Conflict in Water Resources Management: A Case Study of the Ban Muang Takua Dam Project in Phatthalung Province

Abstract

This research investigates the causes of conflict over the water resources management, its movement and tactics, and the criteria influencing the success of social movements of the Ban Muang Takua dam project, Phatthalung Province. A qualitative research approach was employed with data gathered from primary and secondary sources as well as non-participant observation and in-depth interviews with stakeholders involved in the conflict, government officials, and local community members.

            Results indicated: 1) five main causes of conflict, including structure, misinformation, relationship, benefit and different values, leading to erosion of stakeholder trust and conflict escalation among opponents engaged in substantive, procedural, and relational dimensions of conflict; 2) effectiveness of diverse tactics in name of “Rak Ton Sator” group movement through mainstream tactics such as lobbying and nonviolent mobilization tactics, including rallies, sit ins and civil disobedience. The Rak Ton Sator group aimed to mobilize resources, garner support, attract media attention, forge alliances with those in power, and refine organizational structure. Criteria determining the efficacy of organizational strength, insurgent consciousness and political opportunity structure in influencing success of social movements like the Rak Ton Sator group included grievances and few internal resources appearing in the movement. These findings underscore the importance of implementing participatory decision-making processes involving local communities and utilizing reliable data for resolving public project conflicts. When conflicts arise, collaboration between public and private sectors, as well as local communities, is essential for effective water resources management. Crucially, all sectors must engage in dialogue and provide platforms for strategic planning based on factual information.