemma of AI in marketing: A slippery slope. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/elijahclark/2024/03/14/the-ethical-dilemma-of-ai-in-marketing-a-slippery-slope/
Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2009). The current state of advertising ethics: Industry and academic perspectives. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 83–107.
ETDA. (2025). Thailand resumes development of AI regulatory framework. Electronic Transactions Development Agency. https://www.etda.or.th/en
FTC. (2024, Sep 25). FTC announces crackdown on deceptive AI claims and schemes. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/09/ftc-announces-crackdown-deceptive-ai-claims-schemes
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.
Hanna, K. T., & Wigmore, I. (2022, Nov 23). What is transparency. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/transparency
Hogan Lovells. (2024, Feb 17). AI ads & deepfake celebs & misleading claims, oh my!. https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/ai-ads-deepfake-celebs-misleading-claims-oh-my-united-states
Kant, I. (1993/1785). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (3rd ed.). Hackett Publishing.
Knott, A., Pedreschi, D., Jitsuzumi, T. Leavy, S., Eyers, D., Chakraborti, T., Trotman, A., Sundareswaran, S., Baeza-Yates, Ri., Biecek, P., Weller, A.,. Teal, P. D., Basu, S., Haklidir, M., Morini, V., Russell, S. & Bengio, Y. (2024). AI content detection in the emerging information ecosystem: new obligations for media and tech companies. Ethics and Information Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09795-1
Loeb, M. (2024). Defining 'ethical' and 'responsible' use of AI in advertising. https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2024/10/defining-ethical-and-responsible-use-of-ai-in-advertising
Mill, J. S. (1998/1863). Utilitarianism (R. Crisp, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Mills & Reeve. (2025, Jun 15). Disclosure of AI in advertising. https://www.mills-reeve.com/publications/disclosure-of-ai-in-advertising/
NIM. (2025). Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated marketing content. https://www.nim.org/en/publications/detail/transparency-without-trust
Park, P. S., Goldstein, S., O’Gara, A., Chen, M., & Hendrycks, D. (2024). AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions. Patterns, 5(5), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.14752
Sharma, A., & Sharma, R. (2021). Transparency and trust in advertising: The role of honest communication. Journal of Marketing Ethics, 12(3), 45–59.
Sharma, N., & Sharma, V. (2021). Misleading advertisements and their impact on consumers. JournalNX- A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(4), 109–113.
Snyder, J. A. (2025, Jan 19). Beyond the illusion-The real threat of AI: WEF Global Risks Report 2025. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonsnyder/2025/01/19/beyond-the-illusionthe-real-threat-of-ai-wef-global-risks-report-2025/
The MATTER. (2023, Aug 18). ทำไมไม่สนับสนุนให้ใช้ภาพที่ AI สร้าง? เมื่อ AI อาจก็อปปี้ภาพของศิลปินโดยไม่ได้รับความยินยอม. https://thematter.co/brief/210965/210965
Vats, A., & Sati, K. (2025). Advertising And Marketing Ethics (1st ed., pp. 142-163). Noble Science Press. https://doi.org/10.52458/9789349381636.nsp.2025.eb.ch-09
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pitchayatat Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Every article is peer-reviewed for academic correctness by at least three external qualified experts. The opinions in the Pitchayatat Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences) belong to the authors; not belong to the Publisher. Thus, Pitchayatat Journal cannot to be held responsible for them. The articles in this journal are protected by the copyright of Thailand. No part of each issue may be reproduced for dissemination without written permission from the publisher.