บททบทวนความรู้ว่าด้วยกรอบกระบวนทัศน์การจัดการขยะของสังคมโลก A Review of Solid Waste Management Paradigm Shift in the Global Society
Keywords:
waste management paradigm, waste management etymologica, waste management evolutionAbstract
This article aims to review the shifting paradigm of solid waste management in the changing global society. The hypothesis is that the global paradigm of solid waste management has changed in many ways. Nevertheless, nowadays, solid waste management using government dominant is still the mainstream of management trend. This study focuses on literature reviewing.
Over past eight decades, the global society has continuously developed and debated concerning to solid waste management paradigm and conception. The original idea of solid waste management started from the paradigm of waste elimination during the post period of after the second World War to 1970’s following by the idea of Waste-To-Energy development (WtE) during the year of 1970-1985, the waste re-use and waste recycling development during 1985-1995, the integrated solid waste management development (ISWM) during 1995-2005, the zero waste management development (ZWM) during 2005-2020, and the circular economy development.The conception of circular economy development was proposed since 1970’s and the concept has been utterly developed the implementation since 2010 until present. On the other hand, there is another proposed paradigm, which is the paradigm of solid waste management. The four proposed models include the Dominant Paradigm Model, the Discard Separation Paradigm Model, the Value in Use Paradigm Model, and the Material Flows Paradigm Model. The conclusion of the review is based on the hypothesis as stated.
References
DEFRA. (2011). The Economic of Waste and Waste Policy. Waste Economics Team, Environment and Growth Economics, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London, UK.
Deumling, R. (2001). The Future of “Waste”: etymological and conceptual foundations of solid waste management. Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley.California. USA
Dijkema, G.P.J., Reuter, M.A., & Verhoef, E.V. (2000). New paradigm for waste management.Waste Management, 20(8), 633-638.
Forsyth, T. (2005). Building deliberative public–private partnerships for waste management in Asia.Geoforum, 36, 429–439.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink,.E.J. (2017). The circular economy - A newsustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143(1), 757-768.
Hallowes, D. & Munnik, V. (2008). Wasting the nation making trash of people and places. TheGroundwork Report. Groundwork: Pietermaritzburg.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resource, Conservation and Recycling. 127, 221-232.
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., and Seppala, J. (2018). Circular economy the concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46.
Korse, M. (n.d.). Resource Hierarchy Explained. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from https://blog.mauritskorse.nl/en/2016/01/waste-hierarchy-explained/
Lansink, A. (2015, June 18-19). From waste - to resource-management, The Ladder of Lansink:Instrument for the (third) transition to circular economy. Third International Conference onWaste Management (ICWM), Pisa, Italy.
Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand. (2002). The New Zealand Waste Strategy: Towards Zero Waste and a sustainable New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand.
Nordman, B. (1995a). Celebrating consumption. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. CA.
Nordman, B. (1995b). What is waste. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. CA.
OECD. (2004). Addressing the Economic of Waste. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, France.
Oral, M. (2009). Green supply chain management research: ontological and epistemological issues.Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Network, Logistics and Transportation(CIRRELT).
Pongracz, E. (2002). Re-defining the concepts of waste and waste management: evolving the theory of waste management. Department of Process and Environmental Engineering,University of Oulu, Finland.
Pongracz, E., Phillips, PS., & Keiski, RL. (2004, September 28 – October 1). Evolving the theoryof waste management-implications to waste minimization. Accepted to the Waste Management 2004 Conference, To be presented Rhodes, Greece
Rossem, CV., Tojo, N., & Lindhqvist, T. (2006). Extended producer responsibility: An examination of its impact on innovation and greening products. The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund University, Sweden.
Satterthwaite D., Mitlin, D., & Patel, S. (2011). Engaging with the urban poor and their Organisation for poverty reduction and urban governance, issues paper for United Nation Development Programme. New York, USA.
Seldman, N. (2005). Zero waste as the last solid waste management paradigms, in GRC International Dialog White Paper: Proper Discard Management in the New Millennium, San Francisco,CA, August 26 & 27, 2004. Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Washington, DC, USA.
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu. X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: movingfrom rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215-227.
United Nation. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: OurCommon Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nation.
UNEP & ISWA. (2015). Global Waste Management Outlook. International Environmental TechnologyCentre (IETC), Division of Industry, Technology and Economic, UNEP.
Vergara, S. E. & Tchobanoglous, G. (2012). Municipal solid waste and the environment: A globalperspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2012(37), 277-309.
World Bank. (2012). What is waste: A global review of solid waste management. Urban Development & Local Government Unit, The World Bank, Washington DC.
Zhijun, F. & Nailing, Y. (2007). Pitting a circular economy into practices in China. Sustainable Science, 2007(2), 95–101.
