The Communication Elements and Language Strategies in Responding to Dhamma-Related Questions in “Miss Parian 9” Program
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to examine the communication elements present in Miss Parian (Pariyat) 9 Program and to analyze the language strategies used in responding to Dhamma-related questions. Data were collected from six episodes published on the YouTube channel-Prairie Phaiwan. The findings reveal that all eight elements of communication are evident in the program and contribute to understanding the communication context, playing a role in shaping the language used. Two primary language strategies were identified in responding to Dhamma-related questions: the direct-response strategy and the evasive-response strategy. Both strategies primarily serve to convey information related to Dhamma and also contribute to making the responses in Miss Parian 9 more engaging and accessible to the audience.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5(8), 1–20. http://www. languageatinternet.de/articles/2008
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum International.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Chaithaworn, S. (2014). Linguistic strategies adopted by Thai actors and actresses in answering press questions: A case study of T.V. Pool Live [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversations. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1–30.
Hymes, D. (1974). The foundations of sociolinguistics: Sociolinguistic ethnography. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kuprasert, P. (2023). The strategies of doctors in answering health-related questions through the internet. In A. Paksasuk & A. Toomaneejinda (Eds.), Language, society, Somchai (pp. 155–176). Thammasat University Press. (in Thai)
Longacre, R. E. (1983). The grammar of discourse. Plenum Press.
Makthavornvattana, T. (2009). The study of the ex-prime minister Samak Sundaravej’s answering strategies of interviews. Journal of Studies in the Field of Humanities, 16(2), 72–85. (in Thai)
Ongwuttiwat, S. (2010). Linguistic strategies of Thai celebrities when answering questions posed by the media in interview situations. Wannawithat, 10, 54–93. (in Thai)
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. The University of Chicago Press.
Theamsomboon, S. (1998). Linguistic devices in politicians’ response in journalistic interviews [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
Thurlow, C. & Mroczek, K. (Eds.). (2011). Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press.
Vongvipanond, P. (1987). Discourse: A new approach to studying Thai syntax. Thai Language and Literature, 4(2), 29–43. (in Thai)
Wongthai, T. (2019). Language and meaning (2nd ed.). Work All Print Company Limited. (in Thai)
