The Factors and the Indicators of Growth Mindset for Undergraduate Teacher Professional Students
Keywords:
Growth mindset, Factors analysis, Undergraduate teacher professional studentsAbstract
This research aimed to study and examine indicators components of growth mindset for undergraduate teacher professional students and assessed their construct validity. The samples were 11 experts, 700 students from faculty of education for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 1,017 students from faculty of education for the confirmation factor analysis (CFA). All samples were obtained by multi-stage random sampling technique. Research instruments were the growth mindset measurement form for student with rating scale 6 levels 92 questions. Data was analyzed by correlation coefficient with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The research findings were as follows: 1. There were 6 factors and 20 indicators of growth mindset including 1) the belief that intellectual ability can be improved had 3 indicators, 2) the welcoming of challenges had 4 indicators, 3) the insistent when failure had 3 indicators, 4) the belief that effort makes learning had 3 indicators, 5) the learning from criticism had 3 indicators and, 6) the seeking of lessons and inspirations from successors had 4 indicators. 2. The structure equation model of component and indicator of growth mindset for undergraduate teacher professional students was correlated with empirical data. The statistics showed that goodness-of-fit between model and empirical data had Chi-square equal to 170.42 (P = 0.07324) at the degree of freedom 145, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) equal 0.99, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) equal to 0.98, root mean square residual (RMR) equal to 0.02 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) equal to 0.01. The result shown that the model had the construct validity with could be descending ordered by weighted as follows; the belief that effort makes learning, the learning from criticism, the insistent when failure, the seeking of lessons and inspirations from successors, the welcoming of challenges and the belief that intellectual ability can be improved. The weighted score of each component was 0.93, 0.84, 0.86, 0.85, 0.77 and 0.76 respectively.
References
วันวิสาข์ เคน. การเรียนรู้แห่งศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพฯ: openworlds, 2556.
สารสนเทศอุดมศึกษา .นักศึกษารวม 2558 ภาคเรียนที่ 1ในสถานบันอุดมศึกษาทั้งหมด จำแนกตามสถานบัน กลุ่มสถาบัน เพศ ระดับการศึกษา คณะ ชื่อสาขาวิชา (จำแนกตามชั้นปี). (ออนไลน์) 2558 (อ้างเมื่อ 15 กันยายน 2558). จาก http://www.info.mua.go.th/information/index.php
Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (2002): 113-125.
Boaler, J. Ability and mathematics. The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. In Forum 55 (2013): 143-152.
Dweck, C. S. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY, US : Psychology Press, 2000.
............. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House, 2006.
............. The secret to raising smart kids. Scientific American Mind, 18, 6 (2007c): 36-43.
............. Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership 68, 1 (2010a): 16-20.
............ Mind-sets. Principal Leadership 10,5 (2010b): 26-29.
............ Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. Robinson: Hachette UK, 2012.
Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate data analysis (6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
Mangels, Jennifer A., et al. "Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 1, 2 (2006): 75-86.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Every article is peer-reviewed for academic correctness by at least two external qualified experts. The opinions in the Journal of Graduate School, Pitchayatat, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University (Humanities and Social Sciences) belong to the authors; not belong to the Publisher. Thus, Graduate School of Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University cannot to be held responsible for them. The articles in this journal are protected by the copyright of Thailand. No part of each issue may be reproduced for dissemination without written permission from the publisher.